Open Journal Systems
THE HISTORICAL-EPISTEMOLOGICAL CONSTRUCTION OF THE HASAN HADITH: Al-Tirmidhi's Methodological Innovation
Abstract
This study examines the historical context and intellectual rationale behind Imam al-Tirmidhi’s formulation of the hasan hadith category, a significant methodological innovation that emerged in response to the limitations of the prevailing sahih–da‘if dichotomy in the formative period of Hadith scholarship. The research focuses on the dynamics of hadith transmission during the second and third centuries AH, a period characterized by the expansion of transmission networks, varying levels of narrator reliability, and the circulation of numerous reports that could not be adequately classified as either fully authentic or entirely weak. Employing a historical and comparative approach through an extensive review of primary and secondary sources, this study investigates the disciplinary needs that motivated al-Tirmidhi’s conceptualization of the hasan category and explores its role in organizing the increasingly heterogeneous body of hadith literature. The findings demonstrate that the emergence of the hasan category constituted a methodological response to the intellectual realities of the Abbasid era, providing an intermediate classification for narrations that occupied a position between acceptance and rejection. This innovation clarified evaluative boundaries, facilitated a more systematic management of the expanding hadith corpus, and contributed to the refinement of hadith criticism. The academic contribution of this study lies in its reinterpretation of the hasan category not merely as a technical classification but as an adaptive epistemological framework shaped by historical necessity, thereby offering a deeper understanding of the relationship between socio-intellectual developments and the evolution of ‘ilm mustalah al-hadith.
Penelitian ini mengkaji konteks historis dan rasionalitas intelektual di balik perumusan kategori hadis hasan oleh Imam al-Tirmidzi, yang merupakan salah satu inovasi metodologis penting dalam perkembangan ilmu hadis. Kategori ini muncul sebagai respons terhadap keterbatasan dikotomi sahih–da‘if yang mendominasi fase awal kajian hadis. Fokus penelitian diarahkan pada dinamika transmisi hadis pada abad ke-2 dan ke-3 H, suatu periode yang ditandai oleh meluasnya jaringan periwayatan, beragamnya tingkat kredibilitas para perawi, serta beredarnya banyak riwayat yang tidak dapat diklasifikasikan secara memadai sebagai hadis yang sepenuhnya sahih maupun sepenuhnya da‘if. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan historis dan komparatif melalui telaah literatur terhadap sumber-sumber primer dan sekunder yang relevan, penelitian ini bertujuan menjelaskan kebutuhan keilmuan yang melatarbelakangi lahirnya kategori hasan serta menganalisis perannya dalam menata korpus hadis yang semakin heterogen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kemunculan kategori hasan merupakan solusi metodologis terhadap realitas intelektual pada era Abbasiyah, dengan menyediakan ruang klasifikasi menengah bagi riwayat-riwayat yang berada di antara penerimaan dan penolakan. Inovasi ini memperjelas batas-batas evaluatif dalam kritik hadis, memfasilitasi pengelolaan korpus hadis yang terus berkembang secara lebih sistematis, serta berkontribusi pada penyempurnaan metodologi kritik hadis. Kontribusi akademik penelitian ini terletak pada reinterpretasi kategori hasan bukan semata-mata sebagai klasifikasi teknis, melainkan sebagai kerangka epistemologis yang adaptif dan lahir dari kebutuhan historis, sehingga memberikan pemahaman yang lebih mendalam mengenai hubungan antara perkembangan sosial-intelektual dengan evolusi ‘ilm mustalah al-hadith.
Keywords
References
Afabih, Abdillah, and Viki Junianto. 2022. “Examining Ibn Arabi’s Kashf Method on the Authenticity of Hadith.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis 23 (1): 111–24. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2022.2301-06.
Alawi, Muhammad. 2000. Minhal Al-Latif. Maktabah Al-Maliki.
Al-Bukhari, Muḥammad ibn Ismā‘īl. 1998. Daʻif al-Adab al-Mufrad. Cetakan ke-4. Edited by Muḥammad Nāṣir al-Dīn Al-Albānī. Dar al-Ṣadīq li al-Nashr wa al-Tawzī‘.
Al-Khatib al-Baghdadi, Abu Bakr Ahmad ibn Ali ibn Thabit. 1357. Al-Kifayah Fi ’Ilm al-Riwayah. Edited by Abu Abd Allah al-Surqi and Ibrahim Hamdi al-Madani. Jam’iyyat Da’irat al-Ma’arif al-’Uthmaniyyah.
Al-Suyuti, Jalal al-Din Abd al-Rahman ibn Abi Bakr. 1996. Tadrib Al-Rawi Fi Sharh Taqrib al-Nawawi. 1st ed. 1-2. Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilamiyah.
