Four-Tier Multiple Choice Test Characterized by Local Wisdom Values for Analyzing Critical Thinking Skills
Abstract
This study aims to develop a four-tier multiple choice test instrument characterized by the values of local wisdom to describe the characteristics of the instrument, determine the validity and reliability of the instrument, determine the characteristics of items, and analyze the critical thinking skills of class X students on Momentum and Impulse material. This research is Research and Development (R&D) and uses the Borg and Gall development model. The research methods used included interviews, tests, questionnaires, and documentation. The four levels of the four-tier multiple choice test instrument consist of: multiple choice questions, answer confidence level, reason choice, and reason confidence level. Validity testing by the three validators obtained the result that the instrument developed was valid. Reliability testing shows that the developed question instrument is reliable with the acquisition of a value of 0.946. The test questions consist of 14 questions in the medium category and 7 questions in the difficult category. The difference in power index is 0.22 to 0.53 which consists of 11 good enough questions, 6 good questions, and 4 very good questions. Overall results of critical thinking skills of students 11.93% in the very critical category, 5.93% in the critical category, 12.2% in the less critical category type 1A (LC1A), 10.87% in the less critical category type 1B ( LC1B), 8.56% in the less critical category type 2A (LC2A), 9% in the less critical category type 2B (LC2B), and 41.36% in the non-critical category.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agustin, D. K., Yuliati, L., & Zulaikah, S. (2016). Kesalahan Siswa SMA dalam Memecahkan Masalah Momentum-Impuls. Pros. Semnas Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM, 174–183. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Arifin, Z. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Analisis Kesalahan untuk Mengukur Critical Thinking Skill Berdasarkan Kompetensi Inti Kurikulum. EduMa, 7(1).
Arikunto, S. (2007). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Revisi). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.
Ennis, R. H. (1986). A Logical Basis for Measuring Critical Thinking Skills. Educational Leadership, 43(2), 44–48.
Fariyani, Q., Rusilowati, A., & Sugianto. (2015). Pengembangan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test untuk Mengungkap Miskonsepsi Fisika Siswa SMA Kelas X. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 4(2), 41–49.
Hadi, S., & Novaliyosi. (2019). TIMSS Indonesia ( Trends In International Mathematics And Science Study ). Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call For Papers, 562–569.
Harususilo, Y. E. (2019, December 4). Skor PISA Terbaru Indonesia. Kompas.Com.
Mubarak, S., Susilaningsih, E., & Cahyono, E. (2016). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Three Tier Multiple Choice. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 5(2), 101–110.
Mukti, T. S., & Istiyono, E. D. I. (2018). Instrumen Penilaian Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik SMA Negeri Mata Pelajaran Biologi Kelas X Instrument for Assessing the Critical Thinking Ability of High School Students on Biology Subject X Grade. Jurnal Pendidikan Biolog, 11(2), 105–110.
Nurazizah, S., Sinaga, P., & Jauhari, A. (2017). Profil Kemampuan Kognitif dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA pada Materi Usaha dan Energi. 3, 197–202.
Nurhayati, H. M., Rahayu, S., & Yahmin. (2016). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Kimia Kelarutan dengan LC-5E Berkonteks SSI terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA. 4(4), 137–143.
Oktaviani, W., Gunawan, & Sutrio. (2017). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Fisika Kontekstual untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, III(1), 1–7.
Pradana, S. D. S., Parno, & Handayanto, S. K. (2017). Pengembangan Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Pada Materi Optik Geometri Untuk Mahasiswa Fisika. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 21(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pep.v21i1.13139
Pratiwi, I. (2019). Efek Program Pisa Terhadap Kurikulum di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 4, 51–71.
Putri, O. D., Nevrita, & Hindrasti, N. E. K. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA pada Materi Sistem Pencernaan. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 14–27.
Rahmawati, I., Hidayat, A., & Rahayu, S. (2016). Analisis Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP Pada Materi Gaya dan Penerapannya. Pros. Seminar Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM, 1, 1112–1119.
Satriawan, M., Subhan, M., & Fatimah. (2017). Pembelajaran Fisika Berbantuan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Kontekstual dengan Mengintegrasi Kearifan Lokal untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Fisika. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 8(2), 115–120.
Sukardi. (2011). Evaluasi Pendidikan (Prinsip & Operasionalnya) (1st ed.; F. Yustianti, ed.). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Suparno. (2013). Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep dalam Pendidikan Fisika. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.
Syahrul, D. A., & Setyarsih, W. (2015). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Penyebab Miskonsepsi Siswa dengan Three-tier Diagnostic Test pada Materi Dinamika Rotasi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika (JIPF), 04(03), 67–70.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v4i1.8062
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.