Open Journal Systems
PEOPLES’ HADITH IN DATING HADITH DISCUSSION: Reviewing Another Way to Track the Initial Tradition
Abstract
This study aims to explain and assess the Peoples' Hadith as part of a historical approach that can be used in Dating Hadith. The criticism of the inauthenticity of the hadith has been widely discussed by skeptical orientalists. The most basic reason for this doubt is that there are no written hadith documents in the era of the Prophet that can be known in the present era. The method they use is the dating of hadith; a method that seeks to find out the source of the earliest hadith documents by determining their age and origin. So far, the dating efforts made by Motzky and Nabia Abbott ended in the 2nd century AH. The difference of a century makes this effort still not sufficient to provide an absolute refutation of orientalist skepticism. Based on the descriptive-analytical method, the author finds that People's Hadith has a novelty in terms of viewpoint in the form of the need to look at document sources in the 1st century AH. through communities outside of Muslims, especially the Bedouin. Due to the widening of the scope of this historical search, the implication that will arise is the discovery of prophetic documents that will be obtained by historians or Islamic scholars with sources that come from the Prophet’s Era in the 7th century AH.
[Ahli Hadis dalam Diskursus Penanggalan Hadis: Meninjau Cara Lain untuk Melacak Tradisi Awal. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan dan menilai Peoples’ Hadith sebagai bagian dari pendekatan sejarah yang dapat digunakan dalam Dating Hadith. Kritik terhadap ketidak-otentikan hadis telah banyak didiskusikan oleh skeptical orientalists. Alasan yang paling mendasar dari keraguan tersebut sebab tidak adanya dokumen hadis tertulis di era Nabi yang bisa diketahui di era sekarang. Metode yang mereka gunakan yakni dating hadith; sebuah metode yang berupaya mencari tahu sumber dokumen hadis paling awal dengan penentuan umur dan asal-muasalnya. Sejauh ini, upaya dating yang dilakukan oleh Motzky dan Nabia Abbott berakhir pada abad ke 2 H. Adanya selisih satu abad menjadikan usaha tersebut masih tidak cukup untuk memberikan sanggahan penolakan yang mutlak atas keskeptisan orientalis. Berdasarkan metode deskriptif-analitis, penulis menemukan bahwa Poeples’ Hadith memiliki kebaharuan dari segi viewpoint berupa perlunya memandang sumber dokumen abad ke 1 H. melalui komunitas-komunitas yang berada di luar muslim, terutama kepada suku Badui. Oleh karena melebarnya ruang lingkup penelusuran sejarah ini, implikasi yang akan muncul yakni adanya penemuan-penemuan dokumen nabi yang akan didapatkan oleh para ahli sejarah atau pengkaji islam dengan sumber yang memang berasal dari Nabi pada abad ke-7 H.]
Keywords
References
A’dzami. M. M. (2005). Sejarah Teks Al-Qur’an dari Wahyu sampai Kompilasi; Kajian perbandingan dengan perjanjian lama dan perjanjian baru, terj. Sohirin Solihin dkk. Jakarta: Gema Insani.
A’dzami, M. M. (1978). Studies in Hadith Methodology and Literature. America: American Trust Publications.
Abbott, N. (1949). "A Ninth-Century Fragment of the" Thousand Nights" New Light on the Early History of the Arabian Nights." Journal of Near Eastern Studies 8.3: 129-164.
Abbott, N. (1957). Studies in Arabic Literary Papyri. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Amin, K. (2003) “Book review: The origins of Islamic Jurisprudence”, in Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, Vol. 42, No. 1: 201-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2003.411.201-220.
Amin, K. (2009). Menguji Kembali Keakuratan Metodologi Kritik Hadis. Jakarta: Penerbit Hikmah.
Burton, J. (2001). An Introduction to The Hadith. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
Cripps, T. (1995) “Historical Truth: An Interview with Ken Burns”. American Historical Review. The American Historical Review, Vol. 100, No. 3. https://doi.org/10.2307/2168603
Cook, M. (2003). Early Muslim Dogma; A Source-critical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cook, M. (1997) “The Opponents of The Writing of Tradition in Early Islam”, in Journal Arabica, Vol. 44, No. 4. 437-530. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4057289.
Donner, F. M. (2018). “Talking about Islamic Origins”, in Bulletin of SOAS, University of London. 1-23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X17001409
Ghurab, A. A. H. (1992). Menyingkap Tabir Orientalisme, terj, A. M. Basalamah. Jakarta: Pustaka Kautsar.
Goldziher, I. (1971). Muslim Studies, vol. 2. London: George Allen & UNWIN LTD.
Idri. (2017). Hadis dan Orientalis; Perspektif Ulama Hadis dan Para Orientalis tentang Hadis Nabi. Jakarta: Kencana.
Interview with Sarah Mirza via Email on Desember 09-11, 2020.
Juynboll, G. H. A. (2007). Encyclopedia of Canonical Hadith. Leiden: Brill.
Maizudin. (2016). “Analisis Isnad Cum Matn: Mengukur Kritik Hadis Muslim dan Barat”, dalam Jurnal Substanta, Vol. 18, No. 2. 233-246. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/substantia.v18i2.3009
Masrur, A. (2016). “Penerapan Metode Tradition-Historical Dalam Muṣannaf ‘Abd Al-Razzāq Al-Ṣan‘Ānī Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Persoalan Dating Hadis Dan Perkembangan Fikih Mekkah”. Jurnal Theologia, 24, No. 1, 175-200. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21580/teo.2013.24.1.320
Motzky, H. (2002). The Origins of Islamic Jurisprudence Meccan Fiqh Before the Classical Islam. Leiden: Brill.
Motzky, H. “The Mushannāf of ar-Razzaq as-San’ani; a source of Authentic Ahadith of the First Century”, in Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 50, No. 1.
Mirza, S. Z. (2016). “The Peoples’ Hadith: Evidence for Popular Tradition on Hadith as Physical Object in the First Centuries of Islam”. In Journal Arabica, vol. 63, 30-63. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24811836.
Mirza, S. Z. “Dhimma Agreements and Sanctuary System at Islamic Origins”, in Journal of Near Eastern Studies. 99-111. DOI: 10.1086/696536
Rahawan, M. S. M. al-. (2018). “Dating Hadith Textual Transposition by Means of Sanad-cum-matn Analysis”. Jurnal Al-Bayan: Journal of Qur'an and Hadith Studies, 16, No. 2, 91–113. https://doi.org/10.1163/22321969-12340061
S.A, Aghaei, (2006). “Dating Hadith Based on Document Analysis a Critical Review of Juynboll's Methodology”. Journal: Ulumul Hadith, 11, Number 3, 145-168. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=115713
Schacht, J. (1967). The Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
Supian, A. (2016). “Studi Hadis di kalangan Orientalisme”, dalam Jurnal Nuansa, Vol. IX, No. 1. 25-34. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/nuansa.v9i1.370
DOI: 10.21043/riwayah.v8i1.11572
How To Cite This :
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.