Unpacking the Effect of Flipped Learning to Enhance EFL Learners’ Sociopragmatics Knowledge: Speech Acts of Refusals in Focus

Woro Retnaningsih, Yunika Triana, Arif Nugroho

Abstract


Although previous studies have acknowledged the significant effect of flipped classrooms in language learning, few research has concerned about its potential impact on EFL learners’ sociopragmatics knowledge. The present study aims to examine the promising role of flipped learning assisted by WhatsApp applications (i.e., WhatsApp-integrated flipped learning) in enhancing EFL learners’ appropriate use of refusals in English. Another objective is to examine EFL learners’ perception of the WhatsApp-integrated flipped learning activity in facilitating the learning process. This study employed a quasi-experimental with pre-test and post-test design of experimental and control groups. The experimental group (N=36) was taught in a WhatsApp-integrated flipped learning, while the control group (N=36) was enrolled in a similar class but did not experience the use of any digital platform. The intervention was conducted in eight meetings, including the process of data collection using Discourse Completion Tests, semi-structured interviews, and a TAM questionnaire. The results revealed that WhatsApp-integrated flipped learning was proven as an effective strategy to enhance EFL learners’ speech acts of refusals, indicated by a significant difference in the post-test scores of the experimental group compared to the control group. They showed positive acceptance toward the use of the WhatsApp application to facilitate flipped classrooms for teaching sociopragmatics. In addition, the semi-structured interview further disclosed that the learners positively perceived WhatsApp-integrated flipped learning activity. Implications for English language teaching and suggestions for future research are further discussed.

Keywords


Flipped learning; Speech acts of refusals; Communicative competence; EFL learners; Sociopragmatics knowledge.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alibeigloo, H., Ahmadi, H., & Azizmalayeri, F. (2021). On the effectiveness of flipped instruction on Iranian EFL learners’ appropriate use of request and refusal. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 13(2), 147–158. https://ijals.usb.ac.ir/article_6711.html

Alibeigloo, H., Ahmadi, H., & AzizMalayeri, F. (2021). The effect of flipped classroom on Iranian EFL learners’ speech act production: Does flip type make a difference? Iranian Evolutionary and Educational Psychology Journal, 3(2), 118–137. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/ieepj.3.2.118

Andujar, A., & Çakmak, F. (2023). Foreign language learning through instagram: a flipped learning approach. In Research Anthology on Applying Social Networking Strategies to Classrooms and Libraries (pp. 278–299). IGI Global. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/foreign-language-learning-through-instagram/312926

Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Griffin, R. (2005). L2 pragmatic awareness: Evidence from the ESL classroom. System, 33(3), 401–415. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.004

Beebe, L. M., Takahashi, T., & Uliss-Weltz, R. (1990). Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. Developing communicative competence in a second language (R. C. Scarcella, E. S. Anderson, & S. D. Krashen (eds.)). New York: Newbury House. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tomoko-Takahashi-3/publication/309352845_Pragmatic_Transfer_in_ESL_Refusals/links/601376b092851c2d4dfee097/Pragmatic-Transfer-in-ESL-Refusals.pdf

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International society for technology in education. https://www.rcboe.org/cms/lib/ga01903614/centricity/domain/15451/flip_your_classroom.pdf

Bi, J., Bigdeli, H., & Izadpanah, S. (2023). The effect of the flipped classroom on reflective thinking, academic self-efficacy, and achievement motivation in language learners in intermediate level. Education and Information Technologies, 1–25. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11655-2

Chai, A., & Hamid, A. H. A. (2023). The impact of flipped learning on students’ narrative writing. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, 4(4), 159–175. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.55057/ijares.2022.4.4.15

Chen, Y.-S., & Wu, H.-J. (2022). Developing sustainable email pragmatic competence for EFL learners through reformulation. Sustainability, 14(24), 16868. https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16868-d1005016.html

Cohen, A. D. (2005). Strategies for learning and performing L2 speech acts. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2005.2.3.275

Creswel, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles: University of Nebraska–Lincoln. https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/510378/mod_resource/content/1/creswell.pdf

Cunningham, D. J. (2017). Methodological innovation for the study of request production in telecollaboration. Language Learning and Technology, 21(1), 76–99. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316094858_Methodological_innovation_for_the_study_of_request_production_in_telecollaboration

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249008

Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2023). Investigating a failed novel test of socio-pragmatic knowledge. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 100046. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100046

Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2022). Examining the impact of flipped classroom on writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency: a case of EFL students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1668–1706. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1825097

Grundlingh, L. (2018). Memes as speech acts. Social Semiotics, 28(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1303020

Haghighi, H., Jafarigohar, M., Khoshsima, H., & Vahdany, F. (2019). Impact of flipped classroom on EFL learners’ appropriate use of refusal: achievement, participation, perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(3), 261–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1504083

Hazaymeh, W. A., & Altakhaineh, A. R. M. (2019). The effect of flipped classroom instruction on developing emirati EFL learners’ pragmatic competence. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(10), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.10.6

Hudson, T. (2001). Indicators for pragmatic instruction: Some quantitative tools. Pragmatics in Language Teaching, 283–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524797

Hung, H.-T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.967701

Hussein, N., & Albakri, I. (2019). Iraqi learners’ problems in learning speech act of request in EFL classroom. Journal of Education and Practice. ISSN, 2222, 1735. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332383002_Iraqi_Learners’_Problems_in_Learning_Speech_Act_of_Request_in_EFL_Classroom

Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, C.-Y. (2023). Facilitating decision-making performances in nursing treatments: A contextual digital game-based flipped learning approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 156–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1765391

Judy Shih, H., & Huang, S. C. (2022). EFL learners’ metacognitive development in flipped learning: A comparative study. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1448–1460. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1728343

Kentmen, H., Debreli, E., & Yavuz, M. A. (2023). Assessing tertiary Turkish EFL learners’ pragmatic competence regarding speech acts and conversational implicatures. Sustainability, 15(4), 3800. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043800

Kramsch, C. (2014). Language and culture in second language learning. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315793993.ch27

Li, S., He, J., Tao, Y., & Liu, X. (2022). The effects of flipped classroom approach in EFL teaching: Can we strategically use the flipped method to acquire communicative competence? Language Teaching Research, 13621688221081576. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221081575

Li, Z., & Li, J. (2022). Using the flipped classroom to promote learner engagement for the sustainable development of language skills: A mixed-methods study. Sustainability, 14(10), 5983. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105983

Liang, W. (2022). Towards a set of design principles for technology-assisted critical-thinking cultivation: A synthesis of research in English language education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101203

Lo, C. K. (2023). How can flipped learning continue in a fully online environment? Lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic. Primus, 33(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2022.2048929

Lo, C. K. (2024). Strategies for enhancing online flipped learning: a systematic review of empirical studies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(7), 1–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2184392

Nicholas, A. (2015). A concept-based approach to teaching speech acts in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 69(4), 383–394. https://academic.oup.com/eltj/article/69/4/383/630177

Phakiti, A. (2015). Experimental research methods in language learning. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/experimental-research-methods-in-language-learning-9781441122407/

Sadikov, E. T. (2021). Teaching pragmatic speech acts through the receptive and productive skills. Academic Research in Educational Sciences, 2(11), 463–476. https://www.ares.uz/storage/app/media/2021/Vol_2_No_11/463-476.pdf

Shafiee Rad, H., Namaziandost, E., & Razmi, M. H. (2022). Integrating STAD and flipped learning in expository writing skills: Impacts on students’ achievement and perceptions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2030265

Sointu, E., Hyypiä, M., Lambert, M. C., Hirsto, L., Saarelainen, M., & Valtonen, T. (2023). Preliminary evidence of key factors in successful flipping: Predicting positive student experiences in flipped classrooms. Higher Education, 85(3), 503–520. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00848-2

Su, H., & Fu, Y. (2023). Local grammar approaches to speech acts in Chinese: A case study of exemplification. Journal of Pragmatics, 212, 44–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.05.004

Taguchi, N. (2009). Pragmatic competence. Mouton de Gruyter Berlin, Germany. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110218558.1

Webb, C. (2013). Teaching pragmatics to international students in private language schools in the UK. Contemporary English Teaching and Learning in Non-English-Speaking Countries, 2(2), 27–41. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:142861566

Yu, S. Y., & Kaur, J. (2024). Increasing student comprehension in the English-medium instruction (EMI) context: Lecturers’ use of explicitness strategies. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100334

Yuan, W., & Lyu, S. (2022). Speech act matters: Commitment to what’s said or what’s implicated differs in the case of assertion and promise. Journal of Pragmatics, 191, 128–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.012




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/jetli.v7i2.22842

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of English Teaching and Learning Issues

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License