Thai Undergraduate Student Awareness of Regular and Irregular Grapheme-Phoneme Correspondence

David D. Perrodin

Abstract


Recent events in Thailand in reference to the teaching of phonics for better comprehension of English vocabulary have highlighted the overuse of identifying letter-sound relationships in English by utilizing the familiar Thai orthography to assist developing Thai EFL learners. This paper investigated the long-term effects of using such pedagogy on recognizing regular and irregular Grapheme-Phoneme Correspondences (GPC) in English by Thai undergraduate students. To address this matter, the study used a convenience sampling of 373 first-year university students from 11 general education English classes at a mid-sized private university near Bangkok, Thailand. The familiar English poem I Take It You Already Know was employed for data collection, for it consists of a practical ratio of frequent and infrequent English grapheme-phoneme correspondences. Extensive lists of recognized grapheme-phoneme correspondences were used to identify the frequent or regular, and the infrequent or irregular main phoneme present in each of the 60 most frequently queried content words of the poem. Point-Biserial Correlation was employed to measure the strength of association between the frequency occurrence of the most queried content words from the data set, and the examined weighted word frequency data. The findings suggest that, in general, the Thai undergraduate students demonstrated an overall lack of recognition of regular and irregular Grapheme-Phoneme Correspondences of English. 


Keywords


Grapheme-Phoneme Correspondence; orthography; phonics; pronunciation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Algethami, G. (2016). Long Term Effect of Phonetic Instruction on the Production of /p/ by EFL Arab Learners: An Exploratory Study. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 7(4), 297-304. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2898628

Beale, A. (2019). English Sound-Symbol Correspondences. http://wyrdplay.org/AlanBeale/TS-sounds.html

Brooks, G. (2015). Dictionary of the British English Spelling System. https://books.openedition.org/obp/2183.

Christensen, C. A., & Bowey, J. A. (2005). The Efficacy of Orthographic Rime, Grapheme–Phoneme Correspondence, and Implicit Phonics Approaches to Teaching Decoding Skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(4), 327-349. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0904_1

Fairclough, N. (2010). Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. Routledge.

Frost, R. (2005). Orthographic Systems and Skilled Word Recognition Processes in Reading. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The Science of Reading: A Handbook (272-295). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642.ch15

Fry, E. (2004). Phonics: A Large Phoneme-Grapheme Frequency Count Revised. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(1), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3601_5

Gates, L. (2017). Elegant grapheme-phoneme correspondence: a periodic chart and singularity generalization unify decoding. Annals of Dyslexia, 68(1), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-017-0150-x

Garnham, A. (1985). Psycholinguistics: central topics. Psychology Press.

Gerlach, D. (2016). Reading and spelling difficulties in the ELT classroom. ELT Journal, 71(3), 295-304. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw088

Gontijo, P. F. D., Gontijo, I., & Shillcock, R. (2003). Grapheme—phoneme probabilities in British English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(1), 136-157. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195506

Hanna, P. R., Hanna, J. S., Hodges, R. E., & Rudorf, E. H. (1966). Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

Henderson, L. (2017). Writing systems and reading processes. In Leslie Henderson (Ed.), Orthographies and Reading: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology, Neuropsychology and Linguistics, (11-24). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315107448

Knoepke, J., Richter, T., Isberner, M.-B., Naumann, J., & Neeb, Y. (2014). Phonological recoding, orthographic decoding, and comprehension skills during reading acquisition. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 17(3), 447–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-014-0560-z

Krashen, S. (2001). Does "Pure" Phonemic Awareness Training Affect Reading Comprehension? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 93(2), 356-358. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2001.93.2.356

Krashen, S. (2009). Does intensive decoding instruction contribute to reading comprehension? Knowledge Quest, 37(4), 72-75. http://www.sdkrashen.com/content/articles/decoding_&_comprehension.pdf

Ladkert, K. (2009). Development of English Pronunciation with Phonics. Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1023.4197&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Larsen, L., Kohnen, S., Nickels, L., & McArthur, G. (2015). The Letter-Sound Test (LeST): a reliable and valid comprehensive measure of grapheme–phoneme knowledge. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 20(2), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2015.1037323

