Sharia-Based Innovation Performance: The Role of Dynamic Technological Agility and Entrepreneurial Orientation
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the relationship between dynamic technological agility based on entrepreneur orientation and network resources towards sharia-based innovation performance and competitive advantage in small medium enterprises of Muslim fashion. Specifically, this study argues that dynamic technological agility moderates the relationship between entrepreneur orientation and network resources with sharia-based innovation performance and competitive advantage. Managers and owners of small medium enterprises at Muslim fashion were chosen as the primary focus of this study. 200 questionnaires were distributed managers and owners of small medium enterprises at Muslim fashion. Following the analysis of data from 163 managers and owners of small medium enterprises at Muslim fashion, empirical testing shows that the entrepreneur orientation and the network resources influences the dynamic technological agility and has a strong correlation. This research finds that dynamic technological agility has a significant impact on sharia-based innovation performance. Meanwhile, the dynamic technological agility and the sharia-based innovation performance influences the competitive advantage.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alegre, J., & Chiva, R. (2013). Linking Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance: The Role of Organizational Learning Capability and Innovation Performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(4), 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12005
Chatwani, N. (2019). Organisational Agility: Exploring the Impact of Identity on Knowledge Management. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17249-7_1.
Chen, C.-J. (2019). Developing a model for supply chain agility and innovativeness to enhance firms’ competitive advantage. Management Decision.
Gulati, R., Lavie, D., & Madhavan, R. R. (2011). How do networks matter? The performance effects of interorganizational networks. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 207–224.
Hair Jr, J. F., LDS Gabriel, M., Silva, D. da, & Braga, S. (2019). Development and validation of attitudes measurement scales: Fundamental and practical aspects. RAUSP Management Journal, 54(4), 490–507.
Halim, H. A., Ahmad, N. H., Taghizadeh, S. K., Ramayah, T., & Mohamad, M. N. (2015). Promoting innovative performance through social embeddedness: An analysis on innovative human capital among SMEs. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 6(2), 81.
Harvey, V. S., & De Meuse, K. P. (2021). The age of agility: Building learning agile leaders and organizations. Oxford University Press.
Helfat, C. E., & Winter, S. G. (2011). Untangling Dynamic and Operational Capabilities: Strategy for the (N)ever‐Changing World. Strategic Management Journal, 32(11), 1243–1250. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.955
Lanza, A., & Passarelli, M. (2014). Technology Change and Dynamic Entrepreneurial Capabilities. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(3), 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12042
Liu, H., & Yang, H. (2019). Managing Network Resource and Organizational Capabilities to Create Competitive Advantage for SMEs in a Volatile Environment. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(sup2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12449
Lonial, S. C., & Carter, R. E. (2015). The Impact of Organizational Orientations on Medium and Small Firm Performance: A Resource-Based Perspective. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 94–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12054
Matsuno, K., Mentzer, J. T., & Özsomer, A. (2002). The Effects of Entrepreneurial Proclivity and Market Orientation on Business Performance. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.3.18.18507
McGee, J. E., & Peterson, M. (2019). The Long‐Term Impact of Entrepreneurial Self‐Efficacy and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Venture Performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(3), 720–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12324
Mikalef, P., & Pateli, A. (2017). Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Journal of Business Research, 70, 1–16.
Muna, N., Yasa, N., Ekawati, N., Wibawa, I., Sriathi, A., & Adi, I. (2022). Market entry agility in the process of enhancing firm performance: A dynamic capability perspective. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(1), 99–106.
Newey, L. R., & Zahra, S. A. (2009). The Evolving Firm: How Dynamic and Operating Capabilities Interact to Enable Entrepreneurship. British Journal of Management, 20(s1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00614.x
Patel, P. C., Kohtamäki, M., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2015). Entrepreneurial orientation‐as‐experimentation and firm performance: The enabling role of absorptive capacity. Strategic Management Journal, 36(11), 1739–1749. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2310
Poudel, K. P., Carter, R., & Lonial, S. (2019). The Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation, Technological Capability, and Consumer Attitude on Firm Performance: A Multi‐Theory Perspective. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(sup2), 268–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12471
Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance: An Assessment of past Research and Suggestions for the Future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00308.x
Saeed, S., Yousafzai, S. Y., & Engelen, A. (2014). On Cultural and Macroeconomic Contingencies of the Entrepreneurial Orientation–Performance Relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 255–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12097
Slevin, D. P., & Terjesen, S. A. (2011). Entrepreneurial Orientation: Reviewing Three Papers and Implications for Further Theoretical and Methodological Development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 973–987. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00483.x
Su, Z., Xie, E., & Wang, D. (2015). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Managerial Networking, and New Venture Performance in China. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 228–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12069
Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: Risk, Uncertainty, and Strategy in the Innovation Economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13
Tilman, L. M., & Jacoby, C. (2019). Agility: How to Navigate the Unknown and Seize Opportunity in a World of Disruption. Missionday.
Urban, B., & Maphumulo, M. (2022). The moderating effects of entrepreneurial orientation on technological opportunism and innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(3), 901–921.
Wales, W. J., Covin, J. G., & Monsen, E. (2020). Entrepreneurial orientation: The necessity of a multilevel conceptualization. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14(4), 639–660. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1344
Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71–91.
Yang, C., & Liu, H.-M. (2012). Boosting firm performance via enterprise agility and network structure. Management Decision, 50(6), 1022–1044.
Yin, M., Hughes, M., & Hu, Q. (2021). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture resource acquisition: Why context matters. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(4), 1369–1398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-020-09718-w
Yoon, S. N., Lee, D., & Schniederjans, M. (2016). Effects of innovation leadership and supply chain innovation on supply chain efficiency: Focusing on hospital size. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113, 412–421.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/iqtishadia.v17i2.30605
Copyright (c) 2025 IQTISHADIA
Iqtishadia Journal Indexed by :
Iqtishadia : Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.