Students’ Perceived Benefits and Challenges on the Integration of Digital Tools into Undergraduate Thesis Writing in Islamic Higher Education

Pryla Rochmahwati, Entika Fani Prastikawati, Nadiah Ma'mun

Abstract


This study examines the role of digital tools in fostering undergraduate students' thesis writing process. While digital tools are now widely applied in academia, limited studies have focused on how these tools impact the quality of students' theses and the challenges they encounter. The qualitative case study design involving 7th-semester students from the English Education Department at an Islamic higher education institution in Ponorogo was employed to explore their perceptions of digital tools through questionnaires, observations, and in-depth interviews. The findings indicated that students use various digital tools, including word processors, reference management software, and data analysis programs. The result of thematic analysis revealed that students perceived digital tools to facilitate the quality, effectiveness, organization of thesis work, and motivation. Although some students faced technical difficulties, unfamiliarity with advanced software features, and resource constraints, they believed learning with digital tools positively influenced their academic performance. The study contributes valuable insights for educators and institutions, informing strategies to optimize the use of digital tools in thesis writing.

Keywords


Benefits; Challenges; Digital tools; Thesis writing; Undergraduates

Full Text:

PDF

References


Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/thematic-analysis/book248481

Calma, A., Cotronei-Baird, V., & Chia, A. (2022). Grammarly: An instructional intervention for writing enhancement in management education. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(3), 100704. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100704

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Sixth edition). SAGE. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3784840

Curry, N. (2023). How should digital tools for writing be evaluated? Reflections from digital pedagogies and applied linguistics. Journal of Academic Writing, 13(1), 53–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v13i1.970

Frolova, E., Rogach, O., & Ryabova, T. (2020). Digitalization of education in modern scientific discourse: New trends and risks analysis. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 9(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2020.2.313

Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102(101586). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586

Hojeij, Z., & Ayber, P. O. (2022). Effectiveness of using digital feedback on EFL student writing skills. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.291111

Ivanova, M., Arupova, N., & Mekeko, N. (2022). Digital support for teaching punctuation in academic writing in English. Journal of Language and Education, 8(3), 81–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.13608

Jarrah, A. M., Wardat, Y., & Fidalgo, P. (2023). Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism: What does the literature say? Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(4), e202346. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13572

Johnson, C. W., & Paulus, T. M. (2024). Generating a reflexive AI-assisted workflow for academic writing. The Qualitative Report, 29(10). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.7634

Krajka, J., & Olszak, I. (2024). “AI, will you help?” How learners use artificial intelligence when writing. XLinguae, 17(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2024.17.01.03

Mahyoob, M., Algaraady, J., & Alblwi, A. (2023). Proposed framework for human-like language processing of ChatGPT in academic writing. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 18(14), 282–293. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i14.41725

Memon, M. Q., Lu, Y., Memon, A. R., Memon, A., Munshi, P., & Shah, S. F. A. (2022). Does the impact of technology sustain students’ satisfaction, academic and functional performance: An analysis via interactive and self-regulated learning? Sustainability, 14(12), 7226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127226

Pitukwong, K., & Saraiwang, S. (2024). Exploring the effectiveness of digital writing tools on Thai EFL students’ writing. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(3), ep519. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14808

Pravita, A. R., & Kuswandono, P. (2022). Writing anxiety and academic procrastination on undergraduate thesis writing: The role of self-regulation. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 9(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v9i1.4010

Ramamuthie, V., & Abdul Aziz, A. (2022). Systematic review: The effectiveness of digital tools to improve writing skill of ESL students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(3), 408–427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i3/12897

Royani, Ida, & Sihombing, M. R. (2024). ChatGPT in the academic writing classroom. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 7(2), 630–638. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v7i2.15615

Sairo, M. I., Ratminingsih, N. M., & Sudira, I. G. A. (2021). Using digital mind mapping to improve writing skills. Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review, 4(2), 271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v4i2.39933

Sharma, U. N. (2025). Systematizing source management and citation in academic writing using EndNote: My lived experience. Studies in ELT and Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 86–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3126/seltal.v2i2.74082

Susanti, M., Kusmiarti, R., Mamnun, H., AR, R., & Natalia, N. (2024). Training on reference manager tool (Mendeley) for students of faculty of Islamic studies, universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu. Aktual: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.58723/aktual.v2i2.185

Tanrıkulu, F. (2022). Students’ perceptions about the effects of collaborative digital storytelling on writing skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(5–6), 1090–1105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1774611

Vijai, D. C., Natarajan, D. K., & Elayaraja, M. M. (2019). Citation tools and reference management software for academic writing. GIS Business, 14(6), 586–596. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26643/gis.v14i6.14788

Xue, H. (2024). Impact of the digital education environment on student academic performance in higher education institutions. Region - Educational Research and Reviews, 6(3), 29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32629/rerr.v6i3.1760

Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2022). Types, purposes, and effectiveness of state-of-the-art technologies for second and foreign language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 696–742. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1744666

Zinkevich, N. A., & Ledeneva, T. V. (2021). Using Grammarly to enhance students’ academic writing skills. Professional Discourse & Communication, 3(4), 51–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2021-3-4-51-63




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/jetli.v8i1.31785

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of English Teaching and Learning Issues

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License