The Effectiveness of Constructivist Learning Using Guided Discovery Models on The Concept of A Regulatory System for Curiosity and Anti-Narcotics Attitudes

Sulasfiana Alfi Raida, Didi Nur Jamaludin

Abstract


This research aimed to analyze the effectiveness of constructivist learning using guided discovery models on the concept of a regulatory system for curiosity and anti-narcotics attitudes. This research used a quasi-experimental and pre-experimental design. The population was all of the 4th semester MIA classes of SMA Negeri 1 Salatiga which consists of seven classes. Samples were taken with a convenience sampling technique.  MIA 2.4 and 5.4 as the experimental group and MIA 3.4 and 4.4 as the control group. The data in this research were collected by the scale of curiosity and anti-narcotics attitude. Data were analyzed with descriptive analyzed and t-test. The result showed as follows: there is a significant difference at the end of the curiosity and anti-narcotics attitude of constructivist learning using guided discovery model compared with direct instruction model learning; the average of student’s curiosity and anti-narcotics attitude score ≥ 3,00 on constructivist learning using guided discovery model. It is concluded that constructivist learning using a guided discovery model is effectively completed learning outcomes of the curiosity and anti-narcotics attitude on the regulatory system concept.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alfiraida, S. 2018. Identifikasi materi biologi SMA sulit menurut pandangan siswa dan guru SMA se-Kota Salatiga. Journal of Biology Education. 1(2): 209-222.

Anwar, H. 2009. Penilaian sikap ilmiah dalam pembelajaran sains. Jurnal Pelangi Ilmu. 2(5): 102-114.

Binson, B. 2009. Curiosity Based Learning (CBL) program. US-China Education Review, 12 (6):13-22.

Jacobsen, DA., Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. 2009. Metode-metode Pengajaran. Terjemahan Akhmad Fawaid & Khoirul Anam. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Kennedy, D. Hyland, A., & Ryan N. 2007. Writing and using learning outcomes: A practical guide. EUA Bologna Handbook. 3(4-1): 1-30.

Krathwohl, DR. 2002. A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice. 41(4): 212-218.

Laelasari, I & Adisendjaja, Y.H. 2018. Mengeksplorasi kemampuan berpikir kritis dan rasa ingin tahu siswa melalui kegiatan laboratorium inquiry sederhana. Thabiea: Journal of Natural Science Teaching. 1(1): 14-19.

Melani, R., Harlita, & Sugiharto, B. 2012. Pengaruh metode guided discovery learning terhadap sikap ilmiah dan hasil belajar kognitif biologi siswa SMA Negeri 7 Surakarta tahun pelajaran 2011/2012. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi. 4(1): 97-105.

Permendikbud. 2014a.Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No. 59 tentang Kurikulum SMA. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

Permendikbud. 2014b. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No. 104 tentang Pedoman Penilaian Hasil Belajar oleh Pendidik tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajar oleh Pendidik pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

Primantari, VA & Kahono, GB. 2013.Efektivitas kampanye anti penyalahgunaan narkoba terhadap pengetahuan dan sikap remaja akan bahaya penyalahgunaan narkoba.Jurnal Sociologie1(2): 93-97.

Raida, SA. 2017. Penerapan pembelajaran guided discovery terhadap hasil belajar siswa SMA. Jurnal Genetika. 1 (1): 61-77.

Salirawati, D. 2012. Percaya diri, keingintahuan, dan berjiwa wirausaha: tiga karakter penting bagi peserta didik. JPK. 2(2): 213-224.

Utami, YL. 2014. “Pengembangan Instrumen Pengukuran Nilai Karakter Rasa Ingin Tahu (Curiosity) dan Rasa Tidak Mudah Percaya (Skepticism) pada Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar Biologi”. Skripsi. Semarang: Unnes.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v3i1.7023

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.