Open Journal Systems

Aspek Keadilan Organisasi dan Deviant Workplace Behavior Karyawan

Aulia Puspita, Muhammad Zakiy

Abstract

This research aims at identifying the impact of distributive justice of compensation, interactional justice, and procedural justice toward employee’s deviant workplace behavior. This research was a quantitative descriptive research. The sample of the research were in total of 219 employees working at Sharia Financial Institution Yogyakarta. The sample were compiled using saturated sampling technique. The variable measuring scale used in the research was likert scale. The data analysis was done using IBM SPSS version 26 with the technique of multiple linear regression data analysis. The research results showed that distributive justice on compensation negatively impact on deviant workplace behavior, interactional justice has a negative impact on deviant workplace behavior, and procedural justice also has a negative impact on deviant workplace behavior. The unjust perspective experienced by employees will lead to resistance within the inner selves of the employees which consequently lead them to master up courage in performing some deviants against the organization.

Keywords

distributive justice of compensation; interactional justice; procedural justice; and deviant workplace behavior.

References

Afandi, P. (2016). Concept & Indicator Human Resource Management for Management Research. Deepublish.

Al-Quran Terjemahan. (2015). Departemen Agama RI. Bandung: CV Darus Sunnah.

Astri, Y., & Zahreni, S. (2017). Pengaruh Iklim Organisasi terhadap Perilaku Cyberloafing pada Karyawan PT X : Effect of Organization Climate on Cyberloafing Behavior in Employees of PT X. Jurnal Pemikiran & Penelitian Psikologi, 13(1), 16–26. https://talenta.usu.ac.id/jppp/article/view/2264

Basuki, A. T., & Prawoto, N. (2016). Analisis Regresi dalam Penelitian Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386

Di Stefano, G., Scrima, F., & Parry, E. (2019). The Effect of Organizational Culture on Deviant Behaviors in the Workplace. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(17), 2482–2503. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1326393

Faheem, M. A., & Mahmud, N. (2015). The effects of organizational justice on workplace deviance and job satisfaction of employees: Evidence from a public sector hospital of Pakistan. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 342–352. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5p342

Giacalone, R. A., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Antisocial Behaviors in Organizations. Sage Publication.

Ivancevich, J. M., Konopaske, R., & Matteson, M. T. (2007). Perilaku dan Manajemen Organisasi (07 ed.). Erlangga.

Kalemci, R. A., Kalemci-Tuzun, I., & Ozkan-Canbolat, E. (2019). Employee Deviant Behavior: Role of Culture and Organizational Relevant Support. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 28(2), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejmbe-11-2018-0125

Khattak, M. N., Khan, M. B., Fatima, T., & Shah, S. Z. A. (2019). The underlying mechanism between perceived organizational injustice and deviant workplace behaviors: Moderating role of personality traits. Asia Pacific Management Review, 24(3), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2018.05.001

Kidwell, R. E., & Martin, C. L. (2005). Managing Organizational Deviance. Sage Publication.

Kusumawati, Y., & Surya Putra, M. (2015). Pengaruh Keadilan Prosedural Dan Keadilan Interaksional Terhadap Perilaku Retaliasi Karyawan. E-Jurnal Manajemen Universitas Udayana, 4(3), 249386.

Manan, A. (2016). Hukum Ekonomi Syariah. Kencana.

Masyrafina, I. (2017, April 2). OJK: Kasus Penipuan Bank 90 Persen Dibantu Orang Dalam. Republika.Co.Id. https://www.republika.co.id/amp/onra3n382

Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and OCB. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527–556.

Rembeth, D. (2018, April 2). Tingkat Laporan Kejahatan Ekonomi Global Mencapai Rekor Tinggi; Kekhawatiran Soal Kejahatan Siber, Biaya, dan Pertanggungjawaban Meningkat. Pwc.Com. https://www.pwc.com/id/en/mediacentre/pressrelease/2018/indonesian/laporan-kejahatan-ekonomi-global.html

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2008). Perilaku Organisasi (12th ed.). Salemba Empat.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2018). Perilaku Organisasi (16th ed.). Salemba Empat.

Robinson, S. L., & Bennet, R. J. (1995). a Typology of Deviant Workplace Behaviors: a Multidimensional Scaling Study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555–572. https://doi.org/10.2307/256693

Rukajat, A. (2018). Pendekatan Penelitian Kuantitatif (01 ed.). Deepublish.

Shaheen, S., Bashir, S., & Khan, A. K. (2017). Examining Organizational Cronyism as an Antecedent of Workplace Deviance in Public Sector Organizations. Public Personnel Management, 46(3), 308–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026017716655

Sugiyono. (2017). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Alfabeta.

Survai Fraud Indonesia 2016. (2017). ACFE Indonesia Chapter.

Ulum, M. (2019, September 10). Dana Nasabah Rp30 Miliar BMT di Medan Diduga Dilarikan. Sumatra.Bisnis.Com. https://sumatra.bisnis.com/read/20190910/534/1146554/dana-nasabah-rp30-miliar-bmt-di-medan-diduga-dilarikan

Xu, D., Zhou, K. Z., & Du, F. (2019). Deviant versus Aspirational Risk Taking: The Effects of Performance Feedback on Bribery Expenditure and R&D Intensity. Academy of Management Journal, 62(4), 1226–1251.

Full Text: PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

DOI: 10.21043/equilibrium.v8i1.7295