Kepuasan Pembelajaran Secara Online: Apakah Gaya Belajar Mempunyai Pengaruh?

M Nur Ghufron

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan menguji pengaruh gaya belajar tergantung dan gaya belajar bebas mahasiswa terhadap kepuasan pembelajaran secara online. Penelitian secara kuantitatif ini melibatkan 69 mahasiswa yang melaksanakan pembelajaran secara online. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kuesioner dalam bentuk skala. Ada tiga jenis skala yang digunakan dalam proses pengumpulan data, yaitu skala kepuasan pembelajaran secara online, gaya belajar tergantung dan gaya belajar bebas. Tehnik analisis data dengan menggunakan tehnik analisis regresi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa,  gaya belajar bebas berpengaruh secara positif terhadap kepuasan pembelajaran secara online sebesar 0.446, p=0.000. Sementara gaya belajar tergantung berpengaruh secara negatif terhadap kepuasan pembelajarn secara online sebesar -0.647, p=0.000. Koefesien determinasi kepuasan pembelajaran secara online sebesar  (R²) = 0.496, yang bermakna bahwa 49 persen kepuasan pembelajaran secara online dapat dijelaskan atau diprediksi melalui variabel  gaya belajar, baik gaya belajar bebas maupun gaya belajar tergantung.

This study aims to examine the effect of field-dependent learning styles and field independent learning styles of students on online learning satisfaction. This quantitative research involved 69 students who conducted online learning. Data collection techniques used in this study were questionnaires in the form of scales. There are three types of scales used in the data collection process, namely online learning satisfaction scales, field-dependent learning styles, and field independent learning styles. Data analysis techniques using regression analysis techniques. The results showed that the field independent learning style had a positive effect on online learning satisfaction by 0.446, p = 0.000. While field-dependent learning style negatively affected online learning satisfaction of -0,647, p = 0,000. The coefficient of determination of online learning satisfaction is (R²) = 0.496, which means that 49 percent of online learning satisfaction can be explained or predicted through learning style variables, both field independent learning styles, and field-dependent learning styles.


Keywords


Kepuasan, Pembelajaran Online, Gaya Belajar

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akdemir, O. & Koszalka, T.A. (2008). Investigating the relationships among instructional strategies and learning styles in online environments. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1451-1461. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved May 29, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/67213/.

Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N., & Mabry, E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A metaanalysis. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 83-97.

Arbaugh, J. B. (2004). Learning to Learn Online: A study of perceptual changes between multiple online course experiences. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(3), 169-182.

Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Battalio, J. (2007). Interaction online: A reevaluation. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(4), 339-352.

Bean, J. P., & Bradley, R. K. (1986). Untangling the satisfaction-performance relationship for college students. Journal of Higher Education, 57(4), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.2307/1980994

Biner, P. M., Bink, M. L., Huffman, M. L., & Dean, R. S. (1997). The impact of remote-site group size on student satisfaction and relative performance in interactive telecourses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(1).

Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2012). Student perceptions of satisfaction and anxiety in an online doctoral program. Distance Education, 33(1), 81–98. doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.667961

Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2018). Online student perceptions of engagement, transactional distance, and outcomes. Distance Education, 39(3), 299–316. doi.org/10.1080/01587919. 2018.1476845

Bostrom, R.P., Olfman, L. and Sein, M.K. (1990), The importance of learning style in end-user training, MIS Quarterly, 14 (1).

Cheng, F.-F., Chiu, C.-C., Wu, C.-S. & Tsaih, D.-C. (2017). The influence of learning style on satisfaction and learning effectiveness in the asynchronous web-based learning system. Library Hi Tech, 35 (4), 473-489. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-12-2016-0151

Chou, H.-W. & Wang, T.-B. (2000), The influence of learning style and training method on self-efficacy and learning performance in WWW homepage design training. International Journal of Information Management, 20 (6), 455-472.

Clariana, R. B. & Smith, L., (1988). Learning Style Shifts in Computer-assisted Instructional Settings. London: C. V. Mosby Company.

Dennen, V. P., Aubteen Darabi, A., & Smith, L. J. (2007). Instructor–Learner Interaction in Online Courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance Education, 28(1), 65–79. doi:10.1080/01587910701305319

Diwan, P. (2017). Is Education 4.0 an imperative for success of 4th Industrial Revolution? Accessed from https://medium.com/@pdiwan/is-education-4-0-an-im-perative-for-success-of-4th-industrial-revolu-tion-50c31451e8a4

Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1). doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5

Flowers, C., Jordan, L., Algozzine, B., Spooner, F., & Fisher, A. (2001). Compari-son of student rating of instruction in distance education and traditional courses. Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher EducationInternational Conference, 1,2314–2319.

