Student Involvement Within Islamic Teacher Education: For a Future Profession
Abstract
The purpose of this article was to explore student involvement in teaching and learning, focusing on the experiences of third-year students in the Indonesian Islamic Education Study Program teacher program. Student involvement was defined as having three aspects: students exhibit active classroom participation, students influence the curriculum design, and students feel they are part of the community. The findings were reported based on interview studies and process analysis, the involvement of learning methods, and the motivation for student involvement. The findings revealed that students had multiple understandings of student involvement and that the level of involvement depended on student and lecturer involvement, expectations, and responsibilities. Student lecturers also linked student involvement to the use of teaching methods, learning, and their future professions as teachers of Islamic religious education. Students mainly discussed intrinsic motivation (beneficial for learning) for student involvement, but traces of altruistic motivation (civics learning) were also observed. Extrinsic motivation (university benefits), however, was absent. Voices of resistance to student involvement were also present; these students preferred lecturer-led education and were unaccustomed to high levels of involvement. Student understanding of engagement challenges the lecturer–student role in the education of teachers in Islamic religious education specifically, and in Islamic higher education in general. Acknowledging students’ diverse understanding of student involvement is important. Overall, based on student experience, involvement creates participation and the motivation to study here and now and for future professions. Studies show that student involvement has inherent value beyond the benefits of measurable outcomes, in which the use of teaching, engagement, and learning methods for future professions is promoted.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aalai, A. (2020). College Student Reactions to Holocaust Education from the Perspective of the Theme of Complicity and Collaboration, Journal of Transformative Education, 18(3), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344620914863
Abdelkader, D. (2023). MODERN HISTORY AND POLITICS-Islam, Justice, and Democracy. The Middle East Journal, 76(4), 554-556.
Albrecht, J. R.&Karabenick, S. A. (2018). Relevance for Learning and Motivation in Education, Journal of Experimental. DOI: 10.1080/00220973.2017.1380593.
Ali, H. F., Chaudhary, A., & Islam, T. (2023). How does responsible leadership enhance work engagement? The roles of knowledge sharing and helping initiative behavior. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.
Amril, M. (2017). SELF-PURIFICATION DALAM PEMIKIRAN ETIKA ISLAM: Suatu Telaah Atas Pemikiran Etika Raghib al-Isfahani dan Refleksinya dalam Mengatasi Qua Vadis Modernitas. Al-Fikra: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman, 2(1), 1-17.
Arseven, I. (2018). The Use of Qualitative Case Studies as an Experiential Teaching Method in the Training of Pre-Service Teachers. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(1), 111-125.
Baron, P., & Corbin, L. (2012). Student engagement: Rhetoric and reality. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), 759–772. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.655711.
Bergmark, U., & Westman, S. (2016). Co-creating curriculum in higher education – promoting democratic values and a multidimensional view on learning. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 28–40. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2015.1120734.
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 17(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Bovill, C. (2014). An investigation of co-created curricula within higher education in the UK, Ireland and the USA. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(1), 15–25. doi:10.1080/14703297.2013.770264.
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2), 195–208. doi:10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
Broucker, B., De Wit, K., & Verhoeven, J. C. (2018). Higher education for public value: Taking the debate beyond new public management. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(2). doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1370441.
Cook-Sather, A. (2014). Student-faculty partnership in explorations of pedagogical practice: A threshold concept in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(3), 186–198. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2013.805694
Cook-Sather, A. (2015). Dialogue across diferences of position, perspective, and identity: Reflective practice in/on a student-faculty pedagogical partnership program. Teachers College Record, 117 (2), 1–29.
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching. A guide for faculty. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Gourlay, L. (2015). ‘Student engagement’ and the tyranny of participation. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(4), 402–411. doi:10.1080/13562517.2015.1020784
Daniels, J.R. and Hebard, H. (2018), «Complicity, responsibility and authorization: A praxis of critical questioning for White literacy educators», English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 17(1), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-05-2017-0073
Garry Hornby & Ian Blackwell (2018) Barriers to parental involvement in education: an update, Educational Review, 70:1, 109-119, DOI: 10.1080/00131911.2018.1388612
Geron, T. & Levinson, M. (2018). Intentional collaboration, predictable complicity, and proactive prevention: U.S. schools’ ethical responsibilities in slowing the school-to-deportation pipeline, Journal of Global Ethics, 14(1), 23-33, DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2018.1497677
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
Groccia, J. E. (2018). What is student engagement?. New directions for teaching and learning, 2018(154), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20287
Ha, P. L. (2018). Higher education, English, and the idea of ‘the West’: globalizing and encountering a global south regional university, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39(5), 782-797, DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2018.1448704
Halomoan, I. S., Moeis, I., & Yakubu, A. (2023). An overview of the Strength of Implementing Democratic Values in an Islamic Boarding School Atmosphere. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(2), 190-206. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v6i2.2865
Hamzah, H., Tambak, S., Hamzah, M. L., Purwati, A. A., Irawan, Y., & Umam, M. I. H. (2022). Effectiveness of Blended Learning Model Based on Problem-Based Learning in Islamic Studies Course. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 775-792. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15242a.
Kaplan, A., Garner, J. K. & Brock, B. (2019). Identity and Motivation in a Changing World: A Complex Dynamic Systems Perspective. Motivation in Education at a Time of Global Change; Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 20: 101-127. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0749-742320190000020006.
Karim, A. (2022). Integration of Religious Awareness in Environmental Education. QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies), 10(2), 415-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v10i2.14404
Karabulut‐Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N. & Jahren, C.T. (2018), A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education. British Journalof Educational Technology, 49: 398-411. doi:10.1111/bjet.12548
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2014). Den kvalitativa for skning sintervjun (3.[rev.]ed.) [The qualitative research interview]. Lund: Student litteratur.
