The Descriptions of TPACK Oriented Mathematics Learning for Elementary Students
Abstract
The teachers’ online teaching competencies play a crucial role in the COVID-19 era, as those who are unprepared to use technology in the classroom experienced difficulties in designing and conducting the class. This research aims to describe the implementation of mathematics learning that is oriented, pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of elementary school teachers. The research was conducted in the city of Bukittinggi, involving 6 elementary schools, 6 teachers, and 12 students. This research is a qualitative descriptive study. The research method is in the form of a survey. Data collection techniques used are literature studies, interviews, and questionnaires. The data obtained were analyzed using descriptive analysis. The results of this research indicated that teachers have implemented TPACK approach which includes the planning, implementations and assessment processes. The teacher has implemented the TPACK-based learning process in learning mathematics. The learning process is structured by combining technological tools during the planning, implementation, and assessment processes. Teachers equip students with technology-based learning resources and teaching materials. During TPACK teachers were facilitated to access information for teaching references. The use of technology gives a positive impact on learning and creates an enjoyable learning experience for the students. This research also encourages further research that can improve the quality of TPACK-based digital learning implementation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Almoeather, R. (2020). Effectiveness of Blackboard and Edmodo in Self-Regulated Learning and Educational Satisfaction. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(2), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-60984-5.00062-7.
Baier, F., & Kunter, M. (2020). Construction and validation of a test to assess (pre-service) teachers' technological pedagogical knowledge (TPK). Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67, 100936.
Brinkley-Etzkorn, K. E. (2018). Learning to teach online: Measuring the influence of faculty development training on teaching effectiveness through a TPACK lens. The Internet and Higher Education, 38, 28-35.
Buzzetto-More, N. (2015). Student Attitudes Towards The Integration Of YouTube In Online, Hybrid, And Web-Assisted Courses: An Examination Of The Impact Of Course Modality On Perception. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 55–73.
Darma, I. K., Karma, I. G. M., & Santiana, I. M. A. (2020). Blended Learning, Inovasi Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 Bagi Pendidikan Tinggi. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika (Vol. 3, pp. 527-539).
Gecer, A., & Dag, F. (2012). Blended Learning Experiences. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 438–442.
Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Action: A Descriptive Study of Secondary Teachers’ Curriculum-Based, Technology-Related Instructional Planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211–229.
Helsa, Y., & Kenedi, A. K. (2019). Edmodo-Based Blended Learning Media in Learning Mathematics. Journal of Teaching and Learning in Elementary Education, 2(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33578/jtlee.v2i2.7416
Hockly, N. (2018). Blended Learning. ELT Journal, 72(1), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx058
Hrastinski, S. (2019). What Do We Mean by Blended Learning? TechTrends, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge? Contemporary Issue in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Akcaoglu, M., & Rosenberg, J. M. (2013). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework for teachers and teacher educators. ICT integrated teacher education: A resource book, 2-7.
Maziriri, E. T., Gapa, P., & Chuchu, T. (2020). Student Perceptions Towards the Use of Youtube as an Educational Tool for Learning and Tutorials. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1329a.
Mulenga, E. M., & Marbán, J. M. (2020). Prospective teachers’ online learning mathematics activities in the age of COVID-19: A cluster analysis approach. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(9), em1872.
Perienen, A. (2020). Frameworks for ICT integration in mathematics education-A teacher’s perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(6), em1845.
Rosyid, A. (2016). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: sebuah kerangka pengetahuan bagi guru Indonesia di era MEA. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Inovasi Pendidikan (pp. 446-454).
Nur, A. S., Fitrianti, H., Sianturi, M., & Irianto, M. S. Q. (2018). HOTS Test Construction Based on Orientation to The 2013 Curriculum Assessment Standards. 1st International Conference on Social Sciences (ICSS), 226, 1337–1342.
Powell, A., & Patrick, S. (2006). An International Perspective of K-12 Online Learning: A Summary of the 2006 NACOL International E-Learning Survey. North American Council for Online Learning, 1–28.
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge ( TPACK ): The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.
Shamir-Inbal, T., & Blau, I. (2016). Developing Digital Wisdom by Students and Teachers: The Impact of Integrating Tablet Computers on Learning and Pedagogy in an Elementary School. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 0(0), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116649375
Shu, H., & Gu, X. (2018). Determining the differences between online and face-to-face student–group interactions in a blended learning course. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.05.003
Srinivasacharlu, A. (2020). Using Youtube in Colleges of Education. International Journal of Education, 8(2), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i2.1736
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Roblin, N. P., Tondeur, J., & Braak, J. Van. (2012). Technological pedagogical content knowledge – a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
Wijanarko, A. G., & Ganeswara, M. (2021). The Influence of Flipped Classroom Towards Student’s Motivation and Learning Outcome in Mathematics: A Case of Students in SD Hj Isriati Baiturrahman 1 Semarang. ELEMENTARY: Islamic Teacher Journal, 9(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.21043/elementary.v9i1.10880
Willermark, S. (2017). Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge: A Review of Empirical Studies Published From 2011 to 2016. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 0(0), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117713114
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/elementary.v10i1.11746
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
indexed by:
