Scientific Approach in K-13; the Impact on the Quality of the Learning Process and Outcomes in MAN
Abstract
The Kurikulum 2013 –Indonesia's novel Curriculum invented in 2013– is implemented through activity-based learning using a scientific approach. Curriculum changes do not only occur in the dimensions of the plan/document, but in its implementation in the quality of the process which has an impact on learning outcomes. This research aims to determine the implementation of the Kurikulum 2013 scientific approach and its impact on the quality of the learning processes and outcomes at MAN in Lampung Province. The research uses a mixed methods with sequential mixed methods design. The respondents consisted of 26 teachers and 126 students. Data were collected by conducting interview, observation, documentation, and questionnaire. The validity was tested by Pearson’s validity and Cronbach Alpha reliability. The results showed that teachers can apply a scientific approach to the implementation of the Kurikulum 2013 well. It can be seen from the teacher’s ability to prepare lesson plans, though there are some teachers (working period of 21 to 30 years) who are constrained during the learning process, such as observing the learning and not being able in presenting the media. The scientific approach has a very good impact on the quality of the learning process and outcomes. It can be seen by the increase in student learning outcomes.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Beghetto, RA, & Corazza, GE (2019). Dynamic Perspectives On Creativity: New Directions For Theory, Research, And Practice In Education.
Brandenburg, R. (2016). Brandenburg et al 2016 Teacher Education - Innovation Intervention & Impact.
Brooks, AL, Eds, NV, Coulson, G., & Ferrari, D. (2019). Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation. In Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation (Vol.265). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06134-0
Faisal. (2014). Success in Guarding 2013 Curriculum in Elementary School.
Fatmawati, L., Sukidin, S., & Suyadi, B. (2018). Differences in Student Learning Outcomes through a Conventional Approach with a Scientific Approach in the Basic Competencies of Management Functions of Class X Students at Public High School 4 Jember, 2016/2017 Academic Year. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION: Scientific Journal of Educational Sciences, Economics and Social Sciences, 11 (2), 134. https://doi.org/10.19184/jpe.v11i2.6460
Gosper, M., Ifenthaler, D., Technologies, UL, & Education, H. (2014). Curriculum Models for the 21st Century. In Curriculum Models for the 21st Century. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7366-4
Gregerson, MB, Snyder, HT, & Kaufman, JC (2013). Teaching creatively and teaching creativity. In Teaching Creatively and Teaching Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5185-3
Hakim, L. (2017). Analysis of Differences Between Curriculums. The Scientific Journal of Didactics, 17 (2), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.22373/jid.v16i1.590.5
Ho, ONK (2018). Rethinking the Curriculum. In Rethinking the Curriculum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8902-2
Ihsan, RS and H. (2014). The Scientific Approach in the Implementation of the 2013 Curriculum Based on the Study of Learning Psychology Theory. Edutech, 1 (2), 183–195.
Jacobs, GM, & Renandya, WA (2019). Student centered cooperative learning: Linking concepts in education to promote student learning.
Jedemark, M. (2019). A scientific approach in the assessment of the school-based part of the teacher education program in Sweden. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51 (3), 420–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1567820
Jilin, L. (2017). Curriculum and practice for children's contextualized learning. In Curriculum and Practice for Children's Contextualized Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55769-3
John W. Creswell, CNP (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design (International Student Edition): Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Mason, W., Morris, K., Webb, C., Daniels, B., Featherstone, B., Bywaters, P., Mirza, N., Hooper, J., Brady, G., Bunting, L., & Scourfield, J. (2020). Toward Full Integration of Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Case Study Research: Insights From Investigating Child Welfare Inequalities. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14 (2), 164–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819857972
Muslim, SR (2017). The Influence of Using the Project Based Learning Model on the Mathematical Problem Solving Ability of Students. Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education, 1 (2), 88–95.
Pahrudin, A., Ahid, N., Huda, S., Ardianti, N., Putra, FG, Anggoro, BS, & Joemsittiprasert, W. (2020). The effects of the ECIRR learning model on mathematical reasoning ability in the curriculum perspective 2013: Integration on student learning motivation. European Journal of Educational Research, 9 (2), 675–685. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.675
Pelto, PJ (2015). What is so new about mixed methods? Qualitative Health Research, 25 (6), 734–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315573209
Peppler, K. (2017). Critical Literacies. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Out-of-School Learning. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385198.n67
Permendikbud. (2016). Permendikbud No. 22 of 2016. 1–15.
Pratiwi, DD (2019). Development of Linear Algebra Teaching Materials Based on Islamic Values with a Scientific Approach. Decimal: Mathematical Journal, 2 (2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v2i2.4200
Purwanto, BE, Jatmiko, A., Pahrudin, A., Munifah, Wardhani, S., Purnama, S., & Joemsittiprasert, W. (2020). The Implementation Of Cooperative Learning To Developed Management Of Language Learning System. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8 (1), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.675251
Raharjo, SB (2013). Evaluation of Education Quality Trends in Indonesia. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 16 (2), 511–532. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v16i2.1129
Rogers, KB (2019). Curriculum for high ability learners: issues, trends, and practices. In Asia Pacific Journal of Education (Vol. 39, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2018.1504857
Roth, WM, & Friesen, N. (2014). History and the relationship between scientific and pedagogical knowledge: anatomy lectures then and now. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46 (2), 180–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.773597
Rusman. (2017). Learning & Learning Process-Oriented Education Standards. Prenadamedia Group.
Saddhono, K. (2018). Implementation of the Revised 2013 Curriculum through the Implementation of the Scientific Approach in Pacitan District High Schools. https://doi.org/10.31227/OSF.IO/W5Z62
Siskandar, -. (2017). Analysis of the Role of Teachers and Principals of Madrasahs in Implementing the 2013 Curriculum. Sociohumanities, 19 (2), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v19i2.12194
Stacey, O., De Lazzari, G., Grayson, H., Griffin, H., Jones, E., Taylor, A., & Thomas, D. (2018). The Globalization of Science Curricula. In IEA Research for Education (Vol. 3). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71532-2
Sumiarwan, I. (2017). The Effect of 2013 Curriculum Policy Implementation on Learning Management to Achieve Learning Quality. Khazanah Akademia, 01 (01), 1–8.
Tan, O., & Low, WLE (2019). Teacher Education in the 21st Century. In Teacher Education in the 21st Century. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.77621
Teo, JE, Deng, Z., Lee, CK-E., & Lim-ratnam, C. (2013). Globalization and the Singapore Curriculum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-57-4
Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., Higgins-D'Alessandro, A., Ozkan, M., Balci, S., Kayan, S., Is, E., Yoon, J., Järvinen , T., & Nilsen, T. (2016). Teacher Quality, Instructional Quality and Student Outcomes. Relationships Across Countries, Cohorts and Time (A Series of In-depth Analyzes Based on Data of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)). In Comparative Education (Vol. 52, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2016.1220128
Webster, RS, & Whelen, JD (2019). Rethinking Reflection and Ethics for Teachers. In Rethinking Reflection and Ethics for Teachers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9401-1
Wijaya Kuswanto, C., & Dinda Pratiwi, D. (2020). Thematic-Based Development of Physical Education Teaching Materials for Early Childhood. Al-Athfal: Journal of Children's Education, 6 (1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-athfal.2020.61-05
Yu, S., Ally, M., & Tsinakos, A. (2020). Bridging Human and Machine: Future Education with Intelligence Emerging Technologies and Pedagogies in the Curriculum. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/edukasia.v15i2.7913
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexed By:
