- Focus and Scope
- Section Policies
- Peer Review Process
- Publication Frequency
- Open Access Policy
- Publication Ethic
- Plagiarism Check
- Indexing
Focus and Scope
Articles to be received and published in the Journal of EDUKASIA are included in the scope of inclusive Islamic Education
- Curriculum development and implementation of inclusive Islamic education;
- Learning media of inclusive Islamic education;
- Learning strategy of inclusive Islamic education;
- Learning evaluation of inclusive Islamic education;
- Policy in inclusive Islamic education;
- Inclusive Islamic education Philosophy.
- Management of Islamic Education
- History and thoughts of Inclusive Islamic education figures.
Section Policies
Artikel
 Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
Peer Review Process
Edukasia: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam follows double-blind peer review policy. The paper is sent to many reviewers (the experts in the respective field) to review the paper in light of the journal's guidelines and features of a quality research paper. For papers that require changes, the same reviewers will be used to ensure that the quality of the revised paper is acceptable.
Edukasia: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam maintains the standards of peer review while increasing the efficiency of the process.
All research articles published in Edukasia: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam undergo full peer review, key characteristics of which are listed below:
- All research articles are reviewed by at least two suitably qualified experts.
- All publication decisions are made by the journals’ Editors-in-Chief on the basis of the reviews provided
- Members of the international Editorial Boards lend insight, advice, and guidance to the Editors-in-Chief generally and to assist decision making on specific submissions
- Managing Editors and Editorial Assistants provide the administrative support that allows the journal to maintain the integrity of peer review while delivering rapid turnaround and maximum efficiency to authors, reviewers, and editors alike.
- The journal additionally benefits through the manuscript referral process from the high-quality peer review conducted by established journals.
Peer review of referred papers:
Editors of Edukasia: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam will decide promptly whether to accept, reject, or request revisions of referred papers based on the reviews and editorial insight of the supporting journals. In addition, Editors will have the option of seeking additional reviews when needed. The authors will be advised when Editors decide further review is needed.
Peer review of novel submissions:
Articles submitted directly to Edukasia: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam will be fully peer-reviewed by at least two appropriately qualified experts in the field selected by the Editor-in-Chief. The Editor-in-Chief or a designated member of the Editorial Board will then decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions based on the reviews and comments received.
Editors will decide whether each submission reports well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper. Assessments of priority will not be a factor in decision-making, but all papers must make an incremental or novel addition to the literature.
Publication Frequency
The EDUKASIA journal is published twice a year (February and August). Each issue number ( issue ) amounts to at least five (5) article titles.
Open Access Policy
Jurnal Edukasia provides open acces journals that can be used and utilized by all readers, especially in the field of Islamic studies. Through open access Jurnal Edukasia is expected to provide transfer of science and knowledge globally.
Publication Ethic
Publication of articles in peer review journals is an important model for our journals. It is necessary to agree on the expected ethical standards of conduct for all parties involved in the act of publishing: authors, journal editors, bestarial partners and publishers.
Publication Decision
The editor is responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal should be published or not. Editor refers to the editorial board of the journal policy and is limited by legal provisions, such as defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor can talk to other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair Play
Editors in evaluating script content based on their intellectual views irrespective of race, sex, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship or political philosophy of the author.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff should not disclose any information about the manuscript to anyone other than the author, best partner or reviewer, other editorial advisors, and publishers.
Any manuscript received by a reviewer or a bestari partner shall be treated as a confidential document. They may not be displayed or discussed with others except as authorized by the editors.
Conflict of Interest
Unpublished material in a submitted manuscript should not be used in the research editors themselves without the written consent of the author.
Confidential information or ideas obtained through peer review should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider scripts in which they have a competitive, collaborative, or other conflict of interest with any of the authors, companies, or institutions associated with the paper.
The reviewer's job
Provide feedback on Editorial team decisions
Peer review helps editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communications with authors can also assist authors in improving the articles they create.
Speed
Each selected partner who feels qualified to review the manuscript provided by the editor or out of his or her intellectual competence must immediately refuse and not conduct the review process.
Standards of Objectivity
The review process should be done objectively. The writer's personal criticism is inappropriate. Reviewers must provide their views clearly and accompanied by supporting arguments.
Source Statement
Reviewers shall identify other relevant works that have not been quoted by the author. Any statement which results from observations, derivations, or arguments previously reported shall be accompanied by relevant quotations. The best partner or reviewer should also consider the substantial similarity or overlap between the text being considered and other published papers.
Appropriate recognition of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of their research.
Author's Duties
Reporting Standards
The author of the original research report must present an accurate report of the research and study conducted. The data taken should be accurately written in the research report. Manuscript A should be detailed and have sufficient referrals to enable others to refer well. A fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate report is unethical and unacceptable behavior.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and / or words of others then they shall mengukitnya correctly according to the rules.
A writer should not publish a script that describes essentially the same research in more than one major journal or publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently is unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
Script Authorship
Authors should be limited to those who have contributed significantly to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of reported research. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where others have participated in certain substantive aspects of a research project, they must be recognized or registered as contributors.
Suitable authors should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and other authors are included in the manuscript, and all authors must have seen and approved the final version of the manuscript and have agreed to be published.
Hazard and Human or Animal Subject
If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have an unusual danger inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify this in the manuscript.
A fundamental mistake in published works
When an author discovers significant errors or inaccuracies in his / her own published work, it is the duty of the authors to promptly notify the journal or publisher editors and work closely with editors to retract or correct the manuscript.
Plagiarism Check
Pendidikana uses the Turnitin tool to check plagiarism. maximum plagiarism 20%.
Indexed By:
