The Creative Thinking Skill of Biological Learning Students at Candi Baru High School
Abstract
The aim of this study was to describe the skill of students to think creatively about Biology at Candi Baru high school (HS). The study used a qualitative approach using a case study method. The population in this study was students of Candi Baru HS from the academic year 2016/2017. This research uses randomized cluster sampling. Samples were XI Mathematic and Science (MIA) 6, 7, and 8 classes. Data collected by observation and document collection, using a human instrument, an observation sheet and a categorization sheet. Data research included the quality of the student's; answers, works, and responses during the learning process. Data analysis was carried out descriptively by comparing the results of the research with information derived from literature or theory. The results showed that students' level of creative thinking skill is still low and the assessment provided by the teacher has not reached the students' creative thinking skill.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agustianingsih, R., & Mahmudi, A. (2019). How to design open-ended questions? : Literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1320(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012003
Beghetto, R. A. (2010). Creativity in the Classroom. In Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 447–463). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1968.tb00110.x
Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815–843. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20171
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design (Pendekatan kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y., Fokialis, P., & Kabouropoulou, M. (2012). Thinking about Creativity in Science Education. Creative Education, 03(05), 603–611. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.35089
Hui, M. F. (2003). Problems and Issues of the Teaching and Learning of Creativity in Hong Kong Schools. Apjted, 6(1), 103–124.
King, F., Goodson, L., & Faranak Rohani, M. (2011). Higher Order Thinking Skills • Definition • Teaching Strategies • Assessment A publication of the Educational Services Program, now known as the Center for Advancement of Learning and Assessment. In Center for Advancement of Learning and Assessment. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2016/lee.pdfhttp://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2016/lee.pdf%0Awww.cala.fsu.edu%0Awww.ascd.org/memberbooks%0Awww.21stcenturyskills.org%0Ahttp://www.
Laelasari, I., & Sholehah, I. (2021). The Relationship Between Student ’ s Creativity and Cognitive Learning Outcome Through the Implementation of Project Based Learning on Biology. Journal of Biology Education, 4(2), 61–71. Retrieved from https://journal.iainkudus.ac.id/index.php/jbe/article/view/10178
Livingston, B. S. a. (2009). Constructed-Response Test Questions: Why We Use Them; How We Score Them. R & D Connections, 11(11), 1–8. Retrieved from http://144.81.87.152/Media/Research/pdf/RD_Connections11.pdf
Papaleontiou- Louca, E., Varnava-Marouchou, D., Mihai, S., & Konis, E. (2014). Teaching for Creativity in Universities. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v3n4a13
Piawa, C. Y. (2010). Building a test to assess creative and critical thinking simultaneously. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.062
Tofade, T., Elsner, J., & Haines, S. T. (2013). Best practice strategies for effective use of questions as a teaching tool. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(7). https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe777155
Valenti, S., Neri, F., & Cucchiarelli, A. (2003). An Overview of Current Research on Automated Essay Grading. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 2, 319–330. https://doi.org/10.28945/331
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/jobe.v4i2.10187
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jobe Journal Indexed by :
