Dimensi Estetika dan Identitas Budaya dalam Bangunan Keraton Surakarta
Abstract
Karaton Kasunanan Surakarta is one of the important historic sites in the spread procces of Islam in java. Acculturation between several aspects that manifested in building are symbols full of meaning that is interesting to discuss. This article wants to discuss about the aesthetic dimensions and cultural identity stored in the Surakarta Kasunanan palace building. Through symbol theory and identity, the interim findings in this paper are firstly the aesthetics and cultural identity which are much associated with beauty in Javanese terminology cannot be separated from being appropriate, inappropriate, and beautiful, not beautiful. Secondly, in the context of identity, there are stored messages that represent Islamic teachings and Javanese-European culture. As for the whole, the structure of the building in the palace of the Surakarta Sunanate keeps the symbolic meaning of human purification into a human being through several ways in the teachings of Tariqah.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
avi marlina. (2003). gapura dan kori karaton kasunanan surakarta dalam aspek simbolis.
Barker, C. (2009). Cultural Studies.
Cessirer, E. (1987). Manusia dan Kebudayaan Sebuah Esei Tentang Manusia ( alois a Nugroho (ed.)).
Dwi Ratna Nurhajarini, D. (1999). Sejarah Kerajaan Tradisional Surakarta. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.
Friedman, J. (1995). Cultural Identity and Global Process.
Hobart, M. (2013). Theoretical Issues in the Study of Society and Culture.
Jenkins, R. (2004). Social Identity (second edi). Routledge.
KGPH Poeger. (2019). Unsur dalam Bangunan Keraton Kasunanan Surakarta.
Koentjaraningrat. (2010). Manusia dan Kebudayaan di Indonesia. Djambatan.
Manalu, S. R., Santosa, H. P., & Luqman, Y. (2007). Teori Relational Dialectics Dalam Konteks Relasi Budaya Jawa. JIS: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 6(1).
Natsir, M. (1988). Kebudayaan Islam dalam Perspektif Sejarah. Girimukti Pasaka.
Nilasari, R. (2013). Analisis Morfosemantis Nama-nama Bangunan di Kompleks Keraton Surakarta. UNY.
Projosujitno. (1956). Keraton Surakarta. Perpustakaan Keraton Surakarta.
Rapoport, A. (1982). The Meaning of The Built Environtment ‘a Non Verbal Communication’’.’
Roberton, R. (1980). Agama dalam Analisa dan Interpretasi Sosiologis. Rajawali Press.
Roikan. (2013). Gapura Kampung dan Ketahanan Identitas. Ranah, 80–87.
Rully. (2013). Perwujudan Simbolisme Lansekap Sitihinggil Utara Keraton Surakarta Hadiningrat.
Sajid, R. . (1984). Babad Sala. Perpustakaan Istana Mangkunegaran.
Santosa, I. (2007). Kajian Estetika dan Unsur Pendukungnya pada Keraton Surakarta. 1(1), 108–127.
Sari, G. P. (2010). Sasana Sewaka: Tinjauan Semantik Arsitektur Jawa Kraton Kasunanan Surakarta. Dimensi Interior, Vol. 8, No. 1, Juni 2010: 38-43, 8(1), 8–43.
Suseno, F. M. (1984). Etika Jawa. Gramedia.
Winarti. (2002). sekilas sejarah Karaton Surakarta. Sukoharjo:Cendrawasih.
Woodward, M. R. (1999). Islam Jawa (H. Salim (ed.); 1st ed.). LKiS.
Yunianti, E. (2015). Estetika Unsur-unsur Arsitektur Bangunan Masjid Agung Surakarta. Catharsis: Journal of Arts Education, 4(1).
Informan Kunci:
KGPH Poeger dan Tim KGPH Poeger
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/fikrah.v8i1.6525
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 FIKRAH
