“ChemFUN” Android Application to Explore Students’ Understanding of Chemical Representation on Matter Topic
Abstract
This study aims to develop an android-based application to explore students understanding of chemical representation on matter topics. This study used a DDD-E development model as a research method, consisting of deciding stage, designing stage, developing stage, and evaluating stage. The deciding stage begins with analyzing the content and the software used to develop it. The designing stage consists of drawing a flowchart and the storyboard. Then, in the developing stage, the application was developed based on flowchart and the storyboard. The last is evaluating stage, which involves five expert judges reviewing the application. The result shows that the ChemFUN Android application is compatible only for the Android operating system. However, there are many buttons the user can interact. In guided inquiry, the materials show the chemical multiple representations view and the interconnections between macroscopic, microscopic, and symbolic views. The review result show that the final average score on the content quality is 3.64, followed by a language category with an average score of 3.65 and the design category with an average score of 3.60. Although it still has a low audio, spelling, and grammar score, it has been revised. The average for all categories is 3.63, which is very good, indicating that ChemFUN Android application is ready to be used in the learning activity to explore students understanding of chemical representation on matter topics. Also, this kind of research can be done with different chemistry topics, whether in National Curriculum or Cambridge Curriculum.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anshari, M., Almunawar, M. N., Shahrill, M., Wicaksono, D. K., & Huda, M. (2017). Smartphones usage in the classrooms: Learning aid or interference? Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 3063–3079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9572-7
Astiningsih, A. D., & Partana, C. F. (2020). Using Android Media for Chemistry Learning Construction of Motivation and Metacognition Ability. 13(1), 279–294.
Cahyana, U., Paristiowati, M., Savitri, D. A., & Hasyrin, S. N. (2017). Developing and application of mobile game based learning (M-GBL) for high school students performance in chemistry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(10), 7037–7047. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78728
Cairncross, S., & Mannion, M. (2001). Interactive multimedia and learning: Realizing the benefits. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(2), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290110035428
Davidowitz, B., & Chittleborough, G. (2009). Linking the Macroscopic and Sub-microscopic Levels: Diagrams. 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8_9
Eliyawati, E., Agustin, R. R., Sya’bandari, Y., & Putri, R. A. H. (2020). Smartchem: An Android Application for Learning Multiple Representations of Acid-Base Chemistry. Journal of Science Learning, 3(3), 196–204. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v3i3.23280
Eliyawati, Rohman, I., & Kadarohman, A. (2018). The effect of learning multimedia on students’ understanding of macroscopic, sub-microscopic, and symbolic levels in electrolyte and nonelectrolyte. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012002
Fook, C. Y., Narasuman, S., Aziz, N. A., Mustafa, S. M. S., & Han, C. T. (2021). Smartphone Usage among University Students. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(1), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i1.12622
Gkitzia, V., Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2011). Development and application of suitable criteria for the evaluation of chemical representations in school textbooks. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1rp90003j
Irwansyah, F. S., Yusuf, Y. M., Farida, I., & Ramdhani, M. A. (2018). Augmented Reality (AR) Technology on the Android Operating System in Chemistry Learning. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 288(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/288/1/012068
Ivers, K. S., & Barron, A. E. (2002). Multimedia Projects in Education: Designing, Producing, and Assessing LIBRARIES UNLIMITED TEACHER IDEAS PRESS.
Komalasari, K. (2019). International Journal of Instruction. 12(1), 113–126.
Leacock, T. L., & Nesbit, J. C. (2007). A Framework for Evaluating the Quality of Multimedia Learning Resources- Special Issue on “Quality Research for Learning, Education, and Training.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society-, 10(2), 15.
Ma, L., Gu, L., & Wang, J. (2014). Research and Development of Mobile Application for Android Platform. 9(4), 187–198. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijmue.2014.9.4.20
Markic, S., & Childs, P. E. (2016). Research and Practice Language and the teaching and learning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP90006B
Nordin, N., Embi, M. A., & Yunus, M. M. (2010). Mobile learning framework for lifelong learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(C), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.019
Nugraha, I., Athfyanti, N. N., & Prabawa, H. W. (2020). The development of computer-assisted instruction game on mirror reflection concepts for junior high school students. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v6i1.28927
Ozdamli, F., & Cavus, N. (2011). Basic elements and characteristics of mobile learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 937–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.173
Putra, P. S., Asi, N. B., Anggraeni, M. E., & Karelius. (2020). Development of android-based chemistry learning media for experimenting. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1422(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1422/1/012037
Richey, R.C., Klein, J. D. (2014). Design and Development Research. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition, 1–1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5
Saputra, D., Gürbüz, B., & Haryani, H. (2021). Android-based Animation for Chemical Elements and Experiments as an Interactive Learning Media. Journal of Science Learning, 4(October 2020), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i2.28787
Schuster, K., Groß, K., Vossen, R., Richert, A., & Jeschke, S. (2016). Engineering Education 4.0. Engineering Education 4.0, Icelw 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46916-4
Tan, K. C. D., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S., & Treagust, D. F. (2009). Linking the Macroscopic, Sub-microscopic and Symbolic Levels: The Case of Inorganic Qualitative Analysis. 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8_7
Tsaparlis, G., Kolioulis, D., & Pappa, E. (2010). Lower-secondary introductory chemistry course: A novel approach based on science-education theories, with emphasis on the macroscopic approach, and the delayed meaningful teaching of the concepts of molecule and atom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1039/c005354f
Wan, X., Wang, W., Liu, J., & Tong, T. (2014). Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
Widodo, W., Sudibyo, E., Suryanti, Sari, D. A. P., Inzanah, & Setiawan, B. (2020). The effectiveness of gadget-based interactive multimedia in improving generation z’s scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23208
Wright, T. (2003). Images of atoms. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 49, 18–24.
Yusuf, N. B. (2020). Colleges of Education Students’ Awareness of Use of Multiple Representations in Explaining Chemistry Concepts in Kwara State, Nigeria. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 13(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.13.1.2
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v5i1.12463
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.