Anam, Wahidul, and Mubaidi Sulaeman. 2023. “Exploring Hadith Hasan: A Fresh Perspective al-Jami’ al-Sahih al-Sunan al-Tirmidzi.” Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis 8 (1): 55–72. https://doi.org/10.15575/diroyah.v8i1.29218.
‘Asqalani, Ahmad bin Ali bin Muhammad bin Hajar al-. 2021. Nuzhah al-Nazar fi Tawdhih Nukhbat al-Fikr fi Mustalah Ahl al-Athar. Cetakan ketiga. Edited by Abdullah bin Dhaifullah al-Ruhayli. Peneliti / Penyunting.
‘Asqalani, Ibn Hajar al-. 2014. Tahdzib Al-Tahdzib. 1st ed. Edited by Ibrahim al-Zayyib and ‘Adil Murshid. Mu’assasah al-Risalah.
Baiquni, Ach. 2021. “Melacak Teori Kualitas Hadis Dalam Kitab Al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaḥīḥ al-Sunan al-Tirmīdzī.” Al-Bukhari: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis 4 (1): 68–80. https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v4i1.2468.
Bin Yaakob, Mohd Aizul, and Roshimah Binti Shamsudin. 2021. “Istilah Hasan Menurut Al-Daraqutni Dalam Kitab Al-‘Ilal Al-Waridah Fi Al-Ahadith Al-Nabawiyyah.” Journal Of Hadith Studies, December 1, 9–23. https://doi.org/10.33102/johs.v6i2.146.
“Corroboration of Hadith Hassan Legaeri Considering GreatMuhaddiseen’s Statements.” 2021. Fahm-i-Islam 4 (2). https://doi.org/10.37605/fahmiislam.v4i2.269.
Fadhil, Azhar, Kasman Kasman, and Pujiono Pujiono. 2023. “Methodology For Determining The Quality Of Hadith Nashiruddin Al-Albani (Analysis Of The Book Silsilat Al-Ahadits Al-Shahihah And Silsilat Al-Ahadits Al-Dha’ifah).” International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences 4 (4): 746–54. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i4.704.
Fatihunnada, Fatihunnada. 2017. “The Development of Hadith Study Controversy in Indonesia: A Study of Miṣbāḥ al-Ẓulām by Muhajirin Amsar al-Dari.” Ulumuna 21 (2): 345–69. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v21i2.276.
Fian, Khafifatul, and Munawir. 2023. “Komparasi Kehujjahan Hadits Dha’if Perspektif Imam Abu Hanifah Dan Imam Ahmad Bin Hanbal.” Tafáqquh: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Keislaman 11 (1): 27–39. https://doi.org/10.52431/tafaqquh.v11i1.1169.
Gülteki̇N, Hikmet. 2020. “Tarihi Tenkit Metodunda Isnâd Sisteminin Yeri Ve Münekkidlerin Tenkidlerindeki Çelişki Ve Farkliliklar.” Journal of International Social Research 13 (69): 337–53. https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2020.3962.
Gümüş, Fatih. 2021. “Hasen Hadis Istılahının Gelişiminde İbnü’s Salâh’ın Etkisi.” Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi 25 (3): 1231–52. https://doi.org/10.18505/cuid.969983.
Ibn Rajab al-Hanbali, Zainuddin Abdurrahman bin Ahmad bin Rajab bin al-Hasan as-Salami al-Baghdadi ad-Dimasyqi. 1987. Syarh ‘Ilal at-Tirmidzi. Cetakan pertama. Edited by Dr Hammam Abdurrahim Said. Maktabah al-Manar.
Ihrom, Muhammad Nur, Rahmad Egi Cahyono, Salman Lokollo, et al. 2024. Hadits Dha’if Dan Hukum Mengamalkannya. no. 02. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62359/dirayah.v4i2.252.
Iraqi, Abu al-Fadhl ’Abd ar-Rahim bin al-Husain al-’. 2021. Alfiyah Al-’Iraqi. Edisi ketiga. Edited by Abd al-Muhsin bin Muhammad al-Qasim.
Kamil, Abdul. 2024. “Al-Hadith Al-Gharib in the Discourse of Hadith Studies; The Authenticity and The Authority.” Journal Of Hadith Studies, December 1, 136–45. https://doi.org/10.33102/johs.v9i2.320.
Maheningsih, Desi Dwi. 2023. “Analysis of the Hujjah Level of Sahih and Hasan Hadiths.” Sinergi International Journal of Islamic Studies 1 (2): 67–75. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijis.v1i2.80.
