ASPECT OF LANGUAGE ON A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF STUDENT’S EVALUATION INSTRUMENT

Ismanto Ismanto

Abstract


This article examined the characteristics of good student’s evaluation instrument. There are at least two requirements that must be met. Those are valid and reliable. The validity of the instrument can be seen from the instrument's ability to measure what should be measured. The fact the existence of the validity of an instrument may be a grain fill, the response process, internal structure, relationship with other variables, and the consequences of the implementation of the charging instrument. Analysis of the content is then known as content validity, i.e. rational analysis of the domain to be measured to determine the representation of each item on the instrument with the ability to be measured. Content validity is submitting pieces of blue print and items of the instrument to the experts to be analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively.


Keywords


Aspects Of Language, Student’s Evaluation Instruments, Content Validity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, M.J. & Yen, W.M. 1979. Introduction to Measurement Theory. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

Arifin, Z. 2012. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam Kementerian Agama RI.

Azwar, S. 2013. Validitas dan Reliabilitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Basuki, I.A. (Ed.). 2010. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Crocker, L. & Algina, J. 2008. Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. OH: Cengage Learning.

Gregory, R.J. 2007. Psychological Testing: History, Principles, and Application. Boston: Pearson.

Hambleton, R. K. & Patsula, L. 1999. Increasing the Validity of Adapted Test: Myth to be Avoided and Guidelines for Improving Test Adaptation Practices. Journal of Applied Testing Psychology, August 1999. Acossiation of Test Publishers (ATP).

Khabibah, S. 2006. Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Soal Terbuka untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Disertasi doktor, tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya.

Kumaidi. 2014, 24 Mei. Validitas dan Pemvalidasian Instrumen Penilaian Karakter. Makalah disajikan dalam seminar Nasional Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Pendidikan Karakter yang Valid, di Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Mardapi, D. 2008. Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan Non Tes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia Press.

Mardapi, D. 2012. Pengukuran, Penilaian & Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Litera.

Nieveen, Nienke. 1999. Prototyping to Reach Product Quality. In Van den Akker, Jan., et. al. Design Approaches and Tools in Education Training (pp 125 – 135). Dordrecht: The Netherland Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. 1994. Psichometric Theory (3rd edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan

Retnawati, H. 2016. Validitas, Reliabilitas & Karakteristik Butir. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Suharsono, Y. & Istiqomah. 2014. Validitas dan Reliabilitas Skala Self-efficacy. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan. Vol. 02, No.01, 144-151.

Supratiknya, A. 2014. Pengukuran Psikologis. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Universitas Sanata Dharma.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v4i2.1788

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.