Kompleksitas Penyelenggaraan Layanan Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini (PAUD) dalam Perspektif Standar Nasional PAUD
Abstract
The Complexity of Early Childhood Education (PAUD) Service Delivery in the Perspective of the National PAUD Standards. This study aims to explore the challenges and actions taken in implementing PAUD services in accordance with national standards at PAUD Waluyo Jati Gumelem Kulon, Susukan District, Banjarnegara Regency. The language is objective, formal, and unbiased. The text is free from grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. It is case study research that utilized interviews, observations, and documentation as data collection methods. The Miles and Huberman model data analysis technique was employed, including data reduction, data display, and verification stages. Abbreviations and technical terms are clearly defined upon initial use. The outcomes indicated that PAUD Waluyo Jati encountered issues in all standards during service implementation. STPPA experienced difficulties utilizing tools to evaluate the growth and development of young children. Compiling a curriculum that takes into account institutional peculiarities presented challenges in the content standard. In terms of the process standard, obstacles arose in preparing RPPM and RPPH. In the assessment standard, issues have arisen regarding the execution of assessments that do not align with the assessment tool. In the education personnel standard, difficulties stem from the compliance with academic qualifications required of teachers. In the facilities and infrastructure standard, limitations are observed in terms of available restrooms and workspace. Financial standards present challenges in raising funds to provide PAUD services, while management practices at PAUD Waluyo Jati suffer from inadequate documentation of program implementation. In light of these difficulties, PAUD Waluyo Jati should strive for continuous improvement in meeting national PAUD standards by preparing activity programmes that comply with these standards.
Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan kesulitan dan upaya yang dihadapi pada penyelenggaraan layanan PAUD dalam perspektif standar nasional PAUD di PAUD Waluyo Jati Gumelem Kulon Kecamatan Susukan Kabupaten Banjarnegara. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian studi kasus. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara, observasi dan dokumentasi. Kemudian dianalisis menggunakan teknik analisis data model Miles dan Huberman yang terdiri dari tahap reduksi data, display data dan verifikasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa pada penyelenggaraan layanan PAUD Waluyo Jati mengalami kesulitan dalam setiap standarnya.Pada STPPA ditemukan kesulitan dalam hal penggunaan instrumen untuk melakukan assesment terhadap tumbuh-kembang anak usia dini. Pada standar isi ditemukan kesulitan dalam menyusun kurikulum yang sesuai dengan kekhasan lembaga. Pada standar proses ditemukan kesulitan dalam penyusunan RPPM dan RPPH. Pada standar penilaian ditemui kesulitan terkait dengan pelaksanaan penilaian yang belum sesuai dengan instrumen penilaian. Pada standar pendidik dan tenaga kependidikan ditemui kesulitan terkait dengan pemenuhan kualifikasi akademik guru. Pada standar sarana dan prasarana ditemui kesulitan berupa keterbatasan toilet dan ruang kerja. Pada standar pembiayaan ditemui kesulitan dalam hal penggalangan dana untuk pembiayaan penyelenggaraan layanan PAUD. Pada standar pengelolaan ditemui kesulitan pihak guru PAUD Waluyo Jati belum mampu mendokumentasikan setiap pelaksanaan program dengan baik.Berdasarkan kesulitan-kesulitan di atas maka sebaiknya PAUD Waluyo Jati melakukan upaya perbaikan secara berkelanjutan dalam pemenuhan standar nasional PAUD dengan menyusun program kegiatan PAUD yang sesuai dengan standar nasional PAUD.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alamsyah, M., Ahmad, S., & Harris, H. (2020). Pengaruh Kualifikasi Akademik dan Pengalaman Mengajar terhadap Profesionalisme Guru. Journal of Education Research, 1(3), 1830187. https://doi.org/10.37985/joe.v1i3.19
Alwi, H., dkk. (2002). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Balai Pustaka.
