Open Journal Systems
Arab Saudi dan Iran: Kontestasi Ideologi dan Dampaknya di Kawasan Timur Tengah Pasca The Arab Spring
Abstract
Saudi Arabia and Iran: Ideological Contest and Its Impact in the Middle East Region after The Arab Spring. Tensions surround the Middle East region, especially between Saudi Arabia and Iran. The Sunni-Shia ideological factor contributed to the conflict in the region and also attracted these two countries. This research will answer the question how is the form of contestation of Sunni-Shia ideology represented by Saudi Arabia with Iran in the Middle East? What are the factors and impacts of the conflict between Saudi Arabia and Iran on countries in the region after the Arab Spring? The historical approach (historical analysis) was chosen to explain the two research questions above, using qualitative methods. Saudi Arabia and Iran represent both a Sunni-Shia ideological contestation, both of which try to support each other's ruling government, as well as conflicting oppositions based on ideological backgrounds. This support is carried out in the form of military assistance, weapons, or direct involvement which is marked by various statements that appear in the media. The disharmony of Saudi Arabia and Iran is driven by several factors, namely first, the Sunni-Shia ideological struggle between the two. Second, the claim to be the holder of the Islamic religion in each version. And third, oil. While the impact of this is political instability in the Middle East region after the Arab Spring, to the "cold war" involving Saudi Arabia and Iran.
.
Keywords
References
Al-Ha’labi, S. (2004). Ta’ifah al-Nusairiyah Tarikuha wa Akadi’uha (2nd ed.). Kuwait: Ad-Dar As-Salafiyah.
Aldi, B. (2015). Akankah Arab Saudi dan Iran berperang? Retrieved from Kompasiana.com website: https://www.kompasiana.com/bob.aldi/55310e346ea83475578b4567/akankah-arab-saudi-dan-iran-berperang
Berlianto. (2015). Assad Akui Minta Bantuan Militer pada Rusia. Retrieved from Sindonews.com website: https://international.sindonews.com/berita/1049378/43/assad-akui-minta-bantuan-militer-pada-rusia
Enayat, H. (1982). Modern Islamic Political Thought. London.: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
Esposito, J. L. (1995). The Oxford Enciclopedia of the Modern Islamic World (Vol. 02). Oxford London: Oxford University Perss.
Hitti, P. K. (2006). History of The Arabs. (Jakarta: Serambi.
Kuncahyono, T. (2013). Tahrir Square, Jantung Revolusi Mesir. Jakarta: Kompas.
Lakza’i, A. N. (2010). Dinamika Pemikiran Politik Imam Khomeini. Jakarta: Shadra Press.
Mas’udi. (2015). AKAR-AKAR TEORI KONFLIK : Dialektika Konflik ; Core Perubahan Sosial dalam. Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah Dan Studi Keagamaan, 3(1), 177–200.
Mirror. (2015). World War Three could be just 30 SECONDS away as attacks on ISIS stepped up. Retrieved from Mirror website: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/world-war-three-could-just-6616199
Muhaimin. (2015). Memanas, Iran dan Saudi Saling Tuduh sebagai Biang Konflik. Retrieved from Sindonews.com website: https://international.sindonews.com/berita/1054663/43/memanas-iran-dan-saudi-saling-tuduh-sebagai-biang-konflik
Rafi’I, M. (2013). Islam Kita: Titik Temu Sunni-Syiah. Jakarta: Melistone Publisher.
Rahmaniah, A. (2018). Teori Konflik Ralf Dahrendorf. In The Anglo-American Tradition of Liberty. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315612430-3
Sahide, A. (2013). Ketegangan Politik Syiah-Sunni di Timur Tengah. Yogyakarta: The Phinisi Press.
Sihbudi, M. R. (1991). Bara Timur Tengah, Islam, Dunia Arab, Iran. Bandung: Penerbit Mizan.
Snyder, J. (2003). Dari Pemungutan Suara ke Pertumpahan Darah. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
Surbakti, R. (2010). Memahami Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Tamburaka, A. (2011). Revolusi Timur Tengah, Kejatuhan Para Penguasa Otoriterdi Negara-Negara Timur Tengah. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Narasi.
Tumengkol, S. M. (2012). Teori Sosiologi Suatu Perspektif Tentang Teori Konflik Dalam Masyarakat Industri. Manado.
DOI: 10.21043/politea.v4i1.10453
How To Cite This :
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Politea