Ghufron, M., N & Risnawita, R. (2013). Review of Learning Styles on Student with Self-Regulated Learning. Anima, Indonesian Psychological Journal, 29(1).

Ghufron, M., N. (2020). Epistemological Beliefs and Mediating Role of Learning Approaches on Social Attitudes of SHS Students. Universal Journal of Educational Research 8(1), 202-211, 2020. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080125

Ghufron, M.N. & Risnawita, R., (2012) Gaya Belajar; Kajian Teoretik. Yogyakarta; Pustaka Pelajar

Graf, S., Liu, T.C. & Kinshuk. (2010). Analysis of Learners' Navigational Behaviour and Their Learning Styles in an Online Course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(2), 116-131. Wiley. Retrieved May 8, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/108289/.

Gunawan, W. A. (2006). Genius Learning Strategy. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.

Gunawardena, C. & Boverie, P. (1993), Impact of learning styles on instructional design for distance education. World Conference of the International Council of Distance Education, Bangkok, November 8-13.

Johnson, S. D., Aragon, S. R., Shaik, N., & Palma-Rivas, N. (2000). Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(1), 29-49.

Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 386-434). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kelsey, K. D., Lindner, J. R., & Dooley, K. E. (2002). Agricultural education at a distance: Let’s hear from the students. Journal of Agricultural Education, 43(4).

Kitchen, D. & McDougall, D.(1998). Collaborative Learning on the Internet. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 27(3), 245.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as The Source of Learning and Development. New Jersey : Prentice-Hall.

Kolb, D.A. (2014), Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, FT press, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Liaw, S.-S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864–873. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.

Luk, S. (1998). The relationship between cognitive style and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29, 137-147.

McGivney, V. (2004). Understanding persistence in adult learning. Open Learning, 19(1).

Merriam, S. B., & Caffarella, R. S. (1991). Learning in Adulthood. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Montgomery, S.,M. & Groat L., N. (1998) Student Learning Styles and their implications for teaching. CRLT Occasional Paper No 10. Michigan: The Center for Research on Learning and Teaching The University of Michigan.

Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What’s the Difference? A Review of Contemporary Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Learning in Higher Education. Washington DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.

Pike, G. R. (1993). The relationship between perceived learning and satisfaction with college: An alternative view. Research in Higher Education, 34(1).

Reinhart, J. & Schneider, P. (2001). Student Satisfaction, Self-Efficacy, and the Perception of the Two-Way Audio/Video Distance Learning Environment: A Preliminary Examination. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2(4), 357. Retrieved May 9, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/92806/.

Riding, R. & Rainer, S. (2002). Cognitive Style & Learning strategies understanding style differences in learning and behaviour. London: David Fulton Publishers.

Sahin, I., & Shelley, M. (2008). Considering students’ perceptions: The distance education student satisfaction model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(3).

Sein, M.K. & Robey, D. (1991), Learning style and the efficacy of computer training methods, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72 (1), pp.

Shelton, B. E., Hung, J. L., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2017). Predicting student success by modeling student interaction in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 38(1). doi.org/10. 1080/01587919.2017.1299562

Stokes, S. P. (2003). Temperament, learning styles, and demographic predictors of college student satisfaction in a digital learning environment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Biloxi, MS. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED482454.pdf

Susilo, M. J. (2006). Gaya Belajar Menjadikan Makin Pintar. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pinus.

Wang, K.H., Wang, T.H., Wang, W.L. and Huang, S.C. (2006). Learning styles and formative assessment strategy: enhancing student achievement in web-based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), pp.

Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2018). Technology Matters – The Impact of Transactional Distance on Satisfaction in Online Distance Learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3417

Wickersham, L. E., & McGee, P. (2008). Perceptions of satisfaction and deeper learning in an online course. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9.

Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). The effect of training and of structural aids on performance in three tests of space orientation. (Report No. 80). Washington, D.C.: Civil Aeronautics Administration, Division of Research.

Wyatt, G. (2005). Satisfaction, academic rigor and interaction: Perceptions of online instruction. Education, 125(3).

Yang, D., Baldwin, S., & Snelson, C. (2017). Persistence factors revealed: Students’ reflections on completing a fully online program. Distance Education, 38(1). doi.org/10.1080/ 01587919.2017.1299561




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/quality.v8i1.7508

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 QUALITY

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License


Quality Journal by Pascasarjana IAIN Kudus is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.