Bujang: The Social Representation of Gen Z Masculinity in Bangka

Oktarizal Drianus, Diah Meitikasari, Rr. Rina Antasari, Shilpa Shetty Tri Syafitri, Siti Nuraisah

Abstract


Traditional images still dominate the representation of masculinity as a product of patriarchal ideology. This research examines the representation of masculinity among Generation Z in Bangka Island, exploring whether shifts occur or traditional norms persist. Using a social representation approach, the study investigated 178 Gen Z males through open questionnaires and interviews. They are called Bujang, which anchors for social representation of masculinity. Thematic analysis found that, in Gen Z’s perspective, masculinity focuses on Jadi Urang (being true men), and requires three dimensions: prosperity, sociability, and religiosity. Some norms of masculinity have changed, while others still adopt traditional masculinities in certain social configurations. In production relations, representation shows urang bujang ya begawi (men must work). In power relations, urang bujang belajer tanggungjawab (men have responsibility). In emotional relationships, kelaki jangen nanges (men don’t cry). These themes indicate both shifting and persistent elements of traditional masculinity norms.

Keywords


Bujang, Social Representation, Masculinity, Generation Z, Bangka Island

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Syukur, F., & Bagshaw, D. (2020). Gender, power, and court‐annexed mediation in Indonesia. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 37(4), 277–288.

Ailon, G. (2020). The phenomenology of homo economicus. Sociological Theory, 38(1), 36–50.

Anderson, E., & McGuire, R. (2010). Inclusive masculinity theory and the gendered politics of men’s rugby. Journal of Gender Studies, 19(3), 249–261.

Annisa, R., Idris, M., & Sholeh, K. (2021). Analisis Konsep Gender Dalam Undang-Undang Simbur Cahaya Sebagai Sumbe r Pembelajaran Sejarah. Penerbit Lakeisha.

Antasari, R. R., Nilawati, N., Adib, H. S., Sari, R. K., & Sobari, D. (2022). Gender Mainstreaming Problems in Student Organizations at Islamic Religious Colleges. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i2.1402

Armstrong, K. (2022). Sacred nature: How we can recover our bond with the natural world. Random House.

Banchs, M. A. (2014). Imaginaries, Representations and Social Memories. Papers on Social Representations, 23(2), 14–1.

Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford University Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. Taylor and Francis+NEJM. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Breskaya, O., & Giordan, G. (2018). Divided by religion, united by gender: A socio-religious interpretation of the” Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women”. 110–116.

Brown, K. E., Duriesmith, D., Rahman, F., & True, J. (2020). Conflicting Identities: The Nexus between Masculinities, Femininities and Violent Extremism in Asia. UNDP.

Chapman, R., & Rutherford, J. (2014). Male Order: Menguak Maskulinitas (F. Mayasari, Trans.). Jalasutra.

Charmaz, K., Harris, S. R., & Irvine, L. (2019). The social self and everyday life: Understanding the world through symbolic interactionism. John Wiley & Sons.

Connell, R. (2005). Masculinities (second edition). Polity.

Connell, R. (2016). Masculinities in global perspective: Hegemony, contestation, and changing structures of power. Theory and Society, 45(4), 303–318.

Connell, R. W. (2020). Masculinities (2nd edn). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003116479

Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859.

Cortés, P., & Pan, J. (2019). When time binds: Substitutes for household production, returns to working long hours, and the skilled gender wage gap. Journal of Labor Economics, 37(2), 351–398.

Diamat, J. (2019, April 1). The countries with the 10 largest Christian populations and the 10 largest Muslim populations. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/01/the-countries-with-the-10-largest-christian-populations-and-the-10-largest-muslim-populations/

Direktorat Statistik Kependudukan dan Ketenagakerjaan. (2020). Potret Sensus Penduduk 2020 Menuju Satu Data Kependudukan Indonesia. Badan Pusat Statistik RI.