Mighwar, Muhammad Al, and Engkos Kosasih. 2025. “Metode al-Jarh wa Ta’dil Kitab Siyar A’lam an-Nubala Karya Az-Dzahabi Studi Kasus Ibnu Darastaweh.” Journal for Islamic Studies 8 (2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v8i2.1473.
Miski. 2022. “Hadis Iftirāq Dalam Literatur Otoritatif: Potret Jaringan Dan Kepentingan.” Mashdar: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis 4 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.15548/mashdar.v4i1.4370.
Nuraini, Nuraini. 2024. “Analyzing Hadith Sanad Validity: Steps to Assess Acceptance and Authenticity.” El-Sunan: Journal of Hadith and Religious Studies 2 (1): 56–69. https://doi.org/10.22373/el-sunan.v2i1.5463.
Nurmilasari and Muhammad Ali. 2025. “Ulumul Hadist (Sejarah Pertumbuhan Dan Perkembangan Hadist).” Mahad Aly Journal Of Islamic Studies 4 (2): 169–83. https://doi.org/10.63398/1j6c4783.
Nurudin, Muhammad. 2015. Revitalisasi Hadis Da’if Pada Era Global (Studi Kasus Jama’ah Al-Waqi’ah di Cluwak, Pati ). 1 (2).
“Optimizing Islamic Education Towards the Golden Era of Indonesia.” n.d. Accessed August 27, 2025. https://pasca.jurnalikhac.ac.id/index.php/tijie/article/view/105.
Rachman, Abdul, Engkos Kosasih, and Isra Mardi. 2025. “Perkembangan Madrasah Hadis Di Basrah, Kufah, Dan Syam: Kajian Historis Dan Metodologis.” Cakrawala: Journal of Religious Studies and Global Society 2 (1): 83–97. https://doi.org/10.63142/cakrawala.v2i1.79.
Rambe, Mgr Sinomba, Jannatul Husna, and Waharjani Waharjani. 2023. “The Law Of Practicing Dhaif Hadith In Fadhail A’mal.” Kontemplasi: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 10 (2): 257–72. https://doi.org/10.21274/kontem.2022.10.2.257-272.
Salah, Ibn al-. 1986. Muqaddimah Ibn Shalah. Cet. 1. Dar al-Fikr al-Mu’asir.
Salim, Agus. 2019. “Studi Analisis Kodifikasi Hadis.” Jurnal Hikmah.
Snober, Ahmad. 2020. “7. Hadith Criticism in the Levant in the Twentieth Century: From Ẓāhir al-Isnād to ʿilal al-Ḥadīth.” In Modern Hadith Studies, by Belal Abu-Alabbas, Christopher Melchert, and Michael Dann. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474441810-012.
Suhendra, Ahmad. 2015. “Kriteria Hadis Hasan Menurut Al-Suyûtî Dalam al-Jâmi‘ al-Saghîr.” MUTAWATIR 4 (2): 342. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2014.4.2.342-355.
Tahhan, Mahmud al-. 2004. Taysir Mustalah Al-Hadith. 10th ed. Maktabat al-Ma’arif li-l-Nashr wa-l-Tawzi’.
Tirmidhi, Abu Isa al-. 1409. Ilal Al-Tirmidhi al-Kabir. Edited by Abu Talib al-Qadi. Alam al-Kutub; Maktabat al-Nahdah al-Arabiyyah.
Tirmidzi. 1975. Sunan at-Tirmidzi. Cetakan ke-2. 5 jilid. Perusahaan Perpustakaan dan Percetakan Mustafa al-Babi al-Halabi.
Wahab, Fatkhul. 2023. “Kualitas Hadis Shahih, Hasan, Dhaif Sebagai Hujjah Dalam Hukum Islam.” MAQASHID Jurnal Hukum Islam 6 (1): 15–32. https://doi.org/10.35897/maqashid.v6i1.1009.
Watukila, Slamad. 2024. “Historiografi Hadis Di Masa Mutaqaddimin Dalam Pandangan Mustafa Azami.” Amsal Al-Qur’an: Jurnal Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis 1 (3): 221–35. https://doi.org/10.63424/amsal.v1i3.126.
Yuslem, Nawir, Sulidar Sulidar, and Muhammad Qomarullah. 2024. “Ibn Ḥajar’s Thoughts On Criticism Of Hadith Narrators: A Study Of The Book Lisān Al-Mizān.” El-Ghiroh 22 (1): 87–102. https://doi.org/10.37092/el-ghiroh.v22i1.722.
Yusuf, Ismail. 2018. “Sejarah Perkembangan Hadis Dan Metodologinya Pada Abad III Hijriah.” Jurnal Al-Asas.
DOI: 10.21043/riwayah.v12i1.34867
How To Cite This :
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.