Leticia Palomin (2020) The missing piece in higher education: Latina/o/x parent involvement in the pre-college preparation process from the South Texas border region, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2020.1783468
Lodge, J.M., Alhadad, S. S. J., Lewis, M.J. et al. (2017). Inferring Learning from Big Data: The Importance of a Transdisciplinary and Multidimensional Approach. Tech Know Learn 22, 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9330-3
Masika, R., & Jones, J. (2016). Building student belonging and engagement: Insights into higher education students’ experiences of participating and learning together. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(2), 138–150. http://doi:10.1080/13562517.2015.1122585
Masturin, M., Ritonga, M. R., & Amaroh, S. (2022). Tawhid-Based Green Learning in Islamic Higher Education: An Insan Kamil Character Building. QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies), 10(1), 215-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v10i1.14124
Medina, A. (2023). Islam in Mexico: Diversity, Accommodations, and Perspectives on Approach. International Journal of Latin American Religions, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41603-023-00193-x
Muhlisin, M., Kholis, N., & Rini, J. (2023). Navigating the Nexus: Government Policies in Cultivating Religious Moderation Within State Islamic Higher Education. QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies), 11(1), 207-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v11i1.12677
Mulyana, R., Kurahman, O. T., & Fauzi, R. (2023). Professional Development for Islamic Religious Education and Madrasah Teacher. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v0i0.23511
Nancy E. Hill, Dawn P. Witherspoon & Deborah Bartz (2018) Parental involvement in education during middle school: Perspectives of ethnically diverse parents, teachers, and students, The Journal of Educational Research, 111:1, 12-27, DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2016.1190910
Nurhayati, D. A. W. (2023). Students’ Reaction on Operating Rhetorical Strategies in Promoting Linguistic Skills and Cultural Diversity at Islamic Multicultural Classrooms. Dinamika Ilmu, 23(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v23i1.6036
Page, A.G., Chahboun, S. (2019). Emerging empowerment of international students: how international student literature has shifted to include the students’ voices. High Education, 78, 871–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00375-7.
Peter Unwin, Joy Rooney & Charmaine Cole (2018) Service user and carer involvement in students’ classroom learning in higher education, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42:3, 377-388, DOI: 10.1080/0309877X.2017.1281886.
Popenici, S.A.D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 12, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8
Rankin, J. & Brown, V. (2016). Creative teaching method as a learning strategy for student midwives: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today,38: 93-100.
Seale, J., Gibson, S., Haynes, J., & Potter, A. (2015). Power and resistance. Reflections on therhetoric and reality of using participatory methods to promote student voice and engagement in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(4), 534–552. doi:10.1080/0309877X. 2014.938264.
Stein, S. (2019). Critical internationalization studies at an impasse: making space for complexity, uncertainty, and complicity in a time of global challenges, Studies in Higher Education, DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1704722
Sukenti, D., & Tambak, S. (2020). Developing Indonesian Language Learning Assessments: Strengthening the Personal Competence and Islamic Psychosocial of Teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 1079-1087. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20677
Sukenti, D., Tambak, S., & Siregar, E. (2021). Learning Assessment for Madrasah Teacher: Strengthening Islamic Psychosocial and Emotional Intelligence. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(1), 725-740. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i1.552
T. J. Dunn & M. Kennedy. (2019). Technology Enhanced Learning in higher education; motivations, engagement and academic achievement. Computers & Education, 137, 104-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.004.
Tambak, S., Ahmad, M. Y., Amril, A., Sukenti, D., Hamzah, H., & Marwiyah, S. (2022). Madrasa teacher professionalism: Effects of gender and teaching experience in learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(3), 1490-1499. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i3.22539
Tambak, S., Hamzah, H., Ahmad, M. Y., Siregar, E. L., Sukenti, D., Sabdin, M., & Rohimah, R. B. (2022). Discussion method accuracy in Islamic higher education: the influence of gender and teaching duration. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 41(2), 507-520. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i2.40644
Tambak, S., Ahmad, M. Y., & Sukenti, D. (2020). Strengthening Emotional Intelligence in Developing the Madrasah Teacher’ Professionalism (Penguatan Kecerdasan Emosional dalam Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru Madrasah). Akademika, 2(90), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.17576/akad-2020-9002-03
Tambak, S., & Sukenti, D. (2020). Strengthening Islamic behavior and Islamic psychosocial in developing professional madrasah teachers. Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 39(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i1.26001.
Ulrika Bergmark & Susanne Westman (2016) Co-creating curriculum in higher education: promoting democratic values and a multidimensional view on learning, International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 28-40, DOI: 10.1080/1360144X.2015.1120734.
Virtanen, M.A., Haavisto, E., Liikanen, E. (2018). Ubiquitous learning environments in higher education: A scoping literature review. Education Information Technologies 23, 985–998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9646-6
Whitt, M.S. (2016). Other People’s Problems: Student Distancing, Epistemic Responsibility, and Injustice. Studiesin Philosophyand Education, 35, 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-015-9484-1
Yang, P. (2018). Compromise and complicity in international student mobility: the ethnographic case of Indian medical students at a Chinese university, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39(5), 694-708, DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2018.1435600
Zembylas, M. (2020). Re-conceptualizing complicity in the social justice classroom: affect, politics and anti-complicity pedagogy, Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 28(2), 317-331, DOI: 10.1080/14681366.2019.1639792
Zepke, N. (2015). Student engagement research: Thinking beyond the mainstream. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(6), 1311–1323. doi:10.1080/07294360.2015.1024635
Zepke, N. (2018). Student engagement in neo-liberal times: What is missing? Higher Education Research & Development, 37(2). doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1370440.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v11i2.8141
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.