Drianus, O., & Hayati, E. N. (2021). The Paradox of Masculinity: The Narrative Identities among the Elderly in Yogyakarta. JSW (Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo), 5(2), Article 2. https://journal.walisongo.ac.id/index.php/JSW/article/view/7848

Fakih, M. (1996). Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial. Pustaka Pelajar.

Fauzi, E. P. (2021). Konstruksi Sosial Soft Masculinity dalam Budaya Pop Korea. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 19(1), 127–144.

Fine, B. (2017). From one-dimensional man to one-dimensions economy and economics. Radical Philosophy Review, 20(1), 49–74.

Flick, U., & Foster, J. (2017). Social Representations. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology (pp. 195–214). Sage Publications.

Fromm, E., & Marx, K. (2013). Marx’s Concept of Man: Including ‘Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts’. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Fukuoka, M. (2015). A study of femininity and masculinity: Gender and sexsuality in Indonasian popular culture. Osaka Human Sciences, 1, 95–115.

Harvey, S., & Newcombe, S. (2021). Gender and Contemporary Millennial Movements. Open University.

Hasyim, N. (2021). Good Boys Doing Feminism: Maskulinitas dan Masa Depan Laki-Laki Baru. Buku Mojok.

Hayati, E. N., Emmelin, M., & Eriksson, M. (2014). “We no longer live in the old days”: A qualitative study on the role of masculinity and religion for men’s views on violence within marriage in rural Java, Indonesia. BMC Women’s Health, 14(1), 58.

Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and Time (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). State University of New York.

Hellman, A. (2021). Doing research in Indonesia and Sweden on the ambivalence of care and masculinity in ECEC; challenging dominant norms through ethnographic methodology. Ethnography and Education, 1–15.

Heywood, A. (2017). Political ideologies: An introduction (6th edn). Macmillan International Higher Education.

Hinduan, Z. R., Anggraeni, A., & Agia, M. I. (2020). Generation Z in Indonesia: The Self-Driven Digital. In The New Generation Z in Asia: Dynamics, Differences, Digitalisation. Emerald Publishing Limited.

Honneth, A. (2007). Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. Polity Press.

Ismail, N. H. (2019). The Indonesian Foreign Fighters, Hegemonic Masculinity and Globalisation [Thesis, Monash University]. https://doi.org/10.26180/5cf45a40827aa

Jung, C. G. (1970). Structure & Dynamics of the Psyche (G. Adler & R. F. C. Hull, Eds; Vol. 8). Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691097749/collected-works-of-cg-jung-volume-8

Jung, S. (2011). Korean Masculinities and Transcultural Consumption: Yonsama, Rain, Oldboy, K-Pop Idols. Hong Kong University Press.

Khoiriyah, N. (2020). A Long Road to a Gender Equality in the House of Representatives in Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences, 43–56.

Kodir, F. A. (2019). Qira’ah Mubadalah: Tafsir Progresif untuk Keadilan Gender dalam Islam. IRCiSoD.

Kusuma, S. N., & Sari, W. P. (2019). Gambaran Maskulinitas Melalui Film (Studi Pandangan Generasi Milenial Pada Tokoh Dilan di Film “Dilan 1990”). Koneksi, 2(2), 548–555.

Laskowski, N. G. (2020). Moral constraints on gender concepts. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 23(1), 39–51.

Leone, R. M., & Parrott, D. J. (2018). Hegemonic Masculinity and Aggression. In The Routledge International Handbook of Human Aggression (pp. 31–42). Routledge.

Marcuse, H. (2006). One-Dimensional Man (New Ed). Routledge. http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=6c7f022768db4b2986b52e450f27ac27

Martela, F., & Pessi, A. B. (2018). Significant Work Is About Self-Realization and Broader Purpose: Defining the Key Dimensions of Meaningful Work. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00363

McAllister, L., Callaghan, J. E., & Fellin, L. C. (2019). Masculinities and emotional expression in UK servicemen:‘Big boys don’t cry’? Journal of Gender Studies, 28(3), 257–270.

Moscovici, S. (1963). Attitudes and opinions. Annual Review of Psychology, 14(1), 231–260.

