The Dynamics of Islamophobia after the September 11 Tragedy in the United States Society on Terrorism

Ardi Tri Yuwono, Andi Sebastian, Nur'irfaan Adrus bin Ngasiman, Eizzah Bukhari binti Ahad, Nara Setya Wiratama, Agus Budianto

Abstract


Nationalism can be seen as a double-edged sword, which functions as a binding of a nation's identity but can also trigger Islamophobia and terrorism. After the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States, the country began accusing various groups and countries of being involved in acts of terrorism through Islamophobia by promoting its nationalist spirit. This research aims to explore the side of nationalism that can contribute to the rise of Islamophobia and terrorism in the United States. The methods used in this study are historical methods and radical hermeneutics with a qualitative approach. The September 11, 2001, attacks in the United States indicate the existence of four stages that affect the development of Islamophobia and terrorism in the United States, namely: Events that create deep fear and trauma in American society, agents and mass media who began to spread fear excessively, so that the American people increasingly felt threatened and sought protection, the emergence of a figure who is considered a savior by the people of the United States, who then instigates other groups with the spirit of nationalism so that there is a division in the society of the United States; and the incited people of the United States began to demand revenge against a person or group, namely Muslims.


Keywords


Islamophobia, Nationalism, Terrorism, September 11 Attacks

References


Alam-Pérez, B. (2021). El Tribunal Especial para el Líbano y la sentencia Hariri. ¿Justicia selectiva? Revista de Estudios En Seguridad Internacional, 7(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.18847/1.14.7

Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden Words: Tabbo and The Censiring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Antonsich, M. (2023). Nations and nationalism. The Companion to Political Geography, 29(5), 417–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2023.2330760

Arayunedya, S., & Armandha, S. T. (2020). Terorisme Nasionalistis Ala Balkanisasi. SOCIETAS DEI: Jurnal Agama Dan Masyarakat, 7(1), 99–116.

Atabik, A., & Muhtador, M. (2023). Jihad and Interpretation of Religious Texts on Female Terrorists in Indonesia. Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies, 11(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v11i1.16342

Bonikowski, B., Luo, Y., & Stuhler, O. (2022). Politics as Usual? Measuring Populism, Nationalism, and Authoritarianism in U.S. Presidential Campaigns (1952–2020) with Neural Language Models. Ociological Methods & Research, 51(4), 1721–1787. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221122317

Borradori, G. (2003). Philosophy in A Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Breliana, S. A. P., & Budiono, H. (2021). Nilai Nasionalisme Mahasiswa Prodi Sejarah Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri. Prosiding SEMDIKJAR (Seminar …, 4(1), 291–297.

Bruce, G. (2013). Definition of Terrorism Social and Political Effects. Journal of Military and Veterans’ Health, 21(2), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100044260

Budianto, A., Widiatmoko, S., Afandi, Z., Pratama, A. P., & Sasmita, G. G. (2024). Identifikasi Nilai Pendidikan Karakter dalam Bingkai Teks Proklamasi Kemerdekaan Republik Indonesia. PINUS: Jurnal Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 9(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.29407/pn.v9i1.21708

Burton, J. (2023). Algorithmic extremism? The securitization of artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on radicalism, polarization and political violence. Technology in Society, 75(1), 102262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102262.

Caputo, J. D. (1997). Deconstruction in A Nutshell: A Conversation with Jacques Derrida. New York: Fordham University Press.

Chaliand, G., Blin, A., Schneider, E., Pulver, K., & Browner, J. (2007). The History of Terrorism: From Antiquity to Al Qaeda. University of California Press. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating; Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Boston: Pearson.

Ganor, B. (2015). Global Alert: The Rationality of Modern Islamist Terrorism and The Challenge to The Liberal Democratic World. Columbia Studies in Terrorism and Irregular Warfare. New York: Columbia Studies in Terrorism and Irregular Warfare. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6114-3

Glišić, I., & Vujošević, T. (2021). Zenitism and orientalism. Zbornik Akademije Umetnosti, (9), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.5937/zbaku2109029g

Gorman, J. (1992). Understanding History: An Introduction to Analytical Philosophy of History. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.

Guelke, A. (2006). Terrorism and global disorder: Political violence in the contemporary world. I. B. TAURIS. New York: I. B. TAURIS. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-5291

Hardiman, F. B. (2015). Seni Memahami Hermeneutik: Hermeneutik dari Schleiermacher Sampai Derrida. Sleman: PT Kanisius.

Harnois, C. E., Bastos, J. L., & Shariff-Marco, S. (2022). Intersectionality, Contextual Specificity, and Everyday Discrimination: Assessing the Difficulty Associated With Identifying a Main Reason for Discrimination Among Racial/Ethnic Minority Respondents. Sociological Methods & Research, 51(3), 983–1013. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124120914929

Heller, S. (2011). Iron Fists: Branding The 20th-Century Totalitarian State. London: Phaidon Press.

Heryanto, A. (2006). State Terrorism and Political Identity in Indonesia: Fatally Belonging. Routledge. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002246340800043x

Hoffman, B. (2017). Inside Terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.

Huddy, L. (2004). Fear and how it works: Science and the social sciences. Social Research, 71(4), 801–805. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2004.0052

Izzah, I. Y. U. (2013). Jacques Derrida: Dekonstruksi, Difference, serta Kritiknya Terhadap Logosentrisme dan Metafisika Kehadiran. Yogyakarta: Aditya Media Publishing.

