Kebenaran di Era Post-Truth dan Dampaknya bagi Keilmuan Akidah
Abstract
This article discusses the phenomenon of the truth in this post-truth era which does not have a clear theoretical basis and prioritizes emotions and personal beliefs than the objective evidence. But the formation of truth is influentially shaping public opinion. As a result, people indifferently to the scientific truth or factual truth, including in matters of faith. The establish of the truth of faith in the post-truth era is being questioned. This article reveals the aspect of truth that appears in the media as the basis of belief (aqidah). We used the literature study method to determine the formation of truth in the post-truth era in the perspective of the philosophy of science. Specifically, this article will try to answer about how the impact of post-truth on creed scholarship, and how to reaffirm the truth in the post-truth era. The results of this study indicate that emotions and personal beliefs are the target points for alternative truth spreaders in the formation of post-truth. Post-truth can be used as a momentum to test the truth claims made by each religious group. An open truth test is important to do, so that the scientific faith can be an open text. The knowledge of faith will be placed in the context of today's society, so that it can blend with reality.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Affan, M., & Thohir, A. (2020). No TitleStudying Religion Through the Internet among Millennial Muslims: Causes and Consequences. Fikrah: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan, 8(1).
Arifin, N. F., & Fuad, A. J. (2020). Dampak Post-Truth di Media Sosial. Intelektual: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Keislaman, 10(3).
Ball, J. (2016). Post-Truth: How Bullshit Conquered the World. Ebury Press.
Bandarsyah, D. (2019). Fondasi Filosofis Pendidikan Sejarah di Era Post-truth. Historia: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah, 3(1).
Bruijn, B. De. (2016). Julia Kristeva’s ‘Culture of Revolt’ and (Post) Modern Religious Subjectivity. Department for the Study of Religion University of Toronto.
Gie, T. L. (2010). Pengantar Filsafat Ilmu. Liberty.
Gobber, G. (2019). The scarlet letter of “post-truth”: the sunset boulevard of communication. Church, Communication and Culture, 4(3), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2019.1665468
Jazila, S. (2020). Disruption Faces, Inequality, and Its Appearance in Religion: an Integrated Paradigm. Teosofia: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Mysticism, 9(2).
McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-Truth. MIT Press.
Miroshnichenko, A. (2017). The Post-truth World: How Social Media Destroy the Absolutism of the Objective Truth. human-as-media.com. https://human-as-media.com/2017/02/22/the-post-truth-world-howsocial-media-destroy-the-absolutism-of-the-objective-truth
Nichols, T. (2000). Matinya Kepakaran (R. M. P (penerj.)). Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
Sefriyono. (2020). Jihad Digital: Pembingkaian Narasi Kontra Radikalisasi NU Online di Dunia Maya. Fikrah: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan, 8(1).
Sim, S. (2019). Post-truth, Scepticism, and Power. Palgrave MacMillan.
Suriasumantri, J. S. (2000). Filsafat Ilmu, Sebuah PEngantar Populer. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Tesich, S. (1992). Government of Lies. Nation.
Ulya. (2018). Post-Truth, Hoax, dan Religiusitas di Media Sosial. Fikrah, Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan, 6(2).
Ummah, A. H. (2020). Digital Media and Counter-Narrative of Radicalism. Theologia, 31(2).
Wera, M. (2020). Meretas Makna Post-truth: Analisis Kontekstual Hoaks, Emosi Sosial, dan Populisme Agama. Societas Dei: Jurnal Agama dan Masyarakat, 7(1).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/fikrah.v9i2.12596
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 FIKRAH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
