Development and validation of a supplementary e-learning module in biomolecule

Annabeth Mamacang Aque

Abstract


The “new normal”, characterized by the exigencies of asynchronous learning, presents significant pedagogical challenges, particularly concerning student comprehension, sustained engagement, and academic achievement in environments with constrained direct instructional guidance. This context necessitates the development of robust self-directed learning resources. This mixed-methods study investigated the systematic development and pedagogical efficacy of a supplementary e-learning module focused on biomolecules. Employing the ADDIE Model as a foundational framework and meticulously aligned with K-12 curriculum standards, the learner-centered module garnered exemplary evaluations from a distinguished panel of subject matter experts. Quantitative analysis of post-intervention assessments revealed a profound enhancement in student performance: pre-intervention scores predominantly clustered within the Developing or Approaching Proficiency strata, whereas subsequent to module engagement, 69.5% of students attained an Advanced classification and 30.5% achieved Proficient status, signifying a demonstrable shift towards conceptual mastery. Statistical analysis confirmed a significant improvement in academic outcomes. Complementary qualitative data, derived from structured interviews, provided robust evidence of the module's instrumental role in fostering learner autonomy and cultivating profound conceptual understanding. The absence of reported negative feedback, while potentially influenced by contextual factors, suggests a generally favorable reception. These findings underscore the module's efficacy in addressing the complexities of asynchronous learning environments, positioning it as a valuable pedagogical tool for educators and a substantive contribution to the ongoing advancement of science education within flexible learning paradigms.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Atkinson, J.W., & Birch, D. (1978). An Introduction to Motivation (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand.

Bandura, A. (1981). Self-referent thought: A developmental analysis of self-efficacy. In J.H. Flavell and L. Ross (Eds) Social Cognitive Development: Frontiers and Possible Futures. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122– 147.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.

Barlia, L., & Beeth, M.E. (1999). High school students’ motivation to engage in conceptual change learning in science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA, March.

Brophy, J. (1998). Motivating students to learn. Madison, WI: McGraw Hill.

Brophy, Jere E. (2010). Motivating students to learn. New York, NY: Routledge.

Choe, R. C., Scuric, Z., Eshkol, E., Cruser, S., Arndt, A., Cox, R., … Crosbie, R. H. (2019). Student Satisfaction and Learning Outcomes in Asynchronous Online Lecture Videos. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(4), ar55. doi:10.1187/cbe.18-08-0171

Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R.

Duffy, T. M. & Kirkley, J. R. (2004). Learning theory and pedagogy applied in distance learning: The case of Cardean University. In T. M.

Duffy, & J. R. Kirkley, (Eds), Learner-Centered Theory and Practice in Distance Education (pp. 107 – 141). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Erb, M. (1996). Increasing students’ responsibility for their learning through multiple intelligence activities and cooperative learning. Unpublished master’s thesis, Saint Xavier University, IL.

Fırat M, Kılınç H, Yüzer TV. Level of intrinsic motivation of distance education students in e‐learning environments. J Comput Assist Learn. 2018;34:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12214

Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: The role of selfschemas and self-regulatory strategies. Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications, 127–153.

Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P.R. (1992). Critical thinking and its relationship to motivation, learning strategies, and classroom experience. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, August.

Huang, S.Y., & Waxman, H.C. (1995). Motivation and learning environment differences between Asian-American and white middle school students in mathematics. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 28(4), 208–219.

Kuyper, H., van der Werf, M.P.C., & Lubbers, M.J. (2000). Motivation, meta-cognition and self-regulation as predictors of long term educational attainment. Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(3), 181–201.

Lee, O. (1989). Motivation to learning science in middle school classrooms. University Microfilms International. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

Lee, O., & Brophy, J. (1996). Motivational patterns observed in sixth-grade science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 585–610.

Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. (2011). Investigating students’ perceptions of various instructional strategies to establish social presence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

McCombs, B. L. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A phenomenological view. In B. J.

