Exploring Legal Istinbāt̩h in the Construction of Disability Fiqh : Insights from Nahdlatul ‘Ulama Advisory Board (LBMNU)

Mohamad Asep

Abstract


The aim of this article is to analyze and uncover the legal istinbāt̩ methodology used by the Nahdlatul ‘Ulama Advisory Board (LBMNU) in constructing the book of disability jurisprudence. To the best of the author's knowledge, there has been no prior article discussing this matter. This discourse is highly significant for discussion, as the book serves as a reference for Muslim individuals with disabilities in the field of jurisprudence, encompassing matters of worship, transactions, and law. The methodology employed in this research is library research, utilizing a content analysis approach. The research findings indicate that LBMNU constructs disability jurisprudence using three methodologies: Qouliy, Ilḥaqiy, and Manhajiy, with some fatwas found to employ a collaborative (mixed) method. The Qouliy method remains the most frequently utilized, followed by the Manhajiy, collaborative, and Ilḥaqiy methods. These three methodologies stem from the decisions of the National Assembly of Islamic Scholars and the National Conference of NU in Bandarlampung regarding the legal decision-making system in the Nahdlatul Ulama Advisory Board. Thus, in formulating the book of disability jurisprudence, LBMNU continues to utilize these three methods, while still considering the welfare of individuals with disabilities.


Keywords


Disability Fiqh, Nahdlatul ‘Ulama, Qouliy, Ilḥaqiy, Manhajiy.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lembaga Bahtsul Masail Nahdlatul ’Ulama, Perhimpunan Pengembangan Pesantren Masyarakat (P3M) dan, (PSLD), & Pusat Studi dan Pelayanan Disabilitas. (2018). Fikih Penguatan Penyandang Disabilitas (S. Husna, Ed.; Cetakan I). Lembaga Bahtsul Masail PBNU.

Mahfudh, S. (2004). Nuansa Fikih Sosial. LkiS.

Mahsun. (2015). Mazhab NU Mazhab Praktis: Bermazhab Secara Manhaji dan Implementasinya dalam Bahsul Masail Nahdlatul Ulama. Nadi Pustaka

Masyhuri, A. (2004). Masalah Keagamaan. QultumMedia

Zuchdi Darmiyati, & Afifah Wiwiek. (2019). Analisis Konten, Etnografi, & Grounded Theory, dan Hermeneutika dalam Penelitian (R. Damayanti, Ed.; 1st ed.). Bumi Aksara.

Abshor, M. U. (2016). Dinamika Ijtihad Nahdlatul Ulama (Analisis Pergeseran Paradigma dalam Lembaga Bahtsul Masail NU). Millati, Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities, 1(2), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.18326/millati.v1i1.227-242

Al-Aoufi, H., Al-Zyoud, N., & Shahminan, N. (2012). Islam and the cultural conceptualisation of disability. In International Journal of Adolescence

Exploring Legal Istinbath ……

Yudisia: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam 89

and Youth (Vol. 17, Issue 4, pp. 205–219). https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2011.649565

Farid Wajidi, M., Mustafid, F., Sunan, U., & Yogyakarta, K. (n.d.). MARRIAGE PRACTICES IN THE DIGITAL AGE: A Comparative Analysis of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama’s Fatwas on Online Marriage. https://journal.iainkudus.ac.id/index.php/Yudisia/index

Fuad, A. J. (2020). Akar Sejarah Moderasi Islam Pada Nahdlatul Ulama. Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, 31(1), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.33367/tribakti.v31i1.991

Hosen, N. (2004). NAHDLATUL ULAMA AND COLLECTIVE IJTIHAD. In New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies (Vol. 6).

Ibrahim, I., & Ismail, M. F. (2018). Muslims with Disabilities: Psychosocial Reforms from an Islamic Perspective. Journal of Disability and Religion, 22(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/23312521.2017.1351327

Ma’mun, S. (2011). ILHAQ DALAM BAHTSUL MASA’IL NU; ANTARA IJTIHAD DAN IKHTIYAT. ALQALAM, 28(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.32678/alqalam.v28i1.512

Mufid, M. (2020). Green Fatwas in Bahtsul Masā’il: Nahdlatul Ulama’s Response to the Discourse of Environmental Crisis in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial, 15(2), 173–200. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v15i2.3656

Mumtahanah, N. (2016). BAHTSUL MASAIL NU (Sebuah Kritik Metodologi). AKADEMIKA, 10(2), 151–159.

Mutakin, A. (2018). KITAB KUNING DAN TRADISI INTELEKTUAL NAHDLATUL ULAMA (NU) DALAM PENENTUAN HUKUM (Menelisik Tradisi Riset Kitab Kuning). Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran, 18(2), 192. https://doi.org/10.18592/sy.v18i2.2270

Silvia Pramashela, F., & Abdul Rachim, H. (2021). AKSESIBILITAS PELAYANAN PUBLIK BAGI PENYANDANG DISABILITAS DI INDONESIA. In Focus: Jurnal Pekerjaan Sosial e (Vol. 4, Issue 2).

Kementrian Sosial Republik Indonesia. (2021). Pedoman Operasional Asistensi Rehabilitasi Sosial Penyandang Disabilitas. https://kemensos.go.id/uploads/topics/16384433731911.pdf

Pengurus Besar Nahdlatul ’Ulama. (2015). Anggaran Dasar dan Anggaran Rumah Tangga NU. Lembaga Ta’lif Wan Nasyr PBNU.

Riyanto, A. (2017). Metode Mazhab Manhaji Nahdhatul Ulama (Studi Pandangan Aktivis Bahtsul Masail Jawa Timur tentang Metode Istinbath Ahkam Hasil Muktamar ke-33). UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

Yahya, I. (2002). Kritik Nalar Fikih NU (I. Rahmat, Ed.). LAKPESDAM.

Zahroh, A. (2004). Tradisi Intelektual NU. LkiS.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v15i1.22103

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Hasil gambar untuk morarefImage result for isjdHasil gambar untuk google scholarHasil gambar untuk sinta dikti    

Address: Yudisia Research Center, Department of Islamic Family Law, Sharia Faculty, IAIN Kudus; Jl. Conge Ngembalrejo, Ngembal Rejo, Ngembalrejo, Kec. Bae, Kabupaten Kudus, Jawa Tengah 59322


Yudisia : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam by Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam (Ahwal Syakhshiyah) Fakultas Syariah IAIN Kudus is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.