Development of an Ecoliteracy Capacity Measurement Instrument for Students
Abstract
This research is aimed at developing and validating instruments to measure ecoliteracy capabilities, so that this research can produce a product in the form of a measurement instrument that has been validated and is used for measuring the ability to ecoliterate students. This research and development uses the ADDIE development method. This instrument is based on the Basic Competence of Class X Biology lessons, which consists of three dimensions of ecoliteracy. Based on 30 issues developed, there are 18 right and 12 wrong. The results of the analysis were obtained 15 questions on the dimension of knowledge, 2 questions about the dimensions of concern, and 1 questions about practical competence dimensions. Based on the differential power test, there were six bad criteria, six sufficient, three good and three very good criteria. The empirical validation was conducted by conducting trials on 36 students in the 11th grade of Mother of the Holy Heart High School in Jakarta, which were then analyzed using Pearson Product Moment correlation. The reliability test result was 0.80 using the Kuder Richardson-20 (KR-20) formula that falls within the very high criteria. It shows that the ecoliteracy measurement instrument developed is worthy of use to the students.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afifah. (2020). Pengembangan Sumber Dan Media Pembelajaran Ips Untuk Meningkatkan Ecoliteracy Peserta Didik. Jipsindo. 7(2)
Aldoobie, N. (2015). ADDIE Model. American International Journal of Contemporary Research. 5(6), 68-72. http://www.aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_5_No_6_December_2015/10.pdf
Cahyadi, R. A. H. (2019). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis ADDIE Model. Halaqa: Islamic Educational Journal. 3(1), 35-43. http://doi.org/10.21070/halaqa.v3i1.2124
Capra, F. (2007). Sustainable living, ecological literacy, and the breath of life. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education. 12, 9-18.
Capra F, Stone MK. (2010). Smart by nature: schooling for sustainability. Journal for Sustainability Education.
Dawati, F. M., Yamtinah, S., Rahardjo, S. B., Ashadi, & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2017). Uji Validitas Computerized Two-Tier Multiple Choice (CTTMC) Melalui Focus Group Discussion (FGD) Untuk Mendiagnosis Kesulitan Belajar Peserta didik. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains Universitas Sebelas Maret, 21, 260–265.
Desfandi, M., Maryani, E., & Disman. (2017). Implementasi kebijakan sekolah berwawasan lingkungan sebagai upaya mengembangkan literasi ekologis peserta didik. Social Science Education Journal. 4(2), 30-38.
Firdausi, A., & Wulandari, F. E. (2021). Development of Web-Based Science Learning Module in Improving the Students’ Understanding of Eco-Literacy. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintifika. 5(3), 241-252.
Fitriana, M. (2018). Students’ Reading Strategies in Comprehending Academic Reading: A Case Study in an Indonesian Private Collage. International Journal of Language Education, 2(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v2i2.6181
Fitriani, R. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Fisika Peserta Didik SMA Negeri 11 Pinrang. https://doi.org/10.35580/jspf.v16i1.15858
Hanafi, Y., Aprilia, N., Nurusman, A. A., Purwanto, A., Nadiroh., & Budi, S. (2021). Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Instrumen Literasi Lingkungan untuk Mahapeserta didik. JEP: Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan. 5(2), 174-180. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol
Hardani., Auliya, N. H., Andriani, H., Fardani, R.A., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., Sukmana, D. J., & Istiqomah, R. R. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Ilmu.
Hanifah, N. (2014). Perbandingan Tingkat Kesukaran, Daya Pembeda Butir Soal Dan Reliabilitas Tes Bentuk Pilihan Ganda Biasa Dan Pilihan Ganda Asosiasi Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi. SOSIO e-KONS. 6(1), 41-55.
Hunter, R. H., & Jordan, R. C. (2019). The TELA: a New Tool for Assessing Educator Environmental Literacy. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 15(1), 1-9.
Ihsan, A. F., & Hanami, Z. A. (2020). Implementasi Ekoliterasi di Era Pascaliterasi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Adiwidya 8 Pascasarjana ITB. 41-47
Iskandar, A., & Rizal, M. (2017). Analisis Kualitas Soal di Perguruan Tinggi Berbasis Aplikasi TAP. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. 21(2), 12-23. http://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i1.15609
Keraf, A.S. (2010). Etika Lingkungan Hidup. Jakarta: Buku Kompas.
Keraf, Sonny A. (2014). Filsafat Lingkungan Hidup, Alam sebagai Sebuah Sistem Kehidupan (bersama Fritjop Capra). Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Kusumaningrum, D. 2018. Literasi Lingkungan dalam Kurikulum 2013 dan Pembelajaran IPA
di SD. Indonesian Journal of Natural Science Education (IJNSE). Vol 1 (2): 57-64.
Kusumaningrum, D. 2018. Literasi Lingkungan dalam Kurikulum 2013 dan Pembelajaran IPA
di SD. Indonesian Journal of Natural Science Education (IJNSE). Vol 1 (2): 57-64.
Kusumaningrum, D. 2018. Literasi Lingkungan dalam Kurikulum 2013 dan Pembelajaran IPA
di SD. Indonesian Journal of Natural Science Education (IJNSE). Vol 1 (2): 57-64.