Mulig-Cruz, Charity I. and Barquilla, Manuel B. and Tabudlong, Josefina R. and Magallanes, Jingle B., Development of Progressive Learning Theory – Based Physics Enhancement Course (May 25, 2015). Proceedings Journal of Education, Psychology and Social Science Research, 2015 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3100196

National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom. School Field, 7(2), 133–144. doi:10.1177/1477878509104318

Nolen, S.B., & Haladyna, T.M. (1989). Psyching out the science teacher: Students’ motivation, perceived teacher goals and study strategies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, March.

Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544–555.

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 33–40.

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor. Michigan. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Pintrich, P.R., Marx, R.W., & Boyle, R.A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199.

Stein, D. S., Wanstreet, C. E., Calvin, J., Overtoom, C., & Wheaton, J. E. (2005). Bridging the transactional distance gap in online learning environments. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 105–118. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1902_4

Strike, K.A., & Posner, P.J. (1983). On rationality and learning: A reply to West and Pines. Science Education, 67, 41–43.

Strike, K.A., & Posner, P.J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R.A. Duschl and R.J. Hamilton (Eds) Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practise (pp. 147–176). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Taylor, A. (2007). Programming for the internet and experiential learning: A new approach incorporating a constructed world. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 17(2), 217-229.

Tuan, H.L, Chin. C.C, and Shieh, S.H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639-654.

Tuan, H.L., & Chin, C.C. (2000). Promoting junior high school students’ motivation toward physical science learning (III). Report for Taiwan National Research Council (NSC 89-2511- S018-030).

Uguroglu, M.E., Schiller, D.P., & Walberg, H.J. (1981). A multidimensional motivational instrument. Psychology in the Schools, 18, 279–285.

Urdan, T.C., & Maehr, M.L. (1995). Beyond a two-goal theory of motivation and achievement: A case for social goals. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 213–243.

Von Glasersfeld, E. (1998). Cognition, construction of knowledge and teaching. In M.R. Matthews (Ed.) Constructivism in Science Education (11–30). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

West, L.H.T., & Pines, A.L. (1983). How ‘rational’ is rationality? Science Education, 67, 37–39.

Wu, S.J., & Tuan, H.L. (2000). A case study of students’ motivation in a ninth grader physical science class. In D. Fisher and J.H. Yang (Eds) Proceedings of the Second Conference on Science, Mathematics and Technology Education (341–350). Perth: Curtin University of Technology.

Yong, B. C. S.,“Form 5 science students‟ attitudes and achievement in biology: gender differences. In H.S. Dhindsa, S.B. Lim, P. Achleitner& M.A. (Ken) Clements (Eds.),”Studies in Science, Mathematics and Technical Education, University Brunei Darussalam, 45-51 (2003)

Ayub, N.,“Effect of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on academic performance,”Pakistan Business Review, 363-372 (2010, July)

Tella, A.,“The impact of motivation on student‟s academic achievement and learning outcomes in mathematics among secondary school students in Nigeria,”Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(2): 149-156(2007)

Elliot, A.J. &Dweck, C.S. (Eds.),Handbook of competence and motivation. New York: Guilford Press(2005)

Matuga, J.M.,“Self-regulation, goal orientation and academic achievement of secondary students in online university courses,”Educational Technology & Society, 12(3): 4-11(2009)

Ominowa OT, Bamidele EF. Effectiveness of video-mediated instruction on teaching secondary school practical chemistry in Akure South Local Government Area of Ondo State, Nigeria. European Journal of Education Studies. 2016;2(5).

Patric, A.O., Kpangban, E.&Chibueze, O.O.,“Motivation effects on test scores of senior secondary school science students,”Studies on Home and Community Science, 1(1): 57-64. (2007)

Peipei, L.&Guirong P.,The Relationship between motivation and achievement(2009)

Patrick, H., Mantzicopoulos, P., Samarapungavan, A.& French, B. F.,“Patterns of young children‟s motivation for science and teacher-child relationships,”The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(2): 121-144 (2008)

Spandana B., Neela Rani R. & Suchiritha Devi S., “Students’ Motivation towards Science Learning (SMTSL) - An Intervention with Video and Quizzes” Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 39(4): 85-91 (2020)

Talib, O., Luan, W.S., Azhar, S.C.&Abdullah, N.,“Uncovering Malaysian students‟ motivation to learning science,”European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2): 266-276. (2009)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v8i1.28802

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.