Mengeksplorasi Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Rasa Ingin Tahu Siswa Melalui Kegiatan Laboratorium Inquiry Sederhana
Abstract
Exploring Critical Thinking And Students Curiosity Through Simple Inquiry Laboratory Activity. This study is a preliminary research to explore critical thinking skills and students curiosity of primary school in understanding science through simple inquiry laboratory activities. Participants are 20 students of 4th grade from one of the primary schools in Bandung. The researcher uses descriptive method to describe student activity during learning, student idea, and student's response in learning, obtained through personal communication, student worksheet and questionnaire. In the first lab activity, researchers used plasticine to explore students' ideas for design 3 objects for exploring science concept namely "floating, drifting and sinking. In the second activity students are directed to apply the concept that has been obtained in the first activity, which is they should selecting and classify red bean and corn with good quality and bad quality that used to be seeds. The results show that critical thinking ability and students curiosity begin look when they design objects that are expected for floating and drifting. Students are enthusiastic about experimenting and trying to recreate if their plasticine design fails. Trial and error activities are also stimulate them to continue their idea to find the right design objects. That concepts can be applied by student in daily life to select and classify seeds with good and less quality, and they are enthusiastic to plant it and compare it growth. Results also show that students enjoy learning, not sleepy and bored, and feel challenged.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Croker, K., et al. (2010). Enhancing The Student Experience of Laboratory Practicals Throught Digital Video Guides. Bioscience Education. Vol 16. Online. Tersedia: www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk.
Dahar, R, W. (1996). “Teori-Teori Belajar”. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Ennis, R. H. (1996) Critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Inch, E. S., et al. (2006). Critical Thinking and Communication: The use of reason in argument. 5th Ed. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Marzano, et al. (1992). Assesing Student Outcomes: Performance Assesment Using the Dimensions of Learning Models. Alexandria, Virginia : Association for Supervision and Currciculum Development.
Rustaman, N., et al. (2003). “Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi”. Bandung: Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi.
Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Critical Thinking. Online. Tersedia: http://www.freeinquiry.com/critical-thinking.html.
Spell, R.M., et al. (2014). Redefining Authentic Research Experiences in Introductory Biology Laboratories and barriers to Their Implementation. CBE-Life Science Education. Vol.13, 102-110. Online. Tersedia: www.lifescied.org.
Sritunga, D., et al. (2011). Culturally Relevant Inquiry Based Laboratory Module Implementation in Upper-Division Genetics and Cell Biology Teaching Laboratories. CBE-Life Science Education. Vol.12, 460-470. Online. Tersedia: www.lifescied.org.
Supriatno, B. (2009). “Uji Langkah Kerja Laboratorium Biologi Sekolah”. Proseding Seminar Nasional Jurusan Pendidikan biologi: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Thohari, K. (2010). Peningkatan Kemampuan Problem Solving melalui Peningkatan Kemampuan Metakognisi. Online. Tersedia: http://journal.um.ac.id.
Wu, J. (2013). Mutation Based Learning to Improve Student Autonomy and Scientific Inquiry Skills in a Large Genetics Laboratory Course. CBE-Life Science Education. Vol.12, 460-470. Online. Tersedia: www.lifescied.org.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v1i1.3879
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.