Sustainability of Sharia Fintech: The Role of Perceived Benefit And Perceived Risk

Agus Supriyanto, Anis Fagustina

Abstract


This study aims to examine the influence of Perceived Benefit and Perceived Risk on Intention to use Sharia Fintech and its impact on the sustainability of Sharia Fintech. The research sample consisted of 137 respondents selected using purposive sampling method. The results of the study indicate that perceptions of benefits and risks have a significant influence on users' intention to adopt Sharia Fintech. Users' intention, as a direct result of perceptions of benefits and risks, plays a crucial role in maintaining the sustainability of the Sharia Fintech industry. Recommendations for future research include the development of strategies focused on enhancing perceptions of benefits and reducing perceptions of risks associated with the use of Sharia Fintech. Furthermore, further research is needed to understand other factors that may influence users' intentions and the sustainability of the Sharia Fintech industry, in order to formulate more comprehensive and sustainable development strategies.


Keywords


Perceived Benefit, Perceived Risk, Sustainibility, Sharia Fintech

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Shari, Hussein Ahmed, and M A Lokhande. 2023. “The Relationship between the Risks of Adopting FinTech in Banks and Their Impact on the Performance.” Cogent Business & Management 10(1): 2174242.

Almaqtari, Faozi A. 2024. “The Moderating Role of IT Governance on the Relationship between FinTech and Sustainability Performance.” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 10(2): 100267.

Ascarya, Ascarya, and Ali Sakti. 2022. “Designing Micro-Fintech Models for Islamic Micro Financial Institutions in Indonesia.” International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management 15(2): 236–54.

Bajunaied, Kholoud, Nazimah Hussin, and Suzilawat Kamarudin. 2023. “Behavioral Intention to Adopt FinTech Services: An Extension of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 9(1): 100010.

Cheng, T C Edwin, David Y C Lam, and Andy C L Yeung. 2006. “Adoption of Internet Banking: An Empirical Study in Hong Kong.” Decision support systems 42(3): 1558–72.

Featherman, Mauricio S, and Paul A Pavlou. 2003. “Predicting E-Services Adoption: A Perceived Risk Facets Perspective.” International journal of human-computer studies 59(4): 451–74.

Firmansyah, Egi Arvian, Masairol Masri, Muhammad Anshari, and Mohd Hairul Azrin Besar. 2022. “Factors Affecting Fintech Adoption: A Systematic Literature Review.” FinTech 2(1): 21–33.

Hassan, M Kabir, and Mustafa Raza Rabbani. 2023. “Sharia Governance Standards and the Role of AAOIFI: A Comprehensive Literature Review and Future Research Agenda.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 14(5): 677–98.

Jha, Shweta, and Ramesh Chandra Dangwal. 2024. “Determinants of Investment-Related FinTech Services among Retail Investors of India: A Multi-Group Analysis Using PLS-SEM.” Journal of Modelling in Management.

Kumar, Jitender, and Vinki Rani. 2022. “Journey of Financial Technology (Fintech): A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda.” Exploring the latest trends in management literature: 89–108.

Kunhibava, Sherin et al. 2023. “Selected Issues in the Use of RegTech in the Islamic and Conventional Financial Markets.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research.

Mohamad Shafi, Roslina, and Yan-Ling Tan. 2023. “Evolution in Islamic Capital Market: A Bibliometric Analysis.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 14(8): 1474–95.

Nagimova, Almira Z. 2023. “Islamic Finance in Kazakhstan: The View of Experts.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 14(8): 1195–1215.

Pandey, Dharen Kumar et al. 2023. “Mapping the Landscape of FinTech in Banking and Finance: A Bibliometric Review.” Research in International Business and Finance: 102116.

Putri, Gustita Arnawati, Ari Kuncara Widagdo, and Doddy Setiawan. 2023. “Analysis of Financial Technology Acceptance of Peer to Peer Lending (P2P Lending) Using Extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 9(1): 100027.

Qudah, Hanan et al. 2023. “Islamic Finance in the Era of Financial Technology: A Bibliometric Review of Future Trends.” International Journal of Financial Studies 11(2): 76.

Sharma, Akhilesh, Arvind Mohan, Amar Johri, and Mohammad Asif. 2024. “Determinants of Fintech Adoption in Agrarian Economy: Study of UTAUT Extension Model in Reference to Developing Economies.” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 10(2): 100273.

Yiu, Chi Shing, Kevin Grant, and David Edgar. 2007. “Factors Affecting the Adoption of Internet Banking in Hong Kong—Implications for the Banking Sector.” International journal of information management 27(5): 336–51.

Yüksel, Serkan, Gülin Kalyoncu, and Caner Özdurak. 2023. “Constructing an Index for Participation Finance.” Borsa Istanbul Review 23(4): 895–905.

Yuli, Sri Budi Cantika, and Mochamad Rofik. 2023. “Unleashing Open Innovation: A Decomposition Nexus of Sharia-Compliant Financing and Job Creation.” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 9(4): 100162.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/malia.v8i1.26635

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 MALIA: Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

images

http://journal.stainkudus.ac.id/indexing/moraref.jpg