Jensen, L. (2016). The Roots of Modern Hungarian Nationalism: National Identity Formation in Early Europe, 1600-1815. The Roots of Nationalism. Auckland: Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048530649-014

Kamenka, E. (1973). Nationalism: The Nature and Evolution of an Idea. Canberra: Australian National University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/589428

Kartodirdjo, S. (1992). Pendekatan Ilmu Sosial dalam metodelogi Sejarah. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Kean, T. H. (2007). The 9/11 Commission Report. National Commission on Terrorist Attacks. New York. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000446-197006000-00015

Khan, A. B., Bukhari, S. M. H., Roofi, Y., & Azhar, M. (2019). A Comparative Study of the Philosophical Evolution of the Doctrines of ‘ Nation ’ and ‘ Nationalism ,’ 39(2), 351–362.

Kuntowijoyo. (2018). Pengantar Imu Sejarah. Sleman: Tiara Wacana.

Kusumastuti, A., & Khoiron, A. M. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Semarang: Lembaga Pendidikan Sukarno Pressindo.

Kusumawardani, & Faturochman, A. &. (2004). Nasionalisme. Buletin Psikologi, 12(2), 61–72.

Lefebvre, H. (1971). Everyday life in modern world. Harper & Row Publishers. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

Legrand, T., & Leuprecht, C. (2021). Securing cross-border collaboration: transgovernmental enforcement networks, organized crime and illicit international political economy. Policy and Society, 40(4), 565–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1975216

Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Methods for the Social Sciences Global Edition. Harlow: Pearson.

Martin, J. L. (2023). Cognitive Plausibility and Qualitative Research. Sociological Methods & Research, 52(3), 1048–1058. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221140426

Migone, A., Howlett, M., & Howlett, A. (2024). Paradigmatic stability, ideational robustness, and policy persistence: Exploring the impact of policy ideas on policy-making. Policy and Society, 43(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puae004

Nations, U. (2018). Introduction to international terrorism. United Nations. Vienna.

Noordegraaf, M., Douglas, S., Geuijen, K., & Van Der Steen, M. (2019). Weaknesses of wickedness: a critical perspective on wickedness theory. Policy and Society, 38(2), 278–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1617970

Šalamon, K. K. (2018). Public Response To 9 / 11 in Politics : Patriotism , Fear and Language Issues. Informatol, 51(1), 34–42.

Sasmita, G. G., Joebagio, H., & Sariyatun, S. (2018). Serat Jangka Jayabaya Relasi Sastra, Sejarah Dan Nasionalisme. HISTORIA Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah, 6(2), 391. https://doi.org/10.24127/hj.v6i2.1447

Schmid, A. P. (2024). Defining Terrorism. International Centre for Counter-Terorism. The Hague: International Centre for Counter-Terorism. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315744636

Selby, K. (2024). 20 Years Later: The Lingering Health Effects of 9/11.

Simeon, J. C. (2020). Terrorism and Asylum. Terrorism and Asylum. London: School of Advanced Study University of London. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004295995

Smith, A. D. (1979). Nationalism in the Twentieth Century. Canberra: Australian National University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/20040347

Smith, A. D. (2000). The Nation in History: Historiographical Debates about Ethnicity and Nationalism. Lebanon: University Press of New England.

Smith, A. D. (2010). Nationalism: Theory, Ideology, History. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Stout, M. (2007). The Paranoia Switch: How Teror Rewires Our Brains and Reshapes Our Behavior-and How We Can Reclaim Our Courage. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Teschke, B. G. (1999). The Making of the Westphalian State-System : Social Property Relations , Geopolitics and the Myth of 1648. London School of Economics and Political Science.

Thomas, C. (2024). Iran: Background and U.S. Policy. Washington.

Tibi, B. (2012). Islamism and Islam. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Tilly, C. (2005). Terror as strategy and relational process. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 46(1–2), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715205054468

Williamson, M. (2024). Terrorism, War, and International Law: The Legality of The “Use of Force” Against Afghanistan in 2001. Oxford: Routledge.

Winkler, C. K. (2005). In The Name of Terorism: Presidents on Political Violence in The Post-World War II Era. New York: State University of New York Press.

Wiratama, N. S., Afandi, Z., Budianto, A., Anggraini, R., & Utomo, A. W. (2024). Pendidikan Politik Bung Karno Untuk Taruna Merah Putih Nganjuk Sebagai Penggerak Pemilih Pemula Dalam Pemilu 2024. MESTAKA: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(1), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.58184/mestaka.v3i1.269

Wiratama, N. S., Budianto, A., & Afandi, Z. (2021). Perkembangan Sosialisme Di Dunia Abad Ke-19 Serta Pengaruhnya Di Indonesia. Danadyaksa Historica, 1(2), 128. https://doi.org/10.32502/jdh.v1i2.4247




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/fikrah.v12i2.29162

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 FIKRAH

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



Fikrah: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan is published by

Prodi Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam IAIN Kudus incorporate with

Asosiasi Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam.

Jl. Conge Ngembalrejo Bae Kudus Po Box. 51
Phone: +6282331050629
Website: http://journal.stainkudus.ac.id/index.php/fikrah
Email: [email protected]

ISSN: 2354-6174 | EISSN: 2476-9649

Creative Commons License
Fikrah Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan by Prodi Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam Fakultas Ushuluddin IAIN Kudus is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.