Kusumaningrum, D. 2018. Literasi Lingkungan dalam Kurikulum 2013 dan Pembelajaran IPA di SD. Indonesian Journal of Natural Science Education (IJNSE). Vol 1 (2): 57-64.
Lestariyanti, E., & Hakim, M. A. (2020). Qaryah Thayyibah: Reposisi Eco-Literacy Melalui Pendidikan Berbasis Masyarakat. BRILIANT: Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual. 5(3), 573-583. http://dx.doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v3i4.483
Louv, R. (2012). The nature principle: reconnecting with life in a virtual age. Chapel Hill (NC): Algonquin Books.
McBride, B.B, C.A Brewer, A. R. Berkowitz, & W. T Borrie. (2013). Environmental literacy, ecological literacy, ecoliteracy; what do we mean and how did we get here? Ecosphere, 4(5), 1-20.
McGinn, A.E. (2014). Quantifying and understanding ecological literacy: a study of first year student at liberal arts institutions. Pennsylvania: Dickinson Collage.
Noverita, A., Darliana, E., & Siregar, Z. (2021). The Development of Environmental Education Based on Ecoliteracy Module to Improve Global Perspective Ability on Students of Social Studies Education. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). 4(4), 11461-11468.
Nurfajriani, N., Azrai, E. P., & Sigit, D. V. (2018). Hubungan Ecoliteracy dengan Perilaku Pro-Lingkungan Peserta Didik SMP. Jurnal Biologi dan Pembelajarannya. 5(1), 63-69.
Nurlaily, S., Supriatna, N., & Sapriya. (2018). Pengenalan Ecoliteracy Melalui Media Pembelajaran dari Sampah di Sekolah Dasar. Journal of Education. 1(2), 76-87.
Pitman, S. D., Cristopher B. D., & Paul, C. S. (2017). Ecological literacy and psychographics: lifestyle contributors to ecological knowledge and understanding. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology.
Purwanto. (2007). Instrumen Penelitian Sosial dan Pendidikan: Pengembangan dan Pemanfaatan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Putrawan, I Made. (2022). Prinsip prinsip logis metodologi penelitian kuantitatif. Bandung: Tim Sadari.
Rahmadyah Kusuma Putri (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Literasi Sains Peserta didik Pada Topik Keanekaragaman Makhluk Hidup. Diklabio: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Biologi. 4 (1), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.33369/Diklabio.4.1.71-78
Ratna dan Rusdiana (2013). Evaluasi pembelajaran dengan pendekatan kurikulum 2013. Pustaka Setia Bandung
Retnawati, H. (2016). Proving Content Validity of Self-Regulated Learning Scale(The Comparison of Aiken and Expanded Gregory Index). Research and Evaluation in Education, 2(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i2.11029
Safei, Muh. (2008). Media pengajaran. Makassar: UIN Alauddin Makassar.
Sarwono, J. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, h. 99.
Setiyawan, A. (2014). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Reliabilitas Tes. Jurnal An Nur. 6(2), 341-354.
Siregar, M., Meilani, S. M., & Purwanto, A. (2021). Pengenalan Ecoliteracy pada Anak Usia Dini melalui Metode Bercerita. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. 5(1), 719-728. http://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v5i1.700
Sofyan, A., Feronika, T., & Milama, B, (2006). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: UIN Jakarta Press, h. 103.
Solichin, Mujianto. (2017). Analisis Daya Beda Soal, Taraf Kesukaran, Validitas Butir Tes, Interpretasi Hasil Tes, dan Validitas Ramalan dalam Evaluasi Pendidikan. Dirasat: Jurnal Manajemen & Pendidikan Islam, 2 (2)
Sudjana, N. (2008). Penilaian Hasil Belajar Proses Belajar Mengajar, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, h.55.
Sugihartini, N., & Yudiana, K. (2018). ADDIE sebagai Model Pengembangan Media Instruksional Edukatif (MIE) Mata Kuliah Kurikulum dan Pengajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan. 15(2), 277-286. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPTK/issue/view/851
Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: PT Alfabeta.
Tyas, D. N., Nurharini, A., Wulandari, D., & Isdaryanti, B. (2021). Peningkatan Kemampuan Ecoliteracy melalui Inovasi Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Kahoot Games Subtema Pemanfaatan SDA Hayati dan Nonhayati untuk Peserta didik SD. Qalam: Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan. 10(2), 115-125.
Vonny, V., Nihlah, K., Miarsyah, M., & Ristanto, R. H. (2021). Mempromosikan Literasi Biologi kepada Peserta didik Sekolah Menengah: Pengembangan Instrumen Tes untuk Kelas VII. Bioedusiana: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi. 6(2), 251-259.
Yonanda, D. A., Supriatna, N., Hakam, K. A., & Sopandi, W. (2022). Kebutuhan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Indramayu Untuk Menumbuhkan Ecoliteracy Peserta didik Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas. 8(1), 173-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v8i1.1927
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/jobe.v7i1.15116
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jobe Journal Indexed by :
