Ayo Belajar IPA dari Ulama: Pembelajaran Berbasis Socio-Scientific Issues di Abad ke-21
Abstract
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amin, M., Sam, M. I., Sa’adi, Z. T., Hasanuddin, H., Hasanudin, H., & Sholeh, M. A. N. (2015). Himpunan Fatwa MUI Bidang POM dan IPTEK. (F. Mutiara, H. Saputra, & A. Prasetya, Ed.). Jakarta: Erlangga.
Anagün, Ş. S., & Özden, M. (2010). Teacher candidate’s perceptions regarding socio-scientific issues and their competencies in using socio-scientific issues in science and technology instruction. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 981–985. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.271
Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan, K. P. dan K. (2013). Kompetensi Dasar Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP)/ Madrasah Tsanawiyah (MTs). Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Binadja, A. (2005). Pedoman Pengembangan Silabus Pembelajaran Berdasar Kurikulum 2004 Bervisi dan Berpendekatan SETS (Science, Environment, Technology, Society) atau (Sains, Lingkungan, Teknologi, dan Masyarakat). Semarang: Laboratorium SETS Unnes Semarang.
Bybee, R. (1984). Global Problems and Science Education Policy. In R. W. Bybee, J. Carlson, & A. J. McCormack (Ed.), Redesigning Science and Technology Education. Washington, D.C.: National Science Teachers Association.
Cross, D., Taasoobshirazib, G., Hendricksc, S., & Hickey, D. T. (2008). Argumentation: A strategy for improving achievement and revealing scientific identities. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 837–861. http://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701411567
Dinas Penerangan Angkatan Darat, T. N. I. (2016). Bios 44 Dan Nusantara Gapo 44, Teknologi Untuk Restorasi Gambut. Diambil dari https://tniad.mil.id/2016/09/bios-44-dan-nusantara-gapo-44-teknologi-untuk-restorasi-gambut-2/
Erduran, S., Ardac, D., & Yakmaci-Guzel, B. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Case studies of pre-service secondary science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 1–14.
Golshani, M. (2004). Issues in Islam and Science. Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.
Jasin, M. (2013). Ilmu Alamiah Dasar. (M. Ibrahim & M. T. Hidayat, Ed.) (20 ed.). Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Kang, M. hee, Heo, H., Jo, I. H., Shin, J., & Seo, J. (2010). Developing an educational performance indicator for new millennium learners. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(2), 157–170. http://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782567
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2017). Buku Guru Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Louis, R. C. (2012). A Case Study Exploring Technology Integration and Incorporation of 21st Century Skills in Elementary Classrooms. Boston, Massachusetts.
McComas, W. (2014). Socio-scientific Issue-based Instruction. In W. F.McComas (Ed.), The Language of Science Education: An Expand Glossary of Key Terms and Concepts in Science Teaching and Language (hal. 100). Sense Publishers. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203597125
McNeill, K. L. (2009). Teachers’ use of curriculum to support students in writing scientific arguments to explain phenomena. Science Education, 93(2), 233–268. http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20294
National Science Teachers Association. (2003). Standards for science teacher preparation.
Nuangchalerm, P. (2009). Development of Socioscientific Issues-Based Teaching for Preservice Science Teachers. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 239–243.
Osborne, J. (2005). The Role of Argument in Science Education. In K. Boersma, M. Goedhart, O. De Jong, & H. Eijkelhof (Ed.), Research And The Quality of Science Education (hal. 367–380). Dordrecht: Springer. Diambil dari www.springeronline.com
Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2015). P21 Framework Defintion. Partnership for 21st Century Learning. Washington, D.C.: The Partneship for 21st Century Learning. Diambil dari http://www.p21.org/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf
Topcu, M. S., Sadler, T. D., & Yilmaz‐Tuzun, O. (2010). Preservice Science Teachers’ Informal Reasoning about Socioscientific Issues: The influence of issue context. International Journal of Science Education, 32(18), 2475–2495.
Wisudawati, A. W., & Sulistyowati, E. (2014). Metodologi Pembelajaran IPA. Yogyakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A Research-based Framework for Socioscientific Issues Education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v1i2.4439
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.