Imbas Konsistensi Hukuman Mati pada Hubungan Bilateral dalam Kasus Narkoba

Moh Rosyid

Abstract


This article discusses about the debate over death penalty in the drug abuse cases. The Constitutional Court on October 30th, 2007 on the judicial review of Article 80 of the Law No 22/1997 on Drug declared that death penalty is not violating the Constitution which guarantees the right to life. Furthermore, Indonesia has ratified the International convention on narcotics and psychotropic. On the other hand, the opponent of death penalty argues that death penalty violates Article 28A of the Amendment of the Constitution that all people have the right to life. Secondly, death penalty is cruel and inhumane. Thirdly, there is possibility for false trial, and fourth, death penalty is not in-line with the reformation of penal law which imposes on restorative justice instead of retributive. Fifth, the effect is just a myth and sixth, the family becomes co-victim. Seventh, death penalty also threatened Indonesian living abroad and the last, death penalty cause the loss of Indonesia in International relations.


Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v8i2.3239

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Hasil gambar untuk morarefImage result for isjdHasil gambar untuk google scholarHasil gambar untuk sinta dikti    

Address: Yudisia Research Center, Department of Islamic Family Law, Sharia Faculty, IAIN Kudus; Jl. Conge Ngembalrejo, Ngembal Rejo, Ngembalrejo, Kec. Bae, Kabupaten Kudus, Jawa Tengah 59322


Yudisia : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam by Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam (Ahwal Syakhshiyah) Fakultas Syariah IAIN Kudus is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.