RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICERDOCTRINEAS A NEW IDEA IN THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL CODE (KUHP) ON CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN CORPORATIONS

M. Ridho Ilahi, Meida Adita Rahma, Fitha Ayun Lutfiya Nitha

Abstract


Abstract

The National Criminal Code, which was recently passed, contains several new provisions that have not been regulated in the Criminal Code used to date, while the provisions in question are corporate criminal liability. The focus of this research is criminal liability imposed on management (executive/superior) in a corporation in terms of article 48 letters d and e. In order to analyze the laws and regulations which are used as the main basis of the research, the researcher uses a normative method by using several international and national sources in the form of theories and explanations that are relevant to the article which is the focus of the discussion of this research. Based on this research, it can be understood that one of the concepts of criminal responsibility in the corporate sector regulated in the National Criminal Code is the responsible corporate officer (RCO) doctrine. However, this model of criminal responsibility is not fully adhered to in the National Criminal Code. Even the RCO concept will look vague if you don't review articles 46 and 49 of the National Criminal Code. In addition, criminal liability based on (RCO) needs to consider AD/ART in corporations considering that this type of accountability model is closely related to sectors within corporations.

Abstrak         

KUHP Nasional yang belum lama ini disahkan memuat beberapa ketentuan baru yang belum diatur pada KUHP yang digunakan sampai saat ini. Adapun ketentuan yang dimaksud adalah pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi. Adapun fokus pada penelitian ini adalah pertanggungjawaban pidana yang dibebankan pada pengurus (eksekutif/atasan) dalam korporasi yang ditinjau dari pasal 48 huruf d dan e. Guna menganalisis aturan perundang-undangan yang dijadikan landasan utama penelitian, peneliti menggunakan metode normatif dengan menggunakan beberapa sumber baik internasional maupun nasional berupa teori dan penjelasan yang relevan dengan pasal yang menjadi fokus pembahasan penelitian ini. Berdasarkan penelitian ini dapat dipahami  Salah satu konsep pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam sektor korporasi yang diatur pada KUHP Nasional adalah doktrin responsible corporate officer (RCO). Namun model pertanggungjawaban pidana tersebut tidak dianut sepenuhnya pada KUHP Nasional bahkan konsep RCO akan terlihat samar jika tidak meninjau pada pasal 46 dan 49 KUHP Nasional. Selain itu pertanggungjawaban pidana berdasarkan (RCO) perlu mempertimbangkan AD/ART dalam korporasi mengingat model pertanggungjawaban jenis ini erat kaitannya dengan sektoral dalam korporasi.

 


Keywords


KUHP Nasional; Doktrin Responsible Corporate Officer; Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporas

Full Text:

PDF

References


DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Pustaka dalam bentuk buku

Irwansyah. (2022). Penelitian Hukum Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel, Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media.

Reksodiputro, Mardjono. (2020). Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Depok: PT.Raja Grafindo Persada.

Remy Sjahdeini, Sutan. (2017). Ajaran Pemidanaan: Tindak Pidana Korporasi dan Seluk-Beluknya, Depok: Kencana.

Sntoso, Topo. (2023). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, Depok: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Pustaka dalam bentuk jurnal ilmiah

Andi Syahrir, Khairil, et al. (2022), Pembaharuan Metode Pembuktian Subjek Hukum Korporasi sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Tomou Tou Law Rieview, 1 (1).

Asmui. (2023). Penjatuhan Sanksi dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Yudisia: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam, 14 (1).

Cohen, Mark A. (1996). Theories of Punishment and Empirical Trends in CorporateCriminal Sanctions. Managerial and Decision Economics, 17.

Dubber, Markus. (2013). The Comparative History and Theory of Corporate Criminal Liability. New Criminal Law Review. 16 (2).

Fatimah, Fines dan Nawawi Arief, Barda. (2012) Pertanggungjawaban Pengganti (Vicarious Liability) dalam Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Law Reform, 7 (2).

Harkrisnowo, Harkristuti. (2019). Redefinisi Pidana dan Pemidanaan Korporasi Dalam Perspektif Rancangan Undang-Undang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 16 (4).

J. Sepinwall, Amy . (2014). Responsible Shares And Shared Responsibility: In Defense of Responsible Corporate Officer Liability. Columbia Business Law Review, 2.

Kim J.D, Jane. (2017). Staying Responsible Within The Healthcare Industry In The Era of The Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine. Indiana Health Review, 14 (1).

Kristian. (2013). Urgensi Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan, 44 (4), 575-621.

Kushner, Amiad. (2003). Applying The Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine Outside The Public Welfare. The Journal Of Criminal Law & Criminology. 93.

Praiseda Alviolita, Fifink. (2018). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Oleh Pengurus Korporasi Dikaitkan Dengan Asas Geen Straf Zonder Schuld. Refleksi Hukum, 3 (1).

S. Hustis, Brenda. (1994). The Responsible Corporate Officer: Designated Felon or Legal Fiction?. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 25 (2).

Sarin, Natasha & S. Lund, Dorothy. (2021). Corporate Crime and Punishment: An Empirical Study. Texas Law Review, 100 (2). (2021).

United States Environmental Protection Agency, “What is the definition of a responsible corporate officer (RCO) who is required to certify some of the submissions involved?”. (2003)

Yadav, Vikrant Sopan. (2015). Corporate Criminal Liability: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Trend. International Journal of Applied Research, 1 (10).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v15i1.22306

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Hasil gambar untuk morarefImage result for isjdHasil gambar untuk google scholarHasil gambar untuk sinta dikti    

Address: Yudisia Research Center, Department of Islamic Family Law, Sharia Faculty, IAIN Kudus; Jl. Conge Ngembalrejo, Ngembal Rejo, Ngembalrejo, Kec. Bae, Kabupaten Kudus, Jawa Tengah 59322


Yudisia : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam by Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam (Ahwal Syakhshiyah) Fakultas Syariah IAIN Kudus is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.