Studi Komparasi Kinerja Bank Perkreditan Rakyat (BPR) Syariah dan Konvensional di Sumatera Barat
Abstract
Rural Banks (BPR) have an important role in supporting the Indonesian economy through the provision of financial access to the society and micro, small and medium enterprises. Indonesia has implemented a dual-banking system as its banking system - Islamic banking and conventional banking systems - and BPR are possible to select each of the system to be implemented. In the rapid development of the financial industry Islamic and conventional BPR must be able to compete with other financial institutions like non-bank financing companies. So that, there is an importance to examine the success factor of BPR with the different systems in order to strengthen their position in its industry. This study aims to examine the factors that determines the performance of rural banks (BPR) and make a comparison between the BPR with Islamic and conventional systems in the West Sumatra province. To test the performance of rural banks various financial ratios based on the CAMEL framework are used, including ratio of Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Management, Earnings and Liquidity. The method used is quantitative method by using one-way ANOVA and Multiple Linear Regression to the panel data of Islamic and conventional BPR in 2011-2015 period. The results show that there are differences in the factors that determines the performance of Islamic and Conventional BPR.
Bank Perkreditan Rakyat (BPR) memiliki peran penting dalam mendukung perekonomian Indonesia melalui penyediaan akses keuangan untuk masyarakat ekonomi lemah dan usaha mikro, kecil dan menengah. Indonesia telah mengimplementasikan dual-banking system sebagai sistem perbankannya yaitu sistem perbankan syariah dan sistem perbankan konvensional dan BPR juga dimungkinkan untuk memilih masing-masing sistem tersebut. Ditengah pesatnya perkembangan industri keuangan saat ini BPR syariah dan konvensional harus mampu bertahan dari persaingan yang diberikan lembaga keuangan lainnya seperti perusahaan pembiayaan non-bank. Untuk itu perlu diketahui apa saja faktor yang menjadi penentu kesuksesan BPR dan bagaimana perbedaan karakteristik yang menjadi penentu kesuksesan BPR dengan sistem yang berbeda tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji faktor-faktor yang menjadi penentu kinerja bank perkreditan rakyat (BPR) serta melakukan komparasi antara BPR dengan sistem syariah dan konvensional di Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Untuk menguji kinerja BPR tersebut digunakan berbagai rasio keuangan berdasarkan framework CAMEL yang meliputi rasio Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Management, Earnings dan Liquidity. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kuantitatif dengan menggunakan one-way ANOVA dan Multiple Linear Regression terhadap data panel dari BPR syariah dan BPR konvensional di Provinsi Sumatera Barat dalam rentang waktu 2011-2015. Hasil analisis memperlihatkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan faktor-faktor yang menjadi penentu kinerja BPR Syariah dan BPR Konvensional.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barr, R. S., Killgo, K. A., Siems, T. F., & Zimmel, S. (2002).
Evaluating the Productive Efficiency and Performance of U.S.
Commercial Banks. Managerial Finance, 28(8), 3-25.
Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A. & Merrouche, O. (2010). Islamic
finance vs. Conventional banking business model, efficiency and stability. World Bank.
Chapra, A,U.& Khan, T. (2012). Regulation and supervision of Islamic Banks. Islamic Development Bank: Islamic Research & Training Institute. Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Deephouse, D.L. (1999). To be different, or to be the same?
It`s a question (and theory) of strategic balance, Strategic Management Journal, 20. 147-166.
Garcia, J.B.D., & Sabate, J.M.D.L.F (2010).How do CEO emotions matter? Impact of CEO affective traits on strategic and performance conformity in the Spanish banking industry, Strategic Management Journal, 31. 562-574.
Handika, R.F & Fransisca, R. J. (2016). Menuju Keunggulan
Bersaing Berkelanjutan Berbasis Resource-Based View – Studi UKM di Sumatera Barat, Proceeding Seminar Nasional “Optimasi Industri Kreatif Untuk Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Nasional Yang Berkelanjutan” Jurusan Manajemen, Universitas Andalas. Padang
Hanif, M., Tariq, M., Tahir, A. and Wajeeh-ul, M. (2012),
“Comparative performance study of conventional and Islamic banking in Pakistan”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economic, Vol. 83. 62-72.
Ika, S. R., & Abdullah, N. (2011). A comparative study of
Financial performance of Islamic banks and conventional banks in Indonesia. International Journal of business and Social sciences. Vol. 2 (15): 199-207
Jaffar, M., & Manarvi, I. (2011). Performance comparison of
Islamic and conventional banks in Pakistan. Global journal of Management and Business Research, Vol. 11 (1): 61-66.
Loghod, H.A., 2008. Do islamic banks perform better than conventional banks? Evidence from gulf cooperation council countries. Journal of Management, 10(58): 168-187.
Merchant, I. P. (2012). Empirical Study of Islamic Banks Versus Conventional Banks of GCC. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12 (20): 33-42.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (2015). Statistik Perbankan Syariah. Departemen Perizinan dan Informasi Perbankan OJK, Jakarta
Parashar, S.P., (2010). How did islamic banks do during global financial crisis? Banks and Bank Systems, 5(4): 54 - 62.
Rahman, S., Farzand, A. K., Kurshed, I. & Zafar, A. (2012).
Parameters of conventional and Islamic Bank’s profitability in Pakistan: Evaluation of Internal Factor. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 3 (3): 11-19.
Rashwan, M., (2010). A comparison between islamic and
traditional banks: Pre and post the financial crisis. International Academy of Business and Public Administration Disciplines, 12(8): 130-145.
Safiullah, M. (2010). Superiority of Conventional Banks and
Islamic Banks of Bangladesh: A Comparative Industry. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2 (3): 199-207.
Samad, A. (2004). Performance of Interest-free Islamic banks vis-à-vis Interest-based Conventional Banks of Bahrain. IIUM Journal of Economics and Management, 12(2): 1-15.
Shaista, W. & Umadevi, N. G. (2013). Comparative study of the performance of Islamic and conventional banks: The case of Malaysia. Humanomics, 29 (1), 43-60.
Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System (1997). Statements of Policy. The United States: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
Viverita, (2010). Performance analysis of Indonesian islamic
and conventional banks. Social Science Research Research Network, No. 186893.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/iqtishadia.v10i1.2318
Copyright (c) 2017 IQTISHADIA (Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam)
Iqtishadia Journal Indexed by :
Iqtishadia : Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.