Moscovici, S. (1973). Foreword. In C. Herzlich (Ed.), Health and Illness: A Social Analysis (pp. ix–xiv). Academic Press.

Nilan, P. (2009). Contemporary Masculinities and Young Men in Indonesia. Indonesia and the Malay World, 37(109), 327–344.

Pappas, S. (2019). APA issues first-ever guidelines for practice with men and boys. Monitor on Psychology, 51(1), 34–39.

Permanadeli, R. (2015). Dadi Wong Wadon: Representasi Sosial Perempuan Jawa Di Era Modern. Pustaka Ifada.

Pew Research Center. (2015). The Future of World Religions: Population Growth Projections, 2010-2050 (Why Muslims Are Rising Fastest and the Unaffiliated Are Shrinking as a Share of the World’s Population). Pew Research Center.

Popping, R. (2015). Analyzing Open-ended Questions by Means of Text Analysis Procedures. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociolog Ique, 128(1), 23–39.

River, J., & Flood, M. (2021). Masculinities, emotions and men’s suicide. Sociology of Health & Illness, 43(4), 910–927.

Riyani, I. (2020). Islam, Women’s Sexuality and Patriarchy in Indonesia: Silent Desire. Routledge.

Rogers, W. S. (2011). Social Psychology (2nd edn). Open University Press & McGraw-Hill Education.

Sammut, G. E., Andreouli, E. E., Gaskell, G. E., & Valsiner, J. E. (2015). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge University Press.

Schroeder, J. (2017). 7 Reasons Why Millennial Men Are Reinventing Masculinity. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/julesschroeder/2017/10/12/the-evolved-man-7-reasons-why-millennial-men-are-reinventing-masculinity/

Senkans, S., McEwan, T. E., & Ogloff, J. R. (2020). Conceptualising intimate partner violence perpetrators’ cognition as aggressive relational schemas. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 55, 101456.

Shahriar, A. Z. M. (2018). Gender differences in entrepreneurial propensity: Evidence from matrilineal and patriarchal societies. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(6), 762–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.005

Srivastava, S. (2012). Masculinity and its role in gender-based violence in public spaces. In Fear that Stalks: Gender Based Violence in Public Spaces (pp. 13–50). Zubaan.

Urbina, D. A., & Ruiz-Villaverde, A. (2019). A Critical Review of Homo Economicus from Five Approaches. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 78(1), 63–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12258

Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Farr, R., Jovchelovitch, S., Lorenzi‐Cioldi, F., Marková, I., & Rose, D. (1999). Theory and method of social representations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 95–125.

Wahdiniwaty, R., & Rustam, D. (2019). Patriarchy as a Barrier to Women Entrepreneurs in Indonesia. 662(3), 032042.

Wahyuningtyas, V. N., & Agustiana, N. D. (2020). Resepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Maskulinitas Melalui Fashion Idol Kpop. Jurnal Komunikasi, Masyarakat Dan Keamanan, 2(1), 32–47.

Walby, S. (1991). Theorizing Patriarchy. Basil Blackwell Oxford.

Wayan, K. Y. I., & Nyoman, S. (2020). Women and Cultural Patriarchy in Politics. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(3), 2158–2164.

Wienke, C. (1998). Negotiating the male body: Men, masculinity, and cultural ideals. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 6(3), 255–282.

Wieringa, S. E. (2015). Gender harmony and the happy family: Islam, gender and sexuality in post-Reformasi Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 23(1), 27–44.

Wijaya, S., Widodo, S. T., & Subiyantoro, S. (2017). Diction and Moral Values in the Law of the Simbur Cahaya of Customary Cultural Law in the Society Period of Palembang Sultanate (Pragmatic S ociolinguistic Studies). 577–583.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/palastren.v18i2.23215

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 PALASTREN: Jurnal Studi Gender

Creative Commons License
Palastren : Jurnal Studi Gender by Pusat Studi Gender UIN Sunan Kudus is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.