Non-Litigation Dispute Resolution Mechanism in Civil Law (Case Study at ANQ Law Firm Kudus Office)
Abstract
This research focuses on the mechanism of non-litigation dispute resolution in civil law, with a case study at the ANQ Law Firm Kudus Office. A common problem raised is the lack of understanding and application of non-litigation dispute resolution methods, such as mediation, negotiation, and arbitration, which can avoid lengthy and costly court proceedings. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of non-litigation dispute resolution mechanisms and the obstacles faced in their implementation. The research method used in this research uses field research with a qualitative approach. How to collect data by observation, documentation and interviews. Meanwhile, data analysis is carried out through data reduction, then displaying data and then verifying the data. The results of the research show that the resolution of non-litigation disputes in civil law at the ANQ law firm office is through visits to the homes of problematic members to deliberate and provide legal education to arouse the awareness of problematic members so that peace is created. This article asserts that while non-litigation mechanisms are effective in most cases, it is important to increase legal awareness and understanding among the public in order to maximize the potential of these methods in civil dispute resolution.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Books
Abbas, S. (2009). As-Sulhu Dalam Hukum Syariah. Hukum Adat dan HukumNasional. Kencana.
Al-Syathibi, I. B. M. (n.d.). al Muwafaqat fi Ushul al Syari’ah, jld. 1, juz 2,. Dar al Kutub al Ilmiyah.
Amriani, N. (2012). Mediasi Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Pengadilan. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Gilles, M. (2024). Arbitration’s unraveling. University OfPennsylvania Law Review, 172(1063).
Gilson, R. J., Hansmann, H., Krepel, J., Lasak, J., Macchiati, A., Milhaupt, C., Pistor, K., Ramseyer, M., Rock, E., Roe, M., Schuck, P., Stephan, P., Vieira, J., & Whitehead, C. (2011). Articles R Egulatory D Ualism As a D Evelopment S Trategy : C Orporate R Eform in B Razil , the U Nited S Tates , and the E Uropean U Nion. 475.
Hak, N. (2011). Ekonomi Islam Hukum Bisnis Syariah. Teras.
Khalaf, A. W. (2013). Ilmu Ushul al Fiqh. Dar al Kutub Ilmiyah.
Mujahidin, A. (2010). Prosedur Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia. Ghalia Indonesia.
Munawir, A. (1984). Kamus Al munawir. Pondok Pesantren Al Munawir.
Rahmadi, T. (2010). Mediasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Pendekatan Mufakat. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Rasyid, S. (2005). Fiqh Islam. Sinar baru Algresindo.
Suadi, A. (2017). Penyelesaian sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Teori dan Praktek. Kencana.
Sudarsono. (2001). Pokok Hukum Islam (Cet. 2). Rineka Cipta.
Witanto, D. (2011). Hukum Acara Mediasi. Alfabeta.
Journals
Alnuaimi, A. A., & Alkrisheh, M. A. (2024). Advancing criminal justice through mediation: analyzing the integration of mediation in Emirati criminal legislation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03458-8
Arifina, M., & Mansar, A. (2019). Features of Arbitration in Islamic Law when Resolving Disputes in Muamalah. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 9(10), 295.
Awaludin, R. (2021). Penyelesaian Sengketa Keluarga Secara Mediasi Non Litigasi dalam Kajian Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif. Al Maqashidi: Jurnal Hukum Islam Nusantara, 4(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.32665/almaqashidi.v4i2.918
Bonnitcha, J. (2024). What is the Problem with Investment Disputes? The Case of the Draft Legislative Guide on Investment Dispute Prevention and Mitigation. AJIL Unbound, 118, 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2024.43
Claussen, K. (2022). Symposium On Joost Pauwelyn And Krzysztof Pelc, “Who Guards The ‘Guardians Of The System’? The Role Of The Secretariat In Wto Dispute Settlement.” AJIL Unbound, 116, 400–404. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2022.65
Dewi, N. M. T. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Non Litigasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata. Jurnal Analisis Hukum, 5(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.38043/jah.v5i1.3223
Duan, J., & Zhang, B. B. (2024). Abusive litigation in China: comparative insights and practical approaches for reform. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03809-5
Hapsari, D. R. I., Ilmiawan, A. A. S., & Samira, E. (2022). Non-litigation as An Environmental Dispute Resolution Mechanism in Indonesia. Indonesia Law Reform Journal, 2(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v2i1.20756
Hidayat, D. (2023). Small Claim Court (SCC): Implementasi Dan Hambatannya Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 5(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v5i1.47-69
Hidayat, M. R., & Komarudin, P. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Wakaf Melalui Jalur Litigasi Dan Non-Litigasi. Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum, 11(2), 184. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v11i2.1936
Izzati, N. A., Permata, C. Q. N., & Santalia, M. (2020). Assessing the Effectiveness of Settling Indonesian Sea Border Disputes through Litigation and Non-Litigation Paths. Lex Scientia Law Review, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v4i1.38261
Latifah, E., Bajrektarevic, A., & Imanullah, M. N. (2019). The Shifting of Alternative Dispute Resolution: from Traditional Form to the Online Dispute Resolution Resolution. Brawijaya Law Journal, Journal of Legal Studies, 6(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2019.006.01.02
Liptak, A. (2018). The Litigation Privilege as a Shelter for Miscreant Legal Counsel. Oregon Law Review, 97(1), 993–996.
Muflikhuddin, A. (2020). Akad As Sulhu Sebagai Induk Penyelesaiam Sengketa Dalam Muamalah Menurut Imam Jalaluddin As Suyuthi. Jurnal As Salam, IX(1).
Reza, M. W., & Aditya, Z. F. (2019). Characteristic and Legality of Non-Litigation Regulatory Dispute Resolution Based on Constitutional Interpretation. European Journal of Law and Technology, 90, 92. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2019.006.02.04
Rochaeti, N., Prasetyo, M. H., Rozah, U., & Park, J. (2023). A Restorative Justice System in Indonesia: A Close View from the Indigenous Peoples’ Practices. Sriwijaya Law Review, 7(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss1.1919.pp87-104
Rosita. (2017). Alternatif Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa (Litigasi dan Non Litigasi). Al-Bayyinah: Journal of Islamic Law, 6(2), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.35673/al-bayyinah.v1i2.20
Shapiro, M. A. (2024). Recourse, Litigation, and the Rule of Law. Law and Philosophy, 43(6), 689–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-024-09510-7
Smith, C. (2024). Bias Response Teams : Designing for Free Speech and Conflict Resolution on the University Campus. Stanford Law Review, 76, 1837–1853.
Sulistiawati, L. Y. (2024). Climate change related litigation in Indonesia. Communications Earth and Environment, 5(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01684-1
Syahrani, R. (1985). Seluk Beluk dan Asas-Asas Hukum Perdata. Alumni.
Tampubolon, W. S. (2019). Peranan Seorang Arbriter Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Arbritase. Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 7(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.4337/mllwr.1982.1-4.13
Winata, M., & Aditya, Z. (2019). Characteristic and Legality of Non-Litigation Regulatory Dispute Resolution Based on Constitutional Interpretation. Brawijaya Law Journal, 6(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2019.006.02.04
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v15i2.29238
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Address: Yudisia Research Center, Department of Islamic Family Law, Sharia Faculty, IAIN Kudus; Jl. Conge Ngembalrejo, Ngembal Rejo, Ngembalrejo, Kec. Bae, Kabupaten Kudus, Jawa Tengah 59322