Asiah, S. N. (2018). Analisis Manajemen PAUD Berbasis Standar Akreditasi PAUD dan PNF di Kutai Kartanegara. Syamil: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam (Journal of Islamic Education), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21093/sy.v6i1.1325
Berlinski, S., & Galiani, S. (2007). The effect of a large expansion of pre-primary school facilities on preschool attendance and maternal employment. Labour Economics, 14(3), 665–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2007.01.003
Byrne, D., & Callaghan, G. (2013). Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203519585
Cooklin, A. R., Giallo, R., & Rose, N. (2012). Parental fatigue and parenting practices during early childhood: An Australian community survey: Parental fatigue during early parenting. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38(5), 654–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01333.x
Fadlillah, M. (2016). Komparasi Permendikbud Nomor 137 Tahun 2014 dengan Permendiknas Nomor 58 Tahun 2009 dalam Pembelajaran PAUD. JURNAL INDRIA (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Prasekolah Dan Sekolah Awal), 1(1).
Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 798–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.009
Hermes, P., Mulder, M., van Paassen, M. M., Boering, J. H. L., & Huisman, H. (2009). Solution-Space-Based Complexity Analysis of the Difficulty of Aircraft Merging Tasks. Journal of Aircraft, 46(6), 1995–2015. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.42886
Hidayat, R., & Candra, W. (2017). Ayat-Ayat Alquran Tentang Manajemen Pendidikan Islam. LPPPI.
Hirst, P. H. (2010). Knowledge and the Curriculum (International Library of the Philosophy of Education Volume 12) (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861127
Hopkins, D. (2015). Improving the Quality of Education for All (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315068756
Jensen, A., & Aven, T. (2018). A new definition of complexity in a risk analysis setting. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 171, 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.11.018
Jess, M., Atencio, M., & Thorburn, M. (2011). Complexity theory: Supporting curriculum and pedagogy developments in Scottish physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 16(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2011.540424
Kamelia, N. (2019). Perkembangan Fisik Motorik Anak Usia Dini (Standar Tingkat Pencapaian Perkembangan Anak) di RA Harapan Bangsa Maguwoharjo Condong Catur Yogyakarta. Kindergarten: Journal of Islamic Early Childhood Education, 2(2), 112. https://doi.org/10.24014/kjiece.v2i2.9064
Lam, S., Lee, V., Ooi, K., & Phusavat, K. (2012). A structural equation model of TQM, market orientation and service quality. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 22(3), 281–309. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604521211230996
Menix, K. D. (2007). Evaluation of Learning and Program Effectiveness. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 38(5), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20070901-05
Milles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Method Source Book (3rd ed.). Sage.
Moleong, L. J. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Rosda.
Morrison, K. (2012). School Leadership and Complexity Theory (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203603512
Mulyasana, D. (2015). Pendidikan Bermutu dan Berdaya Saing. Rosda.
Mun, K., Mun, J., Hwang, Y., & Kim, S.-W. (2017). Changes in High School Students’ Creative Leader Competency through STEAM R&E. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 37(5), 825–833. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2017.37.5.825
Noaman, A. Y., Ragab, A. H. M., Madbouly, A. I., Khedra, A. M., & Fayoumi, A. G. (2017). Higher education quality assessment model: Towards achieving educational quality standard. Studies in Higher Education, 42(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1034262
Ramawati, Y. (2016). Analisis Kesesuaian Standar Pelayanan tempa penitipan Anak (TPA) Yayasan Buah Hati Sidoarjo dengan Standar Nasional. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi dan Sosial, 7(2), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.35724/jies.v7i2.505
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
Sallis, E. (2014). Total Quality Management in Education (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203417010
Sulaeman, D. (2021). Manajemen Satuan PAUD ditinjau dari Standar Pengelolaan dalam Peningkatan Mutu Kelembambagaan. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(1), 458–462. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v5i1.1112
Susanti, S., Fitria, H., & Puspita, Y. (2020). Pengaruh Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kinerja Guru Terhadap Nilai Siswa. Journal of Education Research, 1(2), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.37985/joe.v1i2.13
Wildemuth, B., Freund, L., & G. Toms, E. (2014). Untangling search task complexity and difficulty in the context of interactive information retrieval studies. Journal of Documentation, 70(6), 1118–1140. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2014-0056
Wiyani, N. A. (2020). Menciptakan Layanan PAUD yang Prima Melalui Penerapan Praktik Activity Based Costing. Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga Dan Konsumen, 13(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.24156/jikk.2020.13.2.175
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/quality.v11i2.14207
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 QUALITY
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Quality Journal by Pascasarjana IAIN Kudus is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.