DEVELOPMENT OF REGULATIONS ON FACTUAL ACTIONS POST-LAW ON GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION: 2024 ELECTION PROCESS DISPUTE STUDY IN CASU PRIMA POLITICAL PARTY

Ahmad Said, Ratna Herawati, Sulistiani -

Abstract


Factual actions in state administrative law have experienced developments after the issue of government administration law. This factual action is active in nature and is always preceded by a written decision from state administrative officials (TUN). However, in practice, factual actions involving written decisions are still subject to district courts accepting claims for unlawful acts (PMH) such as official decisions of state administrative officials (TUN) which are naturally the public law. This can be seen in the Jakarta District Court Decision Number: 757/Pdt.G/2022/PN which has punished the General Election Commission of the Republic of Indonesia (KPU RI) to postpone the General Election (Pemilu) and pay compensation. The aim of the research is to analyze the problems of the authority of written factual actions and to reformulate fair laws in the PTUN judicial system as well as the amount of awarded compensation procedures. Meanwhile, this research uses normative legal methods with statutory, conceptual and case approaches. The data collection method is by means of secondary data. The results of this research show that in the development of factual actions in state administrative law there has been an expansion of meaning to include written decisions, so that if there is a dispute over the election process between participants and the organizers of the General Election (Pemilu) then dispute resolution becomes the realm of absolute competence of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) after taking legal adjudication efforts at the Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu). For this reason, in the future, legal reformulation efforts are needed regarding the expansion of the meaning of written decisions to also include factual actions contained in Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning PTUN, and changes to Government Regulation Number 43 of 1991 in the nominal amount of compensation awarded in PTUN according to real conditions regarding factual actions that give rise to PMH by the government.


Keywords


TUN Decisions; Factual Actions; Election Process Disputes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrianto, B. O., Nugraha, X., & Grady, N. (2020). Perkembangan Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum oleh Pemerintah Pasca-Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014. Negara Hukum, 11(30), 43–62.

Amrizal J Prang, (2013). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Oleh Penguasa (Onrechtmatige OverheidsDaad), Jurnal Transformasi Administrasi 3, No. 2,Hal. 571. (n.d.).

Dessy Artina dan Erdiansyah. (2021). Reformulasi Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pemberian Sanksi Pidana Bersyarat. JOM Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau, VIII(1), 1–15.

Enrico Simanjuntak, (2021). Kewenangan PTUN Mengadili Perkara Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pemerintah. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, hlm. 239-340. (n.d.).

Harahap, M. Y. (2001). Kedudukan, Kewenangan, dan Acara Peradilan Agama. Sinar Grafika.

Harun, M. (2016). Reformulasi Kebijakan Hukum Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Pidana Pemilu Dalam Menjaga Kedaulatan Negara. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 5(1), 213. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v5i1.7

Indroharto, (2004). Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Buku I Beberapa pengertian Dasar Hukum Tata Usaha Negara, Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, hlm 145. (n.d.).

Lim, J. (2010). Korean Constitutional Court and the due process clause. Litigation in Korea, 6(1), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805179.00013

Maksum, H. (2020). Batasan Kewenangan Mengadili Pengadilan Umum dan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Yang Melibatkan Badan Negara atau Pejabat Pemerintah Ditinjau Dari Perma Nomor 2 Tahun 2019.” JURIDICA: Jurnal Fakul. (n.d.).

MD Mahfud, (1991). Hukum dan Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi, Yogyakarta: Gema Media, hlm. 412. (n.d.).

Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti, (2018). (Onrechtmatig Overheidsdaad) oleh pemerintah dari sudut pandang UU administrasi pemerintahan, Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol. 1 No. 2, hlm. 265.

Muhcsan, SH. (1981). Seri Hukum Administrasi Negara Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara Indonesia.Yogyakarta:Liberty. hlm. 1. (n.d.).

Nur Yanto, (2015). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara Indonesia, Jakarta. Mitra Wacana Media, 2015. hlm. 7. (n.d.).

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, (2014).Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi), ed. 13, Revisi Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group. h. 133. (n.d.).

Philipus M. Hadjon, (2015). Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Konteks Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan”, Jurnal hukum dan Peradilan, Volume 4 nomor 1, hlm.52. (n.d.).

Ratnasari, P. (2023). Bahas Putusan PN Jakpus Soal Penundaan Pemilu ke Tahun 2025, Ahli Hukum Tata Negara: Ini Sangat Bermasalah! AYOJAKARTA.COM.https://www.ayojakarta.com/news/767829537/bahas-putusan-pn-jakpus-soal-penundaan-pemilu-ke-tahun-2025-ahli-hukum-tata-negara-ini-sangat-bermasalah

Ridwan, (2022). Pengujian Tindakan Faktual dan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum oleh Pemerintah dalam sistem PTUN, Udayana Master Law Journal, Vol.11 No.1, hlm. 89-108. (n.d.).

Ridwan HR, (2007). Hukum Administrasi Negara, Rajawali Pers. hlm. 301. (n.d.).

Safri Nugraha, et al., (2007). Hukum Administrasi Negara, Depok: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, hlm. 85. (n.d.).

Santoso, H. A. (2021). Perspektif Keadilan Hukum Teori Gustav Radbruch Dalam Putusan PKPU “PTB.” Jatiswara, 36(3), 325–334. https://jatiswara.unram.ac.id/index.php/js/article/view/341

Soekanto, S. dan S. M. (2006). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sudikno Mertokusumo. (2008). Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar (Edisi Kelima).Yogyakarta:Liberty.

Wahyuni, T. (2023). Pemilu 2024: Gugatan Partai Prima “salah kamar”, putusan Pengadilan Tinggi “harus jadi acuan” bagi gugatan lain yang meminta pemilu ditunda. BBC News Indonesia. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/cp3jlr8e3exo




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v15i1.22110

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Hasil gambar untuk morarefImage result for isjdHasil gambar untuk google scholarHasil gambar untuk sinta dikti    

Address: Yudisia Research Center, Department of Islamic Family Law, Sharia Faculty, IAIN Kudus; Jl. Conge Ngembalrejo, Ngembal Rejo, Ngembalrejo, Kec. Bae, Kabupaten Kudus, Jawa Tengah 59322


Yudisia : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam by Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam (Ahwal Syakhshiyah) Fakultas Syariah IAIN Kudus is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.