Liao, C. H., Kuo, B. C., Deenang, E., & Mok, M. M. C. (2015). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses in reading-related cognitive component among grade four students in Thailand. Educational Psychology, 36(6), 1102-1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1058342

Nensiri, W., & Sukavatee, P. (2018). Developing E-Materials for Teaching Synthetic Phonics to Elementary Students. Journal of Studies in the English Language, 13(2), 119-157. https://www.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jsel/article/view/142803

Oney, B., & Goldman, S. R. (1984). Decoding and comprehension skills in Turkish and English: Effects of the regularity of grapheme-phoneme correspondences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 557-568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.557

Perrodin, D., & Thupatemee, K. (2018). Globalization of English Education Programs: The Case of Eastern Asia University, Thailand. SIKKHA Journal of Education, 5(2), 45-58. https://www.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sikkha/article/view/157733

Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Coltheart, M. (2002). How predictable is spelling? Developing and testing metrics of phoneme-grapheme contingency. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 55(3), 897-915. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980143000640

Pollatsek, A., & Treiman, R. (Eds.). (2015). The Oxford Handbook of Reading. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Reid, G., & Elbeheri, G. (2009). The Routledge companion to dyslexia. Routledge.

Sayeski, K. L., Earle, G. A., Eslinger, R. P., & Whitenton, J. N. (2016). Teacher candidates' mastery of phoneme-grapheme correspondence: massed versus distributed practice in teacher education. Annals of Dyslexia, 67(1), 26-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-016-0126-2

Smith, F. (2004). Understanding Reading. Erlbaum.

Sun, B., Zhu, B., Chen, J., & Zhou, H. (2015). The Effects of Phonological Awareness Training on the Reading Performance by Child EFL Learners in China. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 38(3), 339-354. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2015-0021

Thep-Ackrapong, T. (2005). Teaching English in Thailand: An uphill battle. Journal of Humanities Parithat, 27(1), 51-62. http://ejournals.swu.ac.th/index.php/hm/article/view/632/632

Tokuda, Y. (2016). The Accuracy of Phonological Decoding Skill Among Japanese EFL Learners: Evidence from a Lexical Decision Task. Journals Open Access, 30, 113-126. https://doi.org/10.20806/katejournal.30.0_113

Vaisman, E. E., & Kahn-Horwitz, J. (2019). English foreign language teachers' linguistic knowledge, beliefs, and reported practices regarding reading and spelling instruction. Dyslexia, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1608

Vandervelden, M. C., & Siegel, L. S. (1995). Phonological Recoding and Phoneme Awareness in Early Literacy: A Developmental Approach. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 854-875. https://doi.org/10.2307/748201

Vibulpatanavong, K., & Evans, D. (2019). Phonological awareness and reading in Thai children. Reading and Writing, 32(2), 467-491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9867-0

Watt, T. S. (1954). Brush up on your English: Hints on Pronunciation for visiting Foreigners. (I Take It You Already Know). In Manchester Guardian.

Wheelan, C. J. (2014). Naked statistics stripping the dread from the data. Norton.

Wilairatana, P., Mizutani, K., Kuntonbutr, C., & Tsutomu, K. (2019). The Effect of Final Consonants in the Cognitive Process of Thai Language. Information Engineering Express, 5(1), 37-36. http://www.iaiai.org/journals/index.php/IEE/article/view/313

Williams, C. (2016). Teaching English reading in the Chinese-speaking world: building strategies across scripts. Springer.

Winskel, H., & Iemwanthong, K. (2009). Reading and spelling acquisition in Thai children. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1021-1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9194-6

Wixey, A., & Eamoraphan, S. (2017). Predictive relationships between phonemic awareness, verbal short-term memory, and working memory with spelling achievement among grade 1 students at Thai Christian school, Thailand. Scholar: Human Science, 9(1), 188-208. http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/Scholar/article/view/2303

Yavas, M. (2016). Applied English Phonology, 3rd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.

Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29(4), 600-618. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03210615




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/jetli.v4i1.9839

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of English Teaching and Learning Issues

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License