Banking Market Risk Modelling Using QAR-Based CoVaR with Quantile Regression
Abstract
Financial sector stability is essential for economic resilience, particularly in Indonesia’s banking industry. Commonly used risk measures such as Value-at-Risk (VaR) capture individual risk but do not adequately account for systemic interdependence. Existing studies often rely on linear models that are less capable of capturing asymmetric and heavy-tailed return behaviour. This study addresses this gap by developing a Conditional Value-at-Risk (CoVaR) framework based on the Quantile Autoregressive (QAR) approach. This study uses daily closing prices of 15 largest market-cap banking firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from July 4, 2022, to June 30, 2025. VaR is estimated using QAR, followed by CoVaR estimation through quantile regression, and evaluated using the Kupiec Proportion of Failures (POF) test. The results show that the QAR-based VaR model performs consistently well, with all 15 banks passing the Kupiec test at both the 1% and 5% quantiles, indicating robust tail risk estimation. In contrast, CoVaR results are less stable, with 14 banks passing at the 1% quantile and only 7 at the 5% quantile, suggesting challenges in capturing conditional dependence. Banks such as ARTO and BBHI exhibit stronger systemic spillover effects. This study contributes by integrating QAR into CoVaR modelling and provides insights for systemic risk monitoring in emerging banking markets.
Stabilitas sektor keuangan sangat penting dalam menjaga ketahanan ekonomi, khususnya pada industri perbankan di Indonesia. Ukuran risiko yang umum digunakan seperti Value-at-Risk (VaR) mampu menangkap risiko individual, namun belum memadai dalam merepresentasikan keterkaitan sistemik antar institusi. Studi yang ada umumnya masih mengandalkan model linier yang kurang mampu menangkap karakteristik return yang asimetris dan berekor tebal. Penelitian ini mengatasi kesenjangan tersebut dengan mengembangkan kerangka Conditional Value-at-Risk (CoVaR) berbasis pendekatan Quantile Autoregressive (QAR). Penelitian ini menggunakan data harga penutupan harian dari 15 perusahaan perbankan dengan kapitalisasi pasar terbesar yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia selama periode 4 Juli 2022 hingga 30 Juni 2025. Estimasi VaR dilakukan menggunakan model QAR, kemudian dilanjutkan dengan estimasi CoVaR melalui regresi kuantil, dengan evaluasi kinerja model menggunakan uji Kupiec Proportion of Failures (POF). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model VaR berbasis QAR memiliki kinerja yang konsisten baik, dengan seluruh 15 bank lolos uji Kupiec pada kuantil 1% dan 5%, yang mengindikasikan estimasi risiko ekor yang andal. Sebaliknya, hasil CoVaR menunjukkan stabilitas yang lebih rendah, dengan 14 bank lolos pada kuantil 1% dan hanya 7 bank pada kuantil 5%, yang mengindikasikan adanya tantangan dalam menangkap ketergantungan kondisional. Bank seperti ARTO dan BBHI menunjukkan kontribusi risiko sistemik yang lebih tinggi. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi dengan mengintegrasikan QAR ke dalam pemodelan CoVaR serta memberikan implikasi praktis bagi pemantauan risiko sistemik pada pasar perbankan di negara berkembang.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Acharya, V. V., Pedersen, L. H., Philippon, T., & Richardson, M. (2017). Measuring Systemic Risk. Review of Financial Studies, 30(1), 2–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhw088
Adrian, T., & Brunnermeier, M. K. (2016). CoVaR. American Economic Review, 106(7), 1705–1741. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20120555
Alimuddin, A. H., Dwi Prastyo, D., & Fithriasari, K. (2025). Hybrid LASSO-Quantile Regression and Support Vector Regression for Estimating Conditional Value-at-Risk of Banking Stock Returns in Indonesia. 2025 International Conference on Data Science and Its Applications (ICoDSA), 1148–1153. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoDSA67155.2025.11156987
Allen, F., Babus, A., & Carletti, E. (2012). Asset commonality, debt maturity and systemic risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 104(3), 519–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.07.003
Aqsari, H. W., Prastyo, D. D., & Akbar, M. S. (2026). Performance Comparison of Individual Risk Model Using VaR-POT with Its Risk Dependence Model Using Quantile Regression-Based CoVaR (pp. 129–144). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-7749-8_9
Brunnermeier, M. K. (2009). Deciphering the Liquidity and Credit Crunch 2007–2008. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.23.1.77
Dzhamtyrova, R., & Maple, C. (2022). Dynamic cyber risk estimation with competitive quantile autoregression. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 36(2), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-021-00814-z
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486
Handayani, L. P. S., & Prastyo, D. D. (2020). Analisis Likuiditas Saham Sektor Perbankan di BEI Menggunakan Analisis Intervensi dan Autoregressive Conditional Duration. INFERENSI, 3(1), 47–54.
Kholishoh, L. N., Anwar, C. J., & Suhendra, I. (2024). Bank Systemic Risk in Indonesia. Journal of Economics, Finance And Management Studies, 07(06). https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i6-17
Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression Quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913643
Koenker, R., & Xiao, Z. (2006). Quantile Autoregression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101(475), 980–990. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214506000000672
Kupiec, P. H. (1995). Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Measurement Models. The Journal of Derivatives, 3(2), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.1995.407942
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/2975974
Mishkin, F. S. . (2007). The economics of money, banking, and financial markets. In Policy. Pearson.
Muharam, H., & Erwin, E. (2017). Measuring Systemic Risk of Banking in Indonesia: Conditional Value at Risk Model Application. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 6(2), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjie.v6i2.5296
Prastyo, D. D., Sudjati, I. L., Fam, S.-F., Setiawan, Suhartono, & Satyaning Pradnya Paramitaa, N. L. P. (2018). Value-at-Risk Modeling on Stock Return with Exogenous Variables using ARMAX-GARCHX Approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028, 012225. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012225
Prastyo, D. D., Yuniarti, I., Setiawan, & Rahayu, S. P. (2025). Interval Forecasting Using GEV Regression With Stochastic Search Variable Selection: A Simulation Study and Its Application to Forecast Imported Meat Price Range. IEEE Access, 13, 113013–113027. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3579702
Syalsabila, A., Prastyo, D. D., Akbar, M. S., Rahayu, S. P., & Deivanayagampillai, N. (2024). Conditional Value-At-Risk Modelling Using Hybrid LASSO-QRNN to Quantify the Market Risk Dependence on Oil and Gas Companies’ Stock in Indonesia (pp. 227–240). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-80338-3_22
Wijoyo, N. A., Adiningsih, S., Ekaputra, I. A., & Wibowo, B. (2022). Identifying Systemically Important Banks in Indonesia: CoVaR Approach. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 49(2), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.49.2.8
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/jpmk.v9i1.35180
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Editorial and Administration Office:
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (Kudus)
Tadris Matematika, Tarbiyah Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kudus
Jl. Conge Ngembalrejo Po Box 51, Kudus, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia, Kode Pos: 59322
Email